@HacimMb See, the funny thing is that Molina exegetes those passages almost exactly the same as Calvinists because, y’know, we agree on God’s total sovereignty over human affairs. I’ve linked the relevant chapter below.
https://t.co/U4buqXdv31
Calvinists
> finding serious arguments against Molinism in the peer-reviewed literature
> when they realise all the good objections are from open theists
Disputation 49 of the Concordia is one of the best sections defining & defending middle knowledge. When properly understood, it’s clear why the “who is the card dealer?” zinger from pop-Calvinists isn’t a serious objection.
#calvinism#molinism
https://t.co/WfOPzohS66
“Through His natural knowledge, God comprehends Himself and in Himself, He comprehends *all the things that exist eminently in Him* and thus the free choice of any creature whom He is able to make though His omnipotence”
- Luis de Molina (Concordia, Disputation 49)
Disputation 49 of the Concordia is one of the best sections defining & defending middle knowledge. When properly understood, it’s clear why the “who is the card dealer?” zinger from pop-Calvinists isn’t a serious objection.
#calvinism#molinism
https://t.co/WfOPzohS66
@Caio4llmeida@proginosko There aren’t any! Haha, but really, “Molinism: The Contemporary Debate” has a good collection of pro and anti-Molinist papers. Robert M. Adams is also a good anti-Molinist author.
https://t.co/IoTp7Vw0m0
Disputation 49 of the Concordia is one of the best sections defining & defending middle knowledge. When properly understood, it’s clear why the “who is the card dealer?” zinger from pop-Calvinists isn’t a serious objection.
#calvinism#molinism
https://t.co/WfOPzohS66
Garcia, Juan; Leibniz on Contingency and Freedom: A Molinism... #Leibniz,Contingency,Freedom,IndividualConcepts,TheWill,Molinism https://t.co/enwyNNgw6i