“We found 146,000 kids so far. Some of these kids claimed that they were raped over 600 times. I don't care who you are. If you can't stand for law enforcement to go find these kids, who are you?” @SecMullinDHS
College essays should be abolished.
Universities should be actively selecting against strivers.
The third-world drive to sacrifice everything for credential signalling is antithetical to European ideas of a good life and needs to be fought everywhere.
California pediatrician shares his professional experience of the risks and benefits of vaccinating and not vaccinating children.
(00:00) Introduction to Dr. Bob Sears
(03:38) Outcomes of Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated Children in His 30,000+ Practice
(09:12) The Irony of Vaccination and Chronic Illness
(15:40) A Child on the CDC Schedule: 1986 vs. Today
(20:05) Vaccines Design to Modify the Immune System
(34:26) Understanding Vaccine Efficacy and Transmission
(48:22) Pediatric Experiences: Unvaccinated Patients and Disease Outcomes
(1:00:06) Health Benefits of Natural Infections
(1:10:43) The Impact of Vaccination on Herd Immunity
(1:12:28) Revising Vaccine Schedules: A Shift in Perspective
(1:18:28) Pediatric Experience with Unvaccinated Families
(1:22:40) The Shift in Parental Attitudes Towards Vaccination
(1:30:09) Infectious Disease Research and Real Data
(1:36:22) The Vaccination Shift and Parental Choices
@DrBobSears
Here's something many people don't know about me -
Before I publicly dissected the long list of problems in the 1619 Project, I contacted the New York Times through their official channels to request a series of corrections to unambiguous factual errors in its content. The editor - Jake Silverstein - brushed me off and refused any correction - a pattern he also exhibited toward other critics from across the spectrum.
Before I publicly broke the story about Kevin Kruse's plagiarism in Reason, I contacted Princeton's academic integrity officer and alerted him to the problems I had found, giving them a chance to respond and address it internally. They ignored my email and later claimed to have lost my email after I went public.
Before I published my findings on Quinn Slobodian's habitual manipulation of source materials to alter its plain meaning through misquotation, I submitted an article to Contemporary European History (the journal where the worst examples appeared), highlighting the problems with the passages and asking for a correction through their official process. They desk-rejected it, brushed me off, and falsely claimed that Slobodian's piece had been thoroughly vetted in peer review. In fact, one of their own referees had flagged the same problems over a year earlier and recommended rejection of the article.
Before I published an expose on Nancy MacLean & Sandy Darity's similar manipulation of W.H. Hutt quotations in their article for History of Economics Review, I (along with 2 coauthors) submitted a response comment to this journal asking for a correction through its official processes. The editor gave us a complete runaround where he imposed an arbitrary length limit requiring us to cut the content, sent the trimmed version to a referee, then rejected the piece because the referee said we didn't sufficiently address the very same things we were forced by the editor to cut. When I then asked the editor to issue a simple corrigendum to the most egregious misquotation (one that transformed Hutt's explicit attack on the racism of white Afrikaners into a defense of Apartheid), he refused and tried to pass it off as a difference of "interpretation."
Before I published an expose of a leading covid masking model in the Wall Street Journal, I sent a comment to the medical journal that published it alerting them to a math error that changed their entire set of results. The journal acknowledged the error was real but refused to publish my piece on the grounds that the "next release" of the model would be updated to reflect it - even as politicians up to and including Joe Biden were trumpeting the erroneous results all over the news.
As someone who covered the region for a dozen years for the WSJ, and reported in astonishment how even under conservative Pres Ronald Reagan USAID was funding socialist projects in Latin America, I can assure you that this is 💯 accurate.
Carole Hooven—my fellow contributor to "The War on Science"—was mobbed at Harvard for saying there are two sexes.
Cowardly admins threw her under the bus.
In the CBC doc "Speechless", she reads their letter with appropriate contempt.
They broke his bones, gouged his eyes out, cut out his tongue and castrated him. He died of a heart attack after being set on fire and dragged himself 50 meters across the floor.
Henry Nowak died the same way a civilization dies: abandoned, handcuffed by authorities who neither trusted nor cared for him, and accused of hate crimes he did not commit. His murder is as tragic as it is enraging. He should still be alive today, and he would be if the last few generations of European elites had stood their ground against the politics of self-hatred and the mass invasion of migrants, many of whom despise the West and the people who love it.
Henry was far from the first to so needlessly lose his life, and I fear he won’t be the last. Each time a life like his is lost, the proper response—the only response—is righteous anger. One of the most important things the Trump administration has proven to the world is that stopping the flow of mass migration and defending national sovereignty is a matter of political will and leadership. Anything else is an excuse.
It is because we love the West that we want to preserve it. We love our civilization. We love our country. We love our children. And nobody—nobody—should ever die the way that Henry Nowak died. May God comfort those who loved him, and may God rest his soul.
@OwenGregorian paragraphs, you don't flip back to a previous section to clarify what you are reading now by going back and forth between the two. A real book gradually teaches you how to read, and how to manage the information. There are a lot of bad things going on and e-books are one of them.
@OwenGregorian I want to mention e-book learning. It doesn't surprise me that kids struggle with the basics of reading after spending their formative years using e-books. Nothing about it is the same as reading a real book. You don't touch the book, you don't flip back, you don't reread (1)
Every Republican campaigned on keeping men out of girls sports. We made a promise to our voters. But now instead of delivering on those promises, Senate Republicans are caving to Democrats.
I cannot support any bill on college sports that doesn’t include these basic protections and will vote No on the Protect College Sports Act. This is our one chance to get this done, we have to deliver.