@Paddy59755685@itsolelehmann Yeah get what your saying, but I think what legs give us is “counter balance on demand” (by leaning etc) which we could probably achieve but with the benefit of wheel traction
@lamxnt been doing for a while, its a shoehorn, but using Claude Code?Codex via CLI for marketing is just SO much better, you feel like a neanderthal doing it any other way.
@dawsbg Think when you really get down to it, you either buying authority lend, reach or creative output.
95%+ creators don't even know to price all of this, conversations with brands are doomed to be chance based.
I used to work in a 3rd party app discovery platform - It's honestly a hard problem, and Apple/Google has iterated a ton.
I think the problem + solution will largely remain, though we'll have agents to help find the right options. Which eventually, they'll have their own endless options.
Which will lead to explosion of value for distribution channels, or ads, and the game will be maximum optimization of unit economics.
Not much different than ecommerce + commoditized goods rn.
It's not a particularly enticing view for software products/devs, but it is what it is.
I do think we'll likely see existing and future apps thin slicing access for agents rather than humans, and we'll see new forms of monetization, for example, someone prompting your https://t.co/N6BCZHAoGF directly from an LLM, which rev shares a kickback to you.
So discovery will expand to capability, rather than single point landing pages, app pages, etc.
@VibeoGaemPapa@Aurelien_Gz Yes, very much so.
The choice of not designing it as a super car, not red, it’s all deliberate work around the larger brand that Ferrari is.
It was built to be its own thing, for its own audience, and not necessarily be in the line up.