S I G M A

I have been working in crypto exclusively since 2013. God help me.

[S I G M A @lordsigma]

@blknoiz06 This is like when you toggle APR to APY

[S I G M A @lordsigma]

@R89Capital Bullish Louisiana

[S I G M A @lordsigma]

Semen retention is a psyop… hold your shit in while you’re at it see how that goes.

[S I G M A @lordsigma]

@iamkadense

[S I G M A @lordsigma]

@R89Capital So with you. It’s actually a little less doomer than it sounds though. It’s more conceptual of how antichrist was used to describe certain sociological outcomes/consequences. I want to see one of his talks so bad.

[S I G M A @lordsigma]

Many of the most libertarian Bitcoin purists I know who are die hard self custodians predominately use trading desks. Wonder what that says…

[S I G M A @lordsigma]

@PGATUOR It’s literally a fundraiser charity event for a navy seals foundation. Great group of guys.

[S I G M A @lordsigma]

@NUCLRGOLF It was a NAVY seal foundation fundraiser….

[S I G M A @lordsigma]

@DefiApes Your dollars in the bank are digital IOUs…

[S I G M A @lordsigma]

@TrustlessState Eh, UTXO pretty run of mill low effort cleanup

[S I G M A @lordsigma]

“(if that happened, the whole world would break, not just coins)” ive literally repeated this for years at talks I’ve given. We’ll have much bigger problems. Although one could argue if it did happen the first place to get hit would be crypto due to the speed of execution and contained collateral damage ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[S I G M A @lordsigma]

@R89Capital You should read Toly's post. You can keep txs private on there if you want. Bitget hackers just used retarded channels to do it. Anyways, I'm bullish and had to say my peace to you before up only mode. xoxo 👇

https://t.co/Y7prnFFqfU

[S I G M A @lordsigma]

Really important concept for you:

Confidential execution is not automatically the same thing as unlinkability.

NEAR being private doesn’t mean it magically makes public-chain entry/exit points untraceable. If $100 leaves chain A and ~$100 appears on chain B shortly after, timing + amount can still correlate it.

If the hackers were smart, they would’ve used NEAR Intents to route into a Zcash shielded pool, where the input/output link is actually broken. Privacy ≠ untraceability at every endpoint.

People are expecting NEAR intents to act like a mixer and it’s fucking retarded. We know what happens to mixers.

[S I G M A @lordsigma]

This is basically the vitalik post about SOL at the absolute fucking bottom before going directly vertical for the next two years.

[toly 🇺🇸 @toly]

Credibly neutral means you aren’t forced to participate in intents by the majority. You can run your own app or validator and do wtf you want.

Permissionless means anyone can participate in any part of the stack.

You aren’t entitled to the labor of others on any chain. Make your own blocks with whatever txs you want.

[S I G M A @lordsigma]

@XBToshi https://t.co/Su5dWCPHSe

[S I G M A @lordsigma]

Really important concept for you:

Confidential execution is not automatically the same thing as unlinkability.

NEAR being private doesn’t mean it magically makes public-chain entry/exit points untraceable. If $100 leaves chain A and ~$100 appears on chain B shortly after, timing + amount can still correlate it.

If the hackers were smart, they would’ve used NEAR Intents to route into a Zcash shielded pool, where the input/output link is actually broken. Privacy ≠ untraceability at every endpoint.

People are expecting NEAR intents to act like a mixer and it’s fucking retarded. We know what happens to mixers.

[S I G M A @lordsigma]

@extropic_vc You’re my favorite account on X by far right now

[S I G M A @lordsigma]

@R3st4rtY0urL1f3 https://t.co/Su5dWCPHSe

[S I G M A @lordsigma]

Really important concept for you:

Confidential execution is not automatically the same thing as unlinkability.

NEAR being private doesn’t mean it magically makes public-chain entry/exit points untraceable. If $100 leaves chain A and ~$100 appears on chain B shortly after, timing + amount can still correlate it.

If the hackers were smart, they would’ve used NEAR Intents to route into a Zcash shielded pool, where the input/output link is actually broken. Privacy ≠ untraceability at every endpoint.

People are expecting NEAR intents to act like a mixer and it’s fucking retarded. We know what happens to mixers.

[S I G M A @lordsigma]

@zacodil https://t.co/KHrNSxd3mQ

[S I G M A @lordsigma]

For those confused about $NEAR intents…

[S I G M A @lordsigma]

@mert help them help themselves

[S I G M A @lordsigma]

For those confused about $NEAR intents…

[S I G M A @lordsigma]

Really important concept for you:

Confidential execution is not automatically the same thing as unlinkability.

NEAR being private doesn’t mean it magically makes public-chain entry/exit points untraceable. If $100 leaves chain A and ~$100 appears on chain B shortly after, timing + amount can still correlate it.

If the hackers were smart, they would’ve used NEAR Intents to route into a Zcash shielded pool, where the input/output link is actually broken. Privacy ≠ untraceability at every endpoint.

People are expecting NEAR intents to act like a mixer and it’s fucking retarded. We know what happens to mixers.