yuktyudyānapālaḥ

[yuktyudyānapālaḥ @logokepouros]

@razibkhan @Indian_Bronson @Aarvoll_ the ancestral tradition's answer would be a very resounding 'the diluted are [way] better' in this case. many citations possible, from the brāhmaṇa genre down to the late purāṇas, and Greek would support too

[yuktyudyānapālaḥ @logokepouros]

@TrueAIHound any reco reading re what is it exactly that nature has to teach us?

[yuktyudyānapālaḥ @logokepouros]

@raila_san sounds like you're implying ajeya wouldn't have made it without a gender-based consideration, which is not helping the cause fyi.

[yuktyudyānapālaḥ @logokepouros]

@TrueAIHound Thank you, this is a thesis I've wanted to believe but have fought for long heh.

Maybe there is an ~infinity of knowers who approach to bind beings, but of course the hosts differ widely. But even if one does bind a machine, would we ever know?

[yuktyudyānapālaḥ @logokepouros]

@dioscuri Is this some new kind of Rorschach or Bouba-Kiki test, because I'm just not able to flip them at all -- it appears to be half going right, half going left, literally.

[yuktyudyānapālaḥ @logokepouros]

@sharmasatyan Both these options fly in the face of the creators of such śāstra!

You need continuity and innovation in a healthy mix.

yaṃ śiṣṭā brāhmaṇā brūyuḥ sa dharmaḥ syād aśaṅkitaḥ

The big question is: will the real śiṣṭā brāhmaṇā please stand up?

[yuktyudyānapālaḥ @logokepouros]

@HilaShmuel sorry but this needs to be at least source-available if not open-source.

[yuktyudyānapālaḥ @logokepouros]

@martin_casado you're sorry?

[yuktyudyānapālaḥ @logokepouros]

@dxrsam_0 the original is lokAchAra, not lokayAtrA

[yuktyudyānapālaḥ @logokepouros]

@omarsar0 don't tell us WHO it is but care to tell us WHY this excitement when it is just glm 5.3

[yuktyudyānapālaḥ @logokepouros]

@koltregaskes it's talking about tiananmen like it's wikipedia.

not chinese for sure.

[yuktyudyānapālaḥ @logokepouros]

@patrickc hey @elder_plinius can you tell us who made this model pls

[yuktyudyānapālaḥ @logokepouros]

@sanjuhs123 @danielhanchen near frontier? prove it.

[yuktyudyānapālaḥ @logokepouros]

@HristoforG @ggerganov Mermaid diagrams? Come on dude. Old *Gemma* can draw Mermaid diagrams. Heck even OLMo 3 can somewhat tolerably. Use it for something real.

For instance, ask it "what is the Indic equivalent of the I Ching" -- compare the answer against GPT-5.6. Simple historical research.

[yuktyudyānapālaḥ @logokepouros]

@shreyas stop giving such brutally commercially effective ideas to them!

have they not destroyed enough already?

[yuktyudyānapālaḥ @logokepouros]

@BeheraSuprit that is 100% correct, but it simply does not follow that that would be the book to choose to do it.

can you, for one, resist the urge to replace one poverty-stricken reductionism with another, and instead take the effort to truly engage with the scholarship with an open mind?

[yuktyudyānapālaḥ @logokepouros]

@arya_amsha Haaaang on. Kumarila only speaks of greater skill in *service* and *house-related work*. Saying technology is a stretch.

tasmād yathaiva sevādau gṛhādiṣu ca kauśalam

mlecchānām adhikaṃ tadvad abhidheyārthanirṇaye

[yuktyudyānapālaḥ @logokepouros]

@sharmasatyan Objection: codanālakṣaṇo dharmaḥ—śāstra is fundamentally codanā, founded in satya, sure, but not itself making satya as the primary job.