Lord Scarcity

If society restructures as winner takes all, coping failure rates approach unity. Despair is monotonic to scarcity. Therefore long despair.

[Lord Scarcity @lordscarcity]

@JodieWoahdie you’re retarded if you think men envy prostitutes

men envy the fact that women can generate value from existing… men have to generate value from producing

nobody envies being a fleshlight for desperate men… they envy the ease of access to resources

[Lord Scarcity @lordscarcity]

men and women are not the same…

a man who sleeps around is doing what men evolved to do… spread seed with minimal investment

a woman who sleeps around is doing what women evolved to do only under specific conditions… securing genetic quality and resources

[AshleY @Aku_700]

Men will sleep with as many women as possible, brag about body counts like a video game score, and get high-fives for ‘playing the field,’

but when a woman enjoys her sexuality and has the same freedom, society labels her a slut, questions her value, and acts like she’s damaged goods.

[Lord Scarcity @lordscarcity]

@NEETzscheIDDQD women dont have critical thinking they have rationalization engines that justify whatever they already want to do

and what they want is to extract resources from stable men while fucking attractive ones to cope with their insecurities

[NEETzsche @NEETzscheIDDQD]

Reminder that when women use "average" they don't mean the actual statistical median but the minimum that they will accept, which it is usually quite above average. So the "average Joe" she's talking about is actually in the top 80% of men. Pic related.

[Lord Scarcity @lordscarcity]

you’re actually retarded if you think hypergamy is a modern invention

the fact that violence existed doesnt mean women had no preference... it means preference was suppressed but not eliminated

ts denial

[Othman Mekhloufi @OthmanMekhloufi]

The common myth of “hypergamy” being “natural” or historic is debunked by the reality of violence. In a state of nature, and at all previous civilizational times before the last 200 years, there was either no female mate choice at all or very little of it. This was either due to rape, murder (of both men and women), or highly restrictive marriage practices. Female mate choice only exists where both violence is prohibited and women’s freedom is protected simultaneously. This type of world has only existed for maybe a century. If all these newfound “Nieztschean” “hypergamy”-maxxers “retvrn” to 3500 BC they will not witness Stacys “choosing” to reproduce with Chads in harems while filtering out everyone else. They will witness brutal violence. There are no incels in 3500 BC: there are eunuchs, those who have successfully reproduced, and those who died. The selection event was murder, not women’s choice. And non-Chads would reproduce very frequently by use of their own violence against women. Materializing the paradigm of “female mate choice is what nature intended”requires feminism… definitionally meaning it is not natural. The idea that hypergamy and female mate choice is “natural” and historic is wrong.

The fundamental question most are seeking an answer to is “what was reproduction like in the state of nature? How did nature intend for us to reproduce?” The answer is nature had no intention, and that the reality of natural human mating is that it was never based on female mate choice.

Civilization saves you from this brutality. Very odd that “Nieztschean vitalists” are advocating for a return to it.

[Rollo Tomassi @RationalMale]

Gynocentrism rests on the assumption that the female experience is the societally correct experience. The Red Pill is hated because it empirically strips the Blank Slate/Social Constructionist veneer off of that assumption. Men will never be fully human when the female experience defines what it is to be human.

[dmoon @dmoonlives]

Women will call you a pedophile for wanting a virgin wife because they lost their virginity the moment they hit puberty. The female mind associates virginity with childhood because that’s when they last had it.

[Lord Scarcity @lordscarcity]

@postmanShmerg where's the deontic axiom that lets u derive a permissibility claim about rape from a permissibility claim about killing

[Hereafter @idyllicmusing]

When a woman’s partner isn’t very sexually attractive, around her most fertile days she feels a stronger pull toward other men for their genes, while men unconsciously detect or respond to heightened infidelity risk and show more affection. Those with highly attractive mates didn’t show the same shift (potentially satisfied with in-pair “good genes”). Knowing this helps us choose partners and build family life intentionally. This also supports the idea that ancestral women may have pursued a mixed strategy—securing resources/commitment from a primary partner while seeking genetic benefits from extra-pair copulations during fertile periods, especially if the main mate fell short on “sexy” traits. It fits broader ovulatory shift research (e.g., preferences for masculine features, symmetry) but highlights conditional, partner-dependent effects.

[Lord Scarcity @lordscarcity]

its the logical endpoint of a system where female value is tied to youth and appearance and male value is tied to resources

why would a woman work a 9-5 when she can make 500k selling what nature already gave her and society already told her is her primary asset

[LT Jonathan Kendrick @PlisskenPatriot]

It’s actually insane how many attractive young women are literal escorts.

[Aristotle 🏛️ @Aristotle7777]

Pretty crazy that the end result of feminism is women becoming prostitutes.

[Lord Scarcity @lordscarcity]

@RealDianeYap women gatekeep sex to signal value then complain when men treat it like a transaction

if you have to perform disinterest to be taken seriously the system is already broken

men dont care about your "standards" they care about consistency… and women are anything but consistent

[Lord Scarcity @lordscarcity]

@zapatas_mom youre actually retarded if you think women are rejecting average men because theyre "badly behaved"

women reject average men because theyre average... period. the behavior excuse is just a convenient cover for hypergamy

[Lord Scarcity @lordscarcity]

@Womp_Tomp women cant be honest about hypergamy because it would expose the transaction… but not because of violence… because it shatters the romance narrative they sell to themselves and others

rejected men exist but the risk of violence is overstated as a shield for accountability

[Hereafter @idyllicmusing]

In a standard polygynous society, the top 12% of wealthy, high-status men might marry 3 to 4 wives each. Because the natural birth ratio of males to females is roughly 50/50, this mathematically leaves up to 40% of the male population completely shut out of the marriage market. Anthropological data shows that when societies transition from polygyny to enforced monogamy, crime rates drop, domestic violence decreases, and savings rates increase. Monogamy effectively flattens the social hierarchy so that almost every male has a stake in the future. This prevents a pool of low-status, unmarried, restless men from destabilizing the group. Some polygynous societies (e.g., in certain Islamic contexts) have long used tools like arranged marriages, cousin marriages, and strong family oversight precisely to keep marriage rates high, integrate men, and curb social outliers/crime. These pro-marriage mechanisms help fill the market alongside polygyny.

Recent PNAS research proposes that societies and governments maintaining strong pro-marriage norms have helped mitigate these issues. However, much of the broader evidence remains intact, including reduced extreme male competition, shifts toward paternal investment/savings/productivity, lower intra-household conflict in monogamous setups, and historical/cultural evolutionary advantages of enforced monogamy. These aren’t fully overturned.

[Auronhausen 💙💙💙 🧡🧡🧡 🏀🏀🏀 @Aurondarklord]

Muslim nations ban porn. They're unproductive shitholes.

South Korea banned porn. They have the worst birthrate on the planet.

Banning porn won't fix any of these problems because porn didn't cause them. Feminism caused these problems, porn is just men's coping mechanism. Get rid of feminism and porn use will naturally decline. Get rid of porn without getting rid of feminism and you just make everything worse because without a coping mechanism, men won't be able to cope.

There is absolutely no societal benefit in trapping men with no sexual outlet at all except to give modern feminist, hypergamous women whatever they want, and those women will only further inflate their standards once men have no escapes from their monopoly on our needs.

Anti-porn is anti-male. If you really want to fix the birthrate and increase productivity by giving men something to strive for, stop making marriage and fatherhood legal traps for men, stop letting women destroy men with unproven accusations, stop making flirting punishable, and do everything possible to bring women's standards back down to earth by making sure they have as much sexual competition as possible. MORE porn, MORE male gaze, legal brothels (like was the case throughout almost all of the history of western civilization, even Catholic luminaries like Aquinas argued they were necessary outlets for society to function, and it was only progressive, first wave feminists who screamed until they got banned), massive funding for the rapid development of sexbots.

A world in which women know that they'll die alone and unhappy if they don't nail down a man they can reasonably expect won't have a million better options while they're young and hot, then keep him satisfied and in love with them long term by keeping his stomach full, his balls empty, and not making him miserable, is a world in which these problems go away.

[Santy Vibes @SantyVibes_]

Female hypergamy isn't a choice.

It's survival programming.

She's biologically wired to find the highest value man possible because his status protected her offspring for millennia.

This isn't her being "bad." This is her being human.

But knowing this changes how you respond to her behaviour.

[Gaigous @Gaigous]

A lot of people are missing the point of this, you do not have to hold a principled anti-censorship position for the Left to deem you an enemy on the other side and therefore "one of our own", what you personally believe is irrelevant to how Political Warfare operates.

We have fully disavowed Yorch because he has established himself as a grifter anti, but the Left will forever act as if he wears our Team's Jersey regardless, they do not operate on universal principles, they have a tribal impulse for their civilizational plague and that's it.

[Lord Scarcity @lordscarcity]

@Gaigous the left doesnt care what you believe

they care what you can be used to represent

if you were ever adjacent to their enemy you carry the stain permanently

the only way out is to be so irrelevant that assigning a label costs more than its worth

[Octavian 🇪🇺 @posta_octavian]

Human biology is itself a "material condition".

It's an externality that constrains the societal conditions that could emerge.

In the same way a society's "material conditions" is influenced by the energy resources it has, it is likewise constrained by human biology.

Human biology is a certain way and therefore human culture will be a certain way to reflect that.

The communist/leftist attack on "human nature" doesn't come from Marx but is a deeper pre-rational spiritual belief, basically a kind of gnosticism, that assumes human individuals are in their essence identical souls which then get imprisoned by society and their physical bodies. If it weren't for this imprisonment, we'd all be equal and the same. And the leftist wants to return to this divine state of equality and overcome the Demiurge's "material conditions".