I’ve decided to start a blog! Primarily to practice writing and coding, but the content might be useful to others, so I’m sharing here. I’m open to feedback/suggestions if anyone’s interested! (I’ll just report any negative comments 🥰) https://t.co/MfyxDCYtCP
A short primer on #reproducibility by our team is now out at @Curr_Protocols, intended for researchers who want to get into some good repro practices. Covers transparent reporting of methods, data sharing, and much more! Read at: https://t.co/rSY6qeue92
I've created a shiny app to browse through all (now 3400) open science blog posts. There is a 'happening today' button. Among others, Rolf Zwaan in 2020 on sequential analyses https://t.co/TCub7potIT
For anyone who’s published systematic reviews, how often did you succeed in getting unpublished data by reaching out to authors? I don’t mean additional/IP data from published papers, but new data or data they could not get published.
I am stepping in as chair of IGDORE Sweden. Looking forward to taking IGDORE Sweden into the future together with affiliates and staff! My deepest thanks to outgoing chair Rebecca Willén for all she has done in founding the organization and building it to where it is today.
Does anyone know of any opportunities (research, industry, academia, etc.) for a recent college grad with a B.S. in Neuroscience (3.8 GPA - graduated two years early) and lots of research experience (western blotting, immunohistochemistry, cell culture, flow cytometry, ELISAs)?
For people who published/conducted Stage 2 registered reports, have you ever had issues that required significant deviations from the Stage 1 and how have you handled this? Are there any instances where this did not lead to rejection?
After @UniLeidenNews proactively caved to gov threats by shutting down our international psych BA program, our newsletter now includes this blog calling for defending academic freedom in...the US.
‘Don’t just give in; defend academic freedom’.
You do see the irony, right?
The meta-analysis on the relationship between Fluoride and IQ by Taylor et al. (2025) that RFK Jr. has cited contains major methodological flaws and data integrity issues that we describe in the following pre-print (submitted to meta-psychology): https://t.co/MwzGR9LvE9
@EmmyAnnaLu I think apple finder is driving it up for some reason, but it can’t be anything legitimate. I’m just refusing to update my phone so issues are arising😂
It's absolutely amazing the a PCIRR Stage 2 community endorsed manuscript automatically is accepted in a journal like Royal Society Open Science with no additional peer review needed.
Go PCIRR friendly journals!
https://t.co/KgnqDV0BmP
Why aren't there more journals joining?