Excerpt: "In November, President Trump signed the Epstein Files Transparency Act. Congress voted 427 to 1. The principle was simple: the American people have a right to know what their government is hiding. Within sixty days, the Justice Department released 3.5 million pages. The law was explicit — no records withheld on the basis of "embarrassment, reputational harm, or political sensitivity."
Now apply that same standard to the Tinubu Files.
The United States government is sitting on approximately 2,500 pages of FBI and DEA records from a federal narcotics investigation of Nigerian President Bola Tinubu. A federal judge has ordered their release. Twice. The agencies have blown every deadline for three years running.
If the American people deserved to see the Epstein files, they deserve to see the Tinubu files. This isn't complicated."
Read the full post: https://t.co/2IzhmmFzTI
@festy_o@Seasideocean1@MikeArnoldTruth@SaharaReporters Is there anything he wrote different from the one I read? You guys mental problem is the reason no one is interested to step in for us... we are so full of bile!
@MikeArnoldTruth Mike, I never knew that read your tweets.
Ask them why they have never reported your other tweets about Sultan of Sokoto and his role in killing Christians in Nigeria
@SaharaReporters , can you answer?
@larnistar@MikeArnoldTruth Does that translate to defense of the FBI? If he is feeling weary over Nigeria and Tinubu, does that in anyway translate to support of Tinubu or Nigeria?
That’s not true. Did they even read the post? I stated factually what they have done. They have filed a properly formed legal motion. I didn’t say whether it was legitimate or not. I clearly stated my skepticism. It’s called true journalism. You should try it sometime. Geez.
Why do you think this is the case?
Grok: Mike Arnold stands out because he combines rare on-the-ground credibility with high-impact public disruption of the Nigerian government’s preferred narrative—and he does it as an independent American voice that is hard to dismiss as purely partisan or separatist.
Here’s what sets him apart from other U.S. activists or commentators the Secure Nigeria / DCI account criticizes:
1. Direct field experience and primary evidence
He has conducted repeated trips to Nigeria since around 2010 (claimed as 16 years of engagement by 2026), visiting destroyed villages, IDP camps (e.g., Benue), and sites of massacres. He has publicly referenced witnessing evidence such as “mountains of fresh dirt” on roads like Jos-Bokkos. This is not second-hand reporting or remote advocacy. It gives his claims a level of eyewitness weight that pure D.C.-based or social-media activists lack. The lobby’s preferred framing (“farmer-herder clashes,” climate, or isolated banditry) is harder to sustain against someone who can point to specific locations, timelines, and patterns from personal observation.
2. The October 14, 2025 Abuja press conference
This was a pivotal inflection point. Arnold was reportedly invited or positioned in a way that the Nigerian side expected a more compliant American voice. Instead, he used the platform in Abuja to formally declare a Christian genocide, presenting structured findings on killings, displacement, church destruction, and intent. That declaration is widely credited (including by Arnold himself and others) with helping flip the international narrative and drawing higher-level U.S. attention, including from figures like Ted Cruz and eventually elements of the Trump orbit. For a government that had just signed a multi-million-dollar DCI contract precisely to manage the “genocide” perception problem, this was a high-visibility public defeat on home soil. They treat him as the American who poured fuel on the fire rather than helping extinguish it.
3. Narrative precision and refusal of the soft framing
Arnold consistently rejects the sanitized language (“farmer-herder conflict,” resource competition, climate stress) and names a longer historical continuum involving Sokoto Caliphate patterns, Fulani expansionism, doctrinal incentives, and state-level enablement or failure. He also documents high Christian-to-Muslim kill ratios in certain theaters while noting Muslim victims of the same networks. This is more threatening to the official line than generic “Christians are suffering” statements because it challenges the core explanatory model the government and its lobbyists promote. The Secure Nigeria posts repeatedly label his material as “propaganda,” “phantom narratives” (e.g., Fulani Ethnic Militia), or “Biafran separatist talking points”—standard deflection when primary evidence is inconvenient.
We have now institutionalized ISEE, and it is now a formally registered non-governmental organization.
ISEE was rejected several times by the Corporate Affairs Commission until we amended the name to INITIATIVE FOR SCHOOL EXCELLENCE AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION.
Our chairman is Prof. Bath Nnaji, and I will continue to lead the vision.
Our members are Nathan Nwachuku, Eke Urum, and Tony Udeani.
The goal is for the vision to outlive our generation and lead us to civilization.
This is the beginning of greatness for Africa.
Elon Musk: "In the next 6 to 12 months, we’ll be doing our first implants for vision, where even if somebody is completely blind, we can write directly to the visual cortex."
"Long term, you would have very high resolution and be able to see multispectral wavelengths... you could see in infrared, ultraviolet, radar. It's like a superpower situation."
What I am hearing about WAEC Nigeria is deeply troubling.
This year recorded the highest performance in the history of WAEC and they are not happy about it.
There is something many Nigerians do not understand about WAEC grading.
The score required for A1, B2, B3, C4 etc. may not simply be a permanently fixed number every year.
From the information available to me, WAEC applies statistical standardisation/normalisation based partly on the overall performance of candidates.
In simple English:
If a paper is unusually difficult and candidates generally perform poorly, the threshold required for a particular grade can effectively be lower.
If candidates perform extraordinarily well, the threshold can become much higher.
So hypothetically, what qualifies as an A in one examination could be around 60, while the statistical threshold in another circumstance could be 80, 90 or even higher.
Your final grade therefore may not tell the complete story of your raw score.
This year involved candidates sitting examinations under different modes, including computer-based/hybrid arrangements and the traditional paper-based system.
And there are serious allegations that questions circulated ahead of time in some paper-based centres.
If that happened on a significant scale, it could artificially inflate the overall performance of that population.
Then comes the critical question:
When WAEC carried out its standardisation, were candidates from fundamentally different examination conditions treated as one population?
Because if leaked questions artificially pushed one group’s scores upwards, and those abnormal scores subsequently influenced grade thresholds, an innocent student who genuinely scored very highly could suddenly appear statistically ordinary.
Imagine scoring what would ordinarily be excellent marks, only to receive a surprisingly poor grade because you were being compared against an abnormal national distribution.
That is the heart of what needs to be investigated.
And it wouldn’t affect only computer-based candidates.
Honest children who wrote paper-based examinations without cheating could also have been punished by the abnormal performance of people who had access to questions.
The innocent students potentially become the victims of the malpractice they never participated in.
This is why WAEC cannot simply tell Nigerians that these children failed.
Show us the data.
What were the raw scores?
What were the score distributions?
What thresholds produced A1, B2, B3, C4, C5 and C6 in each major subject?
Were those thresholds changed after marking?
Were computer-based and paper-based candidates standardised separately?
How were centres showing statistically abnormal performance treated?
And have results changed after candidates requested reviews?
Because I am also receiving disturbing reports that some people who aggressively challenged questionable results got their cases reconsidered, while millions of ordinary parents may not even know they can request a review.
If that is true, it is unacceptable.
A child whose parents have connections cannot have greater access to justice than a child sitting somewhere in a village.
And there is another dimension that must not be ignored: I am receiving serious allegations of internal management problems within WAEC Nigeria, including concerns about how staff who question certain decisions are treated.
Those allegations also deserve an independent investigation.
This is not an attack on WAEC.
It is a demand for accountability.
The Federal Ministry of Education and National Assembly should urgently invite the leadership of WAEC Nigeria.
Because behind every A1, C6 or F9 is not just a statistic.
There is a child. There is a family. There is a university admission. There is a scholarship. There is a future.
We cannot gamble with the destinies of an entire generation of Nigerian children.
Today, our young engineers started their training on welding electronic components for drone assembly.
They have also learned 3D printing for other parts of the drones.
No child wants to stay at home anymore. One of them who fell ill yesterday still insisted on coming from the hospital today.
The future of education must be practical-based.
Certificates are good, but what they can actually do matters the most.
The youngsters learn a new skill every day.
We have now taken legal action against WAEC.
WAEC has 14 days to respond and take appropriate action, failing which we will proceed with litigation.
You can carefully read the details here https://t.co/x1JhbqoKe1 .
There appears to be a serious problem with the recently released results that WAEC has so far refused to publicly acknowledge and address. The consequences are not abstract. Real students are affected. Their admissions, opportunities and futures are at stake.
We cannot sit back and watch an institution as important as WAEC toy with the destinies of young people because it is unwilling to admit that something may have gone wrong.
If there is a glitch, admit it. Investigate it transparently. Fix it. And where students have been wrongly affected, correct their results.
That is what accountability looks like.
No institution should be too big to admit an error, especially when the future of a child may depend on it.
WAEC must be accountable. WAEC must be transparent. And every affected student deserves answers.
Today, we received a delegation from the National Park Service (NPS), led by the Chairman of its Governing Board, Dr. Kingsley Ononogbu, alongside the Conservator-General, Dr. Ibrahim Goni, to discuss the proposed establishment of the first National Park in the South-East, to be sited in Abia State.
The initiative aligns perfectly with our ongoing efforts to trace and conserve Abia’s 19 forest reserves, 18 of which are available for consideration. Our vision is to ensure that each of our 17 Local Government Areas has at least one conservation area.
I have directed the Honourable Commissioner for Environment, Mr. Philemon Ogbonna, to work closely with the National Park Service and environmental experts to identify a suitable location for the proposed park. A dedicated team will be constituted to drive the process, ensuring its successful establishment.
Nature is something we cannot do away with. Sometimes, when we think we have overcome nature through technology, nature will still rise. That is why conservation is very important.
Beyond protecting our natural heritage, the National Park will create opportunities for employment, investment, revenue generation, tourism, and enhanced security. It will also help address the long standing absence of a National Park in the South-East.
I thank the National Park Service for this important initiative and congratulate ACG. Ugochukwu Michael on his elevation to the rank of Assistant Conservator-General.
We are committed to initiatives that promote environmental sustainability, protect our natural heritage, and create lasting opportunities for the people of Abia and South-East in general.
“Onyeaka Ozioma Elizabeth was spotted in the premises of the Federal High Court, Abuja and she informed me that she was arrested at 33 Onitsha, Anambra State over 5 years and 3 months ago by the DSS and dumped in WAWA MILITARY DETENTION CENTER IN KAINJI, NIGER STATE WITHOUT ACCESS TO HER FAMILY or lawyer. Her sister, whose phone number Ozioma Elizabeth gave to me when contacted could not believe that Ozioma Elizabeth was still alive until she saw this video. What manner of trial or justice can come from such illegal and dehumanizing detention? See fear written all over her face. Brought from Anambra to KAINJI, NIGER STATE, to Abuja; towns and cities she has never been to and away from everything that she knows, to face trial. Trial for being Biafran? Why nobody has ever faced trial for being Oduduwa and certainly none will ever face trial for being Arewa. Nigeria, a country of injustice.” - By Barr. Nnaemeka.
The young engineers have started the process of building their drones in Enugu.
Some of these children are from remote villages. They are willing but lacked access. We have given them access.
The future is exciting for our children.
Kayode Williams built a drone from scratch, and he is just 20 years old.
He arrived in Enugu today and will be with us for the next 4 weeks to teach our children how to make real-life drones from scratch during the bootcamp.
What we want to solve is making low-cost drones to improve security in the East and also to dispatch emergency items like pallets, drugs, and other supplies.
These 4 weeks are going to be hot in Enugu.
We have geniuses hidden everywhere, and we will create millions of them in a few years.
As an IT student in 2019, my stipend was ₦14,850. I bought an 8kg gas cylinder, fill it, and still had some money left. (about ₦3,000)
Today, even with a ₦50,000 IT students' stipend, you will not be able to do the same.
Government should not measure economic progress by nominal income alone. The real question is: what can the income people earn actually provide for them?
The true measure of an economy is purchasing power, the value people's earnings have in meeting their needs and improving their standard of living.