Kevin Reddington, Lindsay Clancy’s attorney:
June 26: “She takes responsibility. She, as the kids say, she owns it. She’s not running away from anything here. This whole case is an extreme tragedy.”
Sept 8: “Look, she did a horrible, horrible thing. Can’t be worse.”
Yesterday: “There’s no evidence that she admitted she did this.”
Okay
You can in fact be opposed to the murder of innocent babies while supporting the execution of convicted murderers. There is absolutely no conflict between these two positions. And it's actually grotesque to suggest that there is one.
If postpartum mental illness becomes a get-out-of-jail-free card for murdering your children, then by logic, anyone diagnosed with it should lose custody of their kids.
We have legally slaughtered over 65 million babies in the last 53 years. The outpouring of support for a sadistic mother who deliberately slaughtered her own children is the direct result. Life has been so, so cheapened.
I don't think people realize it's not like on TV. It takes minutes to strangle someone to death.
Those babies fought for their lives. They likely tried to hit, scratch & struggle on instinct against their mother as they desperately tried to survive.
Imagine their terror.
Lindsay Clancy needs to rot. Screw anyone defending her.
There were no Neanderthals. There are no transitional species. There were Adam, Eve, and their children. There were animals who reproduced after their kind, and human beings made in God’s image, who reproduced after their kind.
I've seen the most reasonable women in my life vehemently defend Lindsay Clancy. It's a very strange situation. Every time I mention that 3 kids are dead, they say. "That's not the point."
Dang. I kinda thought it was.