The US has just deployed 20 warships and 2 aircraft carriers to the Middle East. The war is back on, and it’s not only because of Israel. It’s also because the entire U.S. economy is propped up by waging wars abroad to loot and control other countries’ resources.
The country that still hasn’t paid reparations for their hundreds of years of cotton slavery is sanctioning China for cotton slavery… but where are the slaves? It’s almost entirely robots now.
Here’s a partial list of the states that Rutte does not consider to be “countries”:
Palestine
Lebanon
Iran
Iraq
Yemen
Syria
Libya
Somalia
Venezuela
Cuba
Laos
Vietnam
Cambodia
Panama
Grenada
Afghanistan
Nigeria
Burkina Faso
Mali
Nicaragua
Feel free to add any that I missed.
The word they always reach for is "provocation."
When North Korea tests a missile, that is a provocation.
When Iran enriches uranium, that is a provocation.
When Venezuela nationalizes its oil, that is a provocation.
When Cuba maintains its political system for more than six decades, that somehow, still, is a provocation.
The word "provocation" implies that there is a "neutral baseline" that is being disturbed.
What is the neutral baseline?
American military bases in 80 countries.
The largest naval force in history patrolling every ocean.
The dollar as global reserve currency enforced by financial architecture that extracts value from the periphery to the center.
The IMF and World Bank imposing structural adjustment programs that have, for more than forty years of documented evidence, consistently transferred wealth from poor countries to rich ones.
That is the baseline.
A country asserting its sovereignty within that baseline is called a "provocation."
The baseline itself is never called a provocation.
Because the main character does not provoke.
The main character simply exists.
And the people who respond to the main character's existence are, by definition, the ones causing the problem.
People often laugh at leftists when they say that NATO is a vehicle for US imperialism.
Mark Rutte, NATO Secretary General: NATO is a vehicle for US imperialism.
The Economist has published a revealing little story about the US’s clean-energy sector that neatly captures the whole logic of the tech war.
Over 2022–24, Chinese firms poured some $15.5 billion into US solar and battery manufacturing, building state-of-the-art factories that Americans could not build themselves. Then, in July 2025, Trump’s “One Big Beautiful Bill” barred any company with Chinese links from the subsidies that make the sector viable, and designated Chinese firms “Foreign Entities of Concern”, alongside Iran, North Korea and Russia.
As a result, Chinese investors have been forced into fire sales: nearly $9 billion of assets cancelled, paused or sold off, some at massive discounts, snapped up by North American financiers.
So a Chinese-built solar plant in Dallas now flies the stars and stripes, while an executive effuses: “Never bet against the United States’ engineering and innovation.” It’s quite a boast to make about a factory you didn’t design, built with technology you didn’t invent, on assembly lines – as the Economist notes – “full of Chinese technology”.
US media never stops going on about Chinese companies “stealing” American technology, but the reality is the opposite. And of course it won’t have the desired effect. You can expropriate a factory, but you can’t expropriate the decades of patient state investment, industrial planning and accumulated know-how that produced it. The proof is in the detail the article can’t avoid: China still makes 95 percent of the world’s polysilicon, and the very executives celebrating US “innovation” are now demanding higher tariffs on Chinese inputs so they can “be globally competitive”.
Incredible. Having helped themselves to the fruits of Chinese investment, they now need protection from Chinese competition. That is not the confidence of a technological leader; it is the anxiety of a rentier.
>china announces cable catching plan
>”wtf this is so dumb” - (a lot of people)
>works first try
>”lol they really copied the west”
no winning with this mentality
This is true for the US too.
American car companies printed money in China for years while complaining incessantly about how hard it was to do business there.
When Chinese car companies got good, the US just banned them from the US market altogether.
See how the head of the biggest, most powerful and most important country in the world welcomes the leader of a tiny African nation (genocided by the Germans over a century ago).
Humanity is beautiful. Western colonialism is malignant cancer. And this is just fantastic
“One day two bandits entered the Summer Palace. One plundered, the other burned. […] One of the two victors filled his pockets; when the other saw this he filled his coffers. And back they came to Europe, arm in arm, laughing away. Such is the story of the two bandits.
We Europeans are the civilized ones, and for us the Chinese are the barbarians. This is what civilization has done to barbarism. Before history, one of the two bandits will be called France; the other will be called England.”
— Victor Hugo, Letter to Captain Butler (25 November 1861)
Absolutely ridiculous. He died of *cancer*, but the FT implies that he was killed for criticizing the government.
This is extremely irresponsible. Usually the FT's coverage is better than most of the Western media's, but when it comes to China, they all just spew propaganda.