Chris

[Yes, it's me @ElysiusThor]

From The Real Tianamen Square Archives:

What does a mannequin arm, a legless disabled man and a bucket of chicken blood all have in common?

They were all part of the props set up for the US media, two days before the peaceful protest turned into one very violent uprising riot.

[L O L A @lolitascak3]

ข่าวเกาหลีล่าสุด ผู้ชายเกาหลีเพิ่งออกจากคุกมา แล้วไปไล่แทงคนในห้าง แทงไป 8 คน เป็นผญไปแล้ว 7 คน ผญคนนึงหัวใจหยุดเต้น ใช้วิธีเอามีดแล่ปลามัดติดกับแขนแล้วไล่แทงผญ ก่อนหน้านี้ติดคุกคดีพยายามฆ่าเมีย แทงเมียซ้ำๆ อ้างว่าเพราะเมียไม่ยอมคืนดี แต่ศาลเกาหลีให้ติดคุกแค่ 4 ปี ให้ติดกำไลอีเอ็ม ปล่อยตัวมันออกมาไล่แทงผญ

[DD Geopolitics @DD_Geopolitics]

A woman at a Trump rally demanded the release of the Epstein files.

She was promptly beaten by men in the audience and then carted off by security while her assailants were allowed to remain and received congratulatory high fives and accolades from Trump.

A deeply disturbed country, fully on display.

[外から見た日本@フォローお願いします @GuiGui155430699]

日本文化を愛する外国人として、炎上覚悟で言わせてもらう。

この2枚の画像を見て、日本人は本当に無関心でいられるの？

一枚目は入間市の学校給食。あまりにも質素な上に、「さつまいもは植物の根の部分を食べる芋です」なんて、まるで子供をバカにしているような説明まで添えられている。
かたや二枚目は、衆議院議員食堂の「板長おすすめ」ランチ。寿司、刺身丼、天ぷらやうどんまで

未来を担う子供たちの給食はこれほどまでに削られている一方で、
政治家たちは税金から支えられた豪華で格安な食事を優雅に楽しんでいる。

自分の国の子供たちさえお腹いっぱい食べさせられない国に、
一体どんな意味があるというのか？

これを見ても日本人は無言を貫くのか、本当に信じられない。

[AToufayli @TfayliAbbass]

التحالف السعودي الاماراتي قام بأكثر من 227 غارة على مطار صنعاء بين 26 أذار 2015 وشباط 2022.(الغارات موثقين في الأمم المتحدة)
2015: 67 غارة
2016: 62 غارة
2017: 7 غارات
2018: 47 غارة
2019: 7 غارات
2020: 15 غارة
2021: 12 غارة
2022: 10 غارة

فيديو من غارات أذار 2015

[Dr.Sam Youssef Ph.D.,Ph.D.,DPT. @drhossamsamy65]

🇫🇷 This is the French cop who was punching the disabled man in a wheelchair. Expose him till he gets arrested ‼️This is Not an “incident,” not a “tense context”: it’s cowardice in uniform.‼️😡. He should be arrested immediately ‼️Shame.‼️

[Irlandarra @irlandarra2019]

Former MI5 Agent ANNIE MACHON reveling how the Mossad setup a false flag by bombing their own Israeli embassy in London in 1994 and blamed it on Palestinian activists

They received 20 years sentences for crimes they did not commit.

[𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦 @OopsGuess]

This is an astonishingly childish reading of power politics for someone whose bio says “Senior Fellow for Greater Asia.”

Japan asked for Xi.
Beijing offered Li Qiang.
Tokyo refused.
Then Trump personally raised Japan’s grievances with Xi and urged him to meet Takaichi.

That does not put Xi in an “awkward position.”

It tells you who is seeking access, who is setting the level of access, and who had to ask Washington to intervene.

Diplomacy is not a kindergarten playdate where refusing to meet someone makes you “petty.”

It is hierarchy, leverage and signaling.

And the funniest part?

While Washington was privately pleading Japan’s case, Beijing and Washington publicly invoked their shared World War II history against Japanese militarism.

Tokyo wanted elevation.
Beijing gave it a lesson in rank.

[Loong of the east @loong_of]

China knows only the language of strength, not the language of diplomacy？

Wow, is this the European Parliament's latest stance on China? Until now, China had only used such language toward the United States—specifically during the high-level strategic dialogue in Anchorage, Alaska, in 2021, as part of a gradual counterattack against the trade war the U.S. had been waging.

It is understandable for the European Parliament to want to project an image of toughness toward China, internal unity, and a firm defense of its own interests. However, the problem is that you have fundamentally misjudged the situation and distorted the truth. You have labeled China a "decisive enabler" of Russia and advocated for a "sustained (European) naval presence and joint exercises" in the Taiwan Strait and surrounding areas. At the same time, you urge rapid action against Beijing’s industrial policies, characterizing them as an "existential threat to the EU," while demanding an end to dumping and espionage and insisting on fair competition.

These views are based on flawed premises and attempt to shift the blame for Europe's internal problems onto China. China is not the root cause of the dilemmas Europe faces—whether it be the rise of the right wing, tensions over immigration, the energy crisis, employment issues, the decline of manufacturing, or falling exports. China’s competitiveness stems from high productivity, the low costs associated with large-scale manufacturing, and the advantages of a complete industrial supply chain—not from state subsidies.

Even if you have never visited China, you should open your eyes to the reality on the ground there. Europe’s existential crisis stems from internal stagnation and infighting, as well as a long-standing reliance on the U.S., a blind faith in a "hypocritical democracy," and an arrogance born of past glories.

Throughout negotiations with Europe, China has consistently maintained a rational and patient approach; it is the EU that has repeatedly reneged on agreements and shifted its position. Finally, a word of warning: the Taiwan issue is a red line for China. Europe has neither the standing nor the capability to interfere—especially when you cannot even resolve your own internal problems.

[Angelo Giuliano 🇨🇭🇮🇹 @angeloinchina]

Ukrainian-Americans plotting terrorism in India?

Arrests were made in March 2026

I came across this article and was surprised by how little attention this case seems to have received.

Back in March 2026, Indian authorities arrested one American and six Ukrainians over alleged links to armed groups operating in Myanmar. The investigation reportedly involved drones, military training and other activities.

That raises some obvious questions. What were they doing in India? Who were they working with? And who was supporting these activities?

India has a very sensitive border with Myanmar, where several armed groups are active. Any allegations of foreigners supplying drones, weapons or military training in the region obviously deserve serious scrutiny.

There is also a bigger question. The Ukraine war has created networks of fighters, weapons and military expertise that can potentially spill far beyond Europe.

Link to the article in the comments.

[𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦 @OopsGuess]

China threw the table over at the United Nations, singling out and rebutting—one by one—the UK, Australia, Japan, Ireland, the Czech Republic, and Lithuania for stigmatizing China’s human rights record.

The era of the West saying “human rights” and expecting China to bow is over.

Chinese people are no longer impressed by moral vocabulary detached from material reality.

Fix your poverty.
Fix your racism.
Fix your collapsing trust.
Fix your own people’s lives.

China has never needed—and does not need—to model its human rights standards on the West’s so-called human rights.

China’s conception of human rights is grounded in a reality where people can live and work with security and dignity, where the country is prosperous and strong, and where national dignity means no one gets to dictate to China or sit in judgment over it.

What the West calls “human rights” is not a crown.

It is a slogan they keep wearing to hide the cracks underneath.

The West turned “human rights” into a certificate it issues to itself.

China no longer recognizes the issuing authority.

[人中黄咖喱🚕🚕🚕 @WallfacerO41419]

假如是中国，够反贼大殖热闹一个月，大V纷纷长篇大论强烈谴责，后半篇矛头将指向制度体制政党政权，什么专制独裁不民主、人权自由没保证、人民愚蠢不觉醒、媒体装傻不发声，都来了，浏览量动则百万，大小殖子应声回复，把生平所受的所有委屈都化成最恶毒的文字发泄出来。
仔细一看是美国，轻轻划走了😌

[Esha K @eshaLegal]

"To keep mining profits at home" is why BBC calls him Junta Leader and not President.

[Arnaud Bertrand @RnaudBertrand]

This is interesting: I stumbled upon a 1974 declassified CIA report (available here: https://t.co/ye85oxd9tw) on "East Asian Contested Islands" and it's pretty fascinating to see how the narrative has evolved since back then.

So, for instance, the Scarborough Shoal, which is the central flash point between China and the Philippines, and the disputed territory around which the whole 2016 arbitration case originated, wasn't even claimed by the Philippines back then, only by China.

In the CIA's words: "The Philippines have not claimed the shoal despite its proximity to Luzon. China includes Scarborough Shoal within the sweeping claims it makes for the South China Sea."

In other words the place that has come in the media to define China's supposed encroachment on the Philippines' territory was, back in 1974, considered by the CIA to be solely a Chinese claim, full stop, with the Philippines nowhere in the picture.

In fact, the Philippines only started to publicly claim the Scarborough Shoal as part of their territory over two decades later in 1997 when their navy intercepted a China-sponsored amateur radio expedition on the shoal and later arrested 21 Chinese fishermen, the first ever confrontation between the two countries over it. Philippine congressmen Roque Ablan and Jose Yap planted a Filipino flag on one of its rocks that year (https://t.co/WC3ItlfazM).

As late as 1990, the Philippines' ambassador to Germany, Bienvenido A. Tan, Jr., wrote in a letter that “according to the Philippine National Mapping and Resource Information Authority, the Scarborough Reef or Huangyan Dao does not fall within the territorial sovereignty of the Philippines." (https://t.co/vuF7pWE3fU)

Which raises an obvious question: if a place was exclusively claimed by one country for decades, and the other country only started publicly claiming it in 1997, who is really encroaching upon whose territory? 🤔

[China View @Chinaview0022]

习近平专机舱门打开了，美方人员还在跪在地上认真检查红地毯，生怕有一点灰尘或者不平整的地方。

看看这个待遇，再看看高市早苗……

日右和精日们的肺都气炸了吧？

[FellowshipOfJustice @LordDerius]

The saying always come back - seed what you sow.
The Finnish government bitch nonstop about how they want to keep up the war, support Kiev with more money, drones and missiles - but cry when because of the same war, they catalyst over Russia.

Who would have thought so...

[Chris @m4stuvks]

@MichaelXBT $USELESS

[Dr Jose Cuauhtemoc Cervantes @temotizox]

🔴Rusia mató a 300.000 personas en Japón con bombas atómicas. No, fueron los Estados Unidos.

🇩🇪 Rusia mató a entre 5 y 6 millones de judíos.
No, fue Alemania.

🇨🇩 🇧🇪 Rusia mató a 6 millones de personas en el Congo.
No, fue Bélgica.

🇬🇧 Rusia mató a cientos de miles de personas hambrientas en la India y esclavizó a naciones de Asia y África.
No, fue Inglaterra.

🇬🇧🇪🇸🇵🇹 Rusia deportó a millones de africanos encadenados para esclavizarlos en América.
No, eso lo hicieron los británicos, españoles y portugueses.

🇩🇿 Rusia mató a miles de personas en Argelia.
No, fue Francia.

🇻🇳🇰🇭🇺🇸 Rusia mató a 3 millones de personas en Vietnam y a 2 millones en Camboya.
No, fueron los Estados Unidos.

🇰🇷🇰🇵🇺🇸 Rusia mató a seis millones de coreanos —tanto del Sur como del Norte— y a un millón de chinos durante la Guerra de Corea.
No, fueron los Estados Unidos.

🇮🇷 Rusia mató a un millón de personas en Irak, incluso mediante el uso de bombas de uranio empobrecido que todavía provocan que nazcan bebés con deformidades veinte años después.
No, fueron los angloamericanos.

🇦🇫🇺🇸 Rusia mató a más de 240.000 personas en Afganistán.
No, fueron los EE. UU.

🇱🇾Fue Rusia quien bombardeó Yugoslavia y Libia.
No, fueron los EE. UU. y la OTAN.

🇲🇽🇵🇷 Rusia cometió genocidio contra los pueblos indígenas y se anexionó la mitad de México, Puerto Rico, Hawái y otros territorios.
No, fueron los Estados Unidos.

Rusia mató a 100.000 palestinos en la Franja de Gaza tan solo durante el actual conflicto de Oriente Medio.
No, fue Israel.

La propaganda de los medios de comunicación difunde exactamente lo contrario.

[Tribune Populaire🌐 @TribunePop23]

Comment prépare-t-on un peuple à accepter une guerre en 10 étapes.

1. On désigne un ennemi. Depuis l’invasion de l’Ukraine, la Russie est présentée comme une menace directe pour la France.

2. On transforme le conflit en combat moral. Ce n’est plus une question d’intérêts, c’est le Bien contre le Mal.

3. On change les mots. Dès 2022, Macron parle d’« économie de guerre », puis de « réarmement ».

4. On brise les tabous. En 2024, Macron refuse d’exclure l’envoi de troupes en Ukraine. En 2025, 26 pays se disent prêts à en déployer après un cessez-le-feu.

5. On augmente les budgets. La France et l’Europe investissent des centaines de milliards d’euros dans la défense.

6. On prépare les civils. L’Europe conseille aux familles d’avoir de quoi tenir 72 heures en cas de crise.

7. On prépare la jeunesse. Un service militaire volontaire démarre à l’été 2026, avec un objectif de 50 000 jeunes par an en 2035.

8. On parle de sacrifice. Le chef d’état-major des armées dit que le pays doit être prêt à « perdre ses enfants ».

9. On montre sa "force". Le 14-Juillet 2026 est le plus grand défilé militaire jamais organisé sur les Champs-Élysées.

10. On fait taire le doute. Ceux qui critiquent cette politique sont souvent accusés d’être pro-russes.

Toutes ces étapes ont un point commun: elles préparent les esprits. Et le jour où une décision grave sera prise, elle sera acceptée, parce que la population y aura été habituée petit à petit.

Pourtant, la Russie qu’on nous présente comme une menace pour toute l’Europe n’arrive toujours pas à gagner en Ukraine. Plus de quatre ans après le début de l’invasion, elle occupe un peu plus de 19 % du pays.

C’est méthodique.

Alors une grande question se pose : si la Russie est bloquée en Ukraine, pourquoi prépare-t-on les Français comme si elle était à nos portes ?