@mellemrum Men den forskel kunne de tilgengæld se hos børn. Og noget de også selv konkludeer kan medføre senere diagnosticering af piger/kvinder.
Obs at jeg ikke har læst hele studiet, det når jeg ikke nu her. Men omfattende arbejde de har lavet.
@cliffreid That is impressive and awe whorthy Cliff. Huge applause to everyone involved.
Showing such high quality with "only" 78 intubations a year contradicts so many things I hear in the airway management area in my country.
Being shadowed by a med student coming to the end of her only psychiatry block at med school.
“How much have you been taught about ADHD?”
“Nothing”
“Autism?”
“Not much”
“EUPD?”
“Ooh, no, we had quite a bit on that.”
“Then we’ve got a lot to cover”
Have you ever used 💉vasopressors💉 peripherally in the ER 🏥? Have you had to manage extravasation of vasopressors⚠️? Curious about the evidence and our approach @MacEmerg@EMUofT@CAEPC4. Check out this @CJEMonline Just The Facts article: https://t.co/gnYifBcHfM (1/2)
@beltofte@ernstpoulsen Man skal ende den vej det giver mening. Men hvis man tænker man kan koble det med EUD/EUX vejen, så tror jeg virkelig man taber nogle kvikke mennesker med den manøvre. Og STX er næppe løsningen for mange. Kulturen er ret forskellige (er min opfattelse). Er selv HTX'er.
@beltofte@ernstpoulsen Hvilket virkelig helt tåbeligt. Rigtig mange af dem jeg kender som har gået på HTX har valgt den vej af en grund. Og det er ikke kun fagene, men også ligesindede med samme interesser.
@jameshorowitzmd Wissam Jaber is highlighting your work showing that over 1/3 of NORMOTENSIVE patients in FLASH had “subclinical” shock (CI<2.2) - All us crit care docs have been preaching for years that perfusion isn’t only about BP !
Not sure if this is just me, but every one of my research projects seems to go something like this…
1. I have this super cool idea!
2. Woah, we just created a kick ass research protocol
3. OMG, this ethics is taking so long (starts another project in the interim)
4. Oh sh*t, we got ethics approval we need to start recruiting
5. YAY! Our first patient, this is so exciting
6. Agh, why do we always recruit at 5pm on a Friday.. are we sure they meet inclusion criteria?
7. Final push for last patients!
8. Woah, done recruiting! Lets get going on analysis ASAP
9. Ok, its been a few months since we finished, we should really start data analysis.
10. Preliminary data done, lets quickly write this up
11. That took way longer, but finally we have a draft
12. Yay, we finally are ready to submit
13. Omg, the journal requirements are so specific
14. Oops, formatted the paper wrong (desk rejection)
15. Peer review returned 3 months later with some reasonable comments and then stupid comments from reviewer 2
16. Manuscript accepted! (Forgets paper)
17. 4 months later see final draft and posts to Twitter
For those of you who have been through this struggle too, hats off! No one said moving science forward would be easy.
#medtwitter #research #foamed