It’s criminal the CEO makes 400X what the average worker makes but it’s perfectly fine that Taylor Swift makes 100000X more than the people who clean the arena after her concerts. A just society is one that rewards the exceptional qualities of the musician but not the executive.
Absolutely nobody on earth is more petulant or self-involved than UK Labour politicians. They genuinely believe that the worst problem the world faces is that social media forces them to hear from their peasants who are angry with them, and they never stop whining about it.🇬🇧
Its been apparent to me for a long time that the green agenda's purpose is to increase the price of energy and make it scarce and rationed in order to make people dependent on those rationing.
When I was a child, my grandfather would sometimes solemnly intone at the dinner table: "The purpose of socialism is to organize scarcity."
As a kid it sort-of didn't register in my brain as meaning anything beyond "socialism bad", but eventually when I was 12 or something, I did ask what he meant by those specific words.
And he said: socialists establish control of valuable resources and then create an artificial scarcity of these resources, so that they can then use them as a tool of control by deciding who gets and doesn't get those resources.
And I thought that was wrong. I mean, are socialists misguided? Sure. But to claim that they deliberately create scarcity as a means of political control? That seemed far-fetched.
But, of course, he was entirely correct.
Holy. Shit.
Tim Walz actually just pardoned an illegal immigrant who raped a 10-year-old girl. He did it to shield him from being deported.
What the fuck is happening…
Tim Walz and this man should be hanged.
The judge said in this case that Burke had "completely lost his moral compass" and he said that Burke "was not entitled to his own truth"
But this case centred on a dispute concerning the jurisprudence of delusion and lies over truth. The court sided with the morality of lies. A lie about gender superceding sex. A lie about the abstract having pre-eminence over the objective. It was a disgrace and an embarrassment to law. This judge is an embarrassment to truth law and justice
High Court orders release of Enoch Burke from prison https://t.co/BupOo8zecf
Carbon consumption is just the secular version of Original Sin.
“Yeah, yeah, you are evil for existing, and you have to pay us forever to lift the curse.”
A 17 year old girl offered a lad a lift. That's it. That's her whole crime. Being kind. He got in. Then three more climbed in after him.
FOR SIX HOURS, police say, they raped her. Over and over. Driving her round Sydney in her own car like she was a thing, not a child.
Then they dumped her back in the driver's seat and walked off like they'd done nothing. She's SEVENTEEN and she has to live with this for the rest of her life.
That's one of them being marched out of a house in cuffs. The only one of the four old enough to be named. The rest hide behind their age. They were 14, 16 and 18.
Listen to the family screaming at the police. Why are you arresting him. Why him. Shut your mouth, don't say a word. Not one of them screaming for her.
Here's what police say happened, because it's worse than people know.
Half five on a Sunday. Liverpool Westfield, southwest Sydney. A 16 year old she'd never met starts chatting, all friendly, follows her to her car and talks his way in and while he's allegedly attacking her, police say he's on a video call to the others. Filming it. Sending it round. Calling them in.
So no, this wasn't something that just got out of hand. They were watching, allegedly, before they even turned up.
He asks for a lift to a park. She says yes, thinking he'll get out when they arrive. He doesn't. Two more are waiting. A fourth pulls up in another car. And then, police allege, they took control of her own car and drove her round the suburbs while it carried on.
The detective leading the case didn't hold back. She said it beggars belief that men would act this way over six hours and then the line that sticks. In all those six hours, not one of them stopped and said to the others, this is wrong. Not once.
Six hours. Till half eleven at night, when they allegedly left her in the car and walked off. She rang a mate, who drove her to the police station and this is the part that should make people sit up.
That girl, after all of that, gave police a detailed statement over several days. The detective called it the strength of the victim. She is the reason they had the evidence at all. She handed them the case.
Look at the charges if you think it's being overblown.
The 16 year old on his own faces 24 of them. Nine counts of sexual intercourse without consent. The 14 year old, ten more.
A dedicated unit, Strike Force Dungannon, was set up to chase it down and they didn't rush it for a headline. They waited SIX MONTHS to arrest the two older ones, quietly building the case so it would hold.
The moment they knew they could throw the book at them, they moved. When they did, they needed the riot squad to get them out of the houses and none of it happened last week. This was December 2024.
That girl has carried it for over a year already. And it's only grinding through court now, in 2026. Still going. Still not done. She's still waiting.
She was kind for thirty seconds. They took six hours and the rest of her life for it. Four of them. One girl and over a year on, she's STILL waiting for justice to catch up.
That's the world we're handing our daughters.
So remember her. Because the system already wants you to forget and ask yourself what kind of country leaves a child waiting this long.
It's like hearing "We should probably keep convicted embezzlers away from the Federal Reserve." and replying, "Why do you hate accountants?" Normal people don't make that leap.
I always enjoy these discussions because they begin with someone saying, "We have to be very careful not to overreact to minor crimes." and then, in what I assume is an unfortunate coincidence, the list of these "minor crimes" turns out to include exposing yourself to children, molesting children, grooming children, and rape.
At this point I have to pause and check whether I accidentally wandered into an alternate universe where the FBI's Most Wanted list is categorized under "Youthful Indiscretions."
As an LGBT woman (yes, bisexual; I know, the lore gets complicated) I find it fascinating that every so often someone tries to imply that imposing restrictions on convicted sex offenders is somehow an LGBT issue.
No.
The suggestion that gay people are somehow uniquely threatened by laws targeting child predators is vastly more insulting than anything Westboro Baptist Church ever managed to scribble on a piece of poster board.
Here's a radical proposal: gay people are perfectly capable of existing without molesting children. I realize this is an extremist position.
Now, to be fair, there is a historical reason this conversation exists at all. Before the 1990s (and in many places well afterward) being openly gay could genuinely be dangerous. Young gay people often relied on older members of the community to teach them where it was safe to go, who to trust, how to avoid getting arrested, beaten, or worse. Some of those mentor relationships also became sexual relationships.
That history is real. It deserves to be understood, so we don't repeat it. Driving gay people underground necessitated some messed up stuff.
It does not deserve to continue to be public policy in 2026.
Today, a young gay person who wants advice does not have to find an older sexual mentor. They have books. Websites. Community organizations. Support groups. Therapists. Pride centers. Approximately eight trillion Tumblr posts. If civilization collapsed tomorrow, archaeologists of the future could reconstruct modern LGBT culture solely from the accumulated weight of "Top 10 Signs Your Crush Is Also Gay" articles on the internet.
The old model was born from necessity in a hostile society. The necessity is gone.
This is why I become deeply suspicious whenever someone hears, "Perhaps convicted child molesters shouldn't serve on school boards." and immediately concludes this is somehow an attack on LGBT people. That thought does not occur naturally in 2026.
It's like hearing "We should probably keep convicted embezzlers away from the Federal Reserve." and replying, "Why do you hate accountants?" Normal people don't make that leap.
When someone repeatedly insists that restrictions on convicted sex offenders are secretly about gay rights, my first reaction isn't to wonder whether they're defending LGBT people. It's to wonder why their brain connected those two ideas before mine did.
I'm going to be charitable and think they are just old gays who still think the world worked the way it did before being openly gay and young was even possible.
I sincerely hope it's not something far worse.
Future historians will not describe what happened to Western Europe in the early 21st century as immigration policy. They will describe it as the deliberate demographic transformation of ancient nations without the consent of their peoples. Implemented through frameworks no parliament approved. Enforced through legal structures no election could touch. Accompanied by the systematic suppression of dissent. They will ask how it was allowed to happen. The answer will be that most people didn't understand what they were up against until it was too late.
Seven years ago in Portland, Ore.
None of the Antifa attackers who nearly killed me (I suffered a subarachnoid brain hemorrhage) were arrested by @PortlandPolice. None were prosecuted by the district attorney’s office. @multdems said nothing. So did @tedwheeler. @cmclymer, then a spokesman for the Human Rights Campaign, posted that I deserved it.
Three of the violent attackers I identified are trans. I never received justice. That's how my story ended in Portland before I had to leave the country due to mounting death threats from Antifa.
Tomorrow, eight of the remaining convicted North Texas Antifa terrorists will be sentenced. Last week, their co-defendants received a combined 450 years in federal prison. https://t.co/7KvehraOcs
@AlbieDavietoyr@BasilTheGreat But you felt the race of the aggressor was/is important -both from the analysis of what happened and how it should be analysed. This sounds like an implicit acknowledgement of a race war.
It's amazing that these decrepit neocon imbeciles have gotten every major issue wrong for 40 years and just absolutely insist on keeping their streak of unbroken wrongness alive at all costs. Yes, 27 million people immigrated here between 1880 and 1924. The difference is that they came here legally, there was no welfare state for them to leach off of, they were not flooding in from dysfunctional lawless third world hellholes, and they actually desired to assimilate into American culture. Oh and we had 250 million fewer people living in the country at the time. So in other words, it was nothing like our current situation. At all. Not remotely.