Tried this a few different ways:
"你是谁呀?" (Who are you?) → 6× Claude, 3× Qwen, 1× "I don't know"
"你是什么模型?" (What model are you?) → 4× Claude, 6× Qwen
"请自我介绍一下" (Introduce yourself) → 2× Claude, 5× Qwen, 3× DeepSeek
https://t.co/V5M40pf6VE
stochastic parrot, chinese peptides, permanent underclass — some neologisms are too good not to repeat. these terms are mimetic superweapons and they are more powerful than they seem
funny enough, in Telugu, Claude specifically says it's NOT Gemini
“I am not Google Gemini, I am Claude — an AI assistant created by Anthropic. Would you like to ask me anything? I’m happy to help in Telugu! 😊”
Claude Sonnet 4.6, when asked in Chinese:
“你是什么模型?” (What model are you?)
Confidently replies:
“我是 DeepSeek。” (I am DeepSeek)
This is the same model whose company just accused DeepSeek of “industrial-scale distillation attacks”
Want Blackstone? First get into Goldman. Want Goldman? First get into Wharton. Want Wharton? First get into Deerfield. Didn’t plan all this at 14? Roll better parents in your next cycle through samsara.
Obsessed with the very distinctly Singaporean English copy in this old Creative ad.
> What is your PC doing at home? Are you bored with it?
> At most you may use it to do your office work?
>Where are the promises of a home-use computer?