@Clarksterh@AJ_FI On ones that are *supposed* to launch, yes. On one that was supposed to be bolted to the ground? Well, you generally don't put high explosives on something if you can avoid it.
@dlagunas@davidleavitt "Make life take the lemons back! Get mad! I donโt want your damn lemons, what the hell am I supposed to do with these? Demand to see lifeโs manager! Make life rue the day it thought it could give Cave Johnson lemons!"
@sebastiangood@zackhargett@Adrian_H If I hire a dude and tell him 'Here's the Beatles complete discography; listen to it all then write me a new song in the same style', neither of us owes John Lennon a cent beyond what we paid for the CDs. Why should it be any different if I use a computer to do the same?
@surt_lab (Of course, science can be both, e.g. 'we set out to prove X, and (did|didn't), but along the way we noticed Y which is interesting and deserves additional study.') 3/3
@surt_lab Affirmative science *must* have a clear hypothesis and analysis plan in advance. P-hacking is when you do exploratory science then present it as affirmative. 2/3