@DrGauravGarg4 Aru yeh bhi itifak nahi hai tu chutia hai.
Pehle one piece dekh ke aao uske baad baat karo. Na ki internet me do line pard he lecture de ne suru ho jao.
@rlungleng You are right how will the children learn to be loyal to the state. They never will because of people like you, who sit behind a mic and spread wrong message.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s visit to Sikkim has once again raised a familiar question—what do these high-profile visits actually deliver for the state?
The event followed a well-known format: public appearances, speeches and praise for Sikkim’s beauty and culture. But key issues remained unaddressed. Long-standing demands like Scheduled Tribe status for several communities, reservation of the Lok Sabha seat and the Inner Line Permit could not find a spot in his speech or discussions.
There are also larger concerns. The 2023 glacial flood, which caused heavy loss of life, still lacks clear accountability. Infrastructure problems, especially road conditions, continue to affect daily life.
This raises a broader point about how Sikkim is viewed from Delhi. Is it being treated as a state with specific political and social concerns, or mainly as a strategic and symbolic region?
Whereas a Prime Minister’s visit should go beyond messaging. It should engage with the issues people have been raising for years. Until that happens, these visits will continue to leave important questions unanswered.
This editorial examines what was highlighted during the visit and what was not. It also explores the nature of the Centre’s engagement with Sikkim and whether such high-profile visits address the state’s structural concerns or remain limited to messaging and optics.
#Sikkim #NortheastIndia