@paolo_scales saw the same pattern in cold email. when we ran 10 topic questions through ChatGPT, it cited official docs (Google, Microsoft, the UK regulator) for the technical ones and vendors for the tool ones. nothing from small blogs. third-party proof wins.
@NickAbraham12 two I'd add: alignment (SPF or DKIM has to match your From domain or DMARC fails) and permerror (2+ SPF records or 11+ lookups and SPF fails outright). we checked 25 cold email tools' own domains and 2 of them have it.
looking for an SDR job in 2026?
SDR job posts are down 21% across US B2B.
AI-native companies went the other way: SDR headcount more than doubled, and SDRs make up a 50% bigger share of their GTM hiring.
put them at the top of your list.
my cold email site in Google, Oct 27–Nov 7:
485 impressions
3 clicks
avg position 24.8
ranking: a ZeroBounce review page (positions 2–10)
not yet: SPF and bounce-code guides (45–94)
the review page got there first.
building this in public: https://t.co/CbwMKAWtQm
use this list without burning a domain:
1. find one real address there (press page, blog byline)
2. that's the pattern for everyone
3. verify your guess
4. "valid": send. "catch-all": don't trust it. "invalid": skip 5. keep bounces under 1%, stop at 2%
https://t.co/TE3jPwHzoH
the most valuable line here is #1.
at a company under 10 people, firstname@ is usually the founder.
Belkins, 7.5M emails: founders reply more than any other title (0.57%), and tiny companies beat every other size (0.72%).
the best inbox in cold email has the simplest address.
startup emails, ranked
1. firstname@
2. firstinitial@
3. firstinitiallastinitial@
4. firstname.lastname@
5. firstinitial.lastname@
the crazy thing is these are almost always available, because people usually pick their own names instead
@hg_chaos yes, headcount first, then title. same Belkins data: founders/owners reply at 0.57%, VPs at 0.32%.
small company + founder is the best mix in the whole study. the copy matters less than who you send to.
cold email isn't dead. it's dead at tier-1.
Belkins, 7.5M emails: companies with 0–10 people reply 3x more than companies with 10,000+ (0.72% vs 0.22%).
pitch enterprise in public. email the founders.
Cold outbound is dead.
When I want to close a tier-1 client now, I pitch them publicly on X.
A: Private outbound:
Send one cold email to one inbox. It gets buried under 400 other pitches, deleted by an EA, and seen by zero people.
B: Public shot:
Take that exact same pitch and post it on the timeline.
Even if that specific founder ignores you:
- 50 other founders in their cap table see it
- Every engineer and operator reading the feed sees how you think
- Your ICP watches you pitch with complete confidence in public
One private message gets seen by 0 people.
One public pitch gets seen by 50,000 potential buyers.
More founders need to start doing this 🤷🏻
@NickAbraham12 2021 asks for 30 minutes. 2026 offers something free.
Gong's data backs it: across 304,174 emails, asking about interest beat asking for a meeting time.
give first, ask second.
@bretonwill one check before rewriting the offer: make sure it's landing.
bounces under 2% and a seed test showing inbox = contacts-per-positive-reply is a clean offer signal.
if half of it sits in spam, 2,000 contacts per reply says nothing about the offer.
jokes aside, the data just got cheap. the inbox didn't.
verify every list, ~20 emails per inbox a day, never from your main domain.
that's still where most campaigns die.
Introducing headless Clay for agents.
→ Search 250M+ people & 26M+ companies
→ Get emails, job & company data
→ 1000 credits/month free
→ 88% cheaper than Clay at scale
Run all of your enrichment flows in ChatGPT, Claude, Grokbot, and beyond!
https://t.co/pVrxIyAENy