@PhaylnxJoe@Mrgunsngear It’s just me but I see too many rights taken away and not given back. I feel like if we set a precedent for it with both sides someone might try to amend the first amendment or states will say it’s a state law and federal can’t to a thing. I want it stopped now.
A quiet bus ride through Rocky Mountain National Park turned into an unbelievably sweet moment.
A baby started clapping and cheering for no reason at all... and then, one by one, the entire bus joins in until every single person is laughing and clapping together.
So sweet ❤️
@PhaylnxJoe@Mrgunsngear Not a good idea. The law itself as it’s written should be challenged. We have a 1 A for a reason. We don’t want hate speech laws. You don’t want people going to jail because someone hurt your feelings. Who decides what is offensive and what is acceptable?
@krassenstein She may be an ass hole but calling someone a bad word shouldn’t make you a criminal. The same way you are allowed to say what you want as long as you don’t threaten/assault someone. It goes both ways. Enjoy your opinions and the freedom you have to express them.
@boxer4luvr@Mrgunsngear That’s why they should get rid of #3 in the law definition. It also goes against 1A. Someone who lives there should challenge it in court. Just my opinion.
@realtalktruthD@Mrgunsngear There is no such thing as hate speech only speech that you hate under the 1A. If she were to threaten someone then that’s assault & is entirely different than “hate speech” Being a hateful person without a call of action isn’t against the law either it just makes you an ass hole