@StretfordPaddck@JayMotty But if his stock is this high does it not make sense for united to utilise him as a squad player while he is in contract? I think the only way we should sell is if we get upwards of £50m.
@Unitedtalk26 Any thoughts on whether we keep him? Im considering a full u-turn given we shot ourselves in the foot accepting that we'd let him go for 26m. We should be getting at least 55m+ in this market. We need a squad for UCL after all.
@StretfordPaddck They could offer 115....its also a timely reminder for @FA_PGMOL to pull their finger out and do something about our corrupt.....I mean noisy neighbours.
If you don’t understand that any crime by a brown person is being exponentially amplified as the majority of white crime is ignored, then I don’t have the crayons to explain it.
A white “patriot” was jailed for the racially aggravated rape of a Sikh woman recently.
Crickets.
Even when adjusting for inflation, Pep Guardiola still outspends Sir Alex Ferguson by £40m per season on players.
During his historic tenure from 1992 to 2013, Sir Alex actually ranked as only the 4th highest spender in the Premier League, trailing behind Chelsea, Manchester City, and Liverpool. Despite this, he comfortably outperformed his rivals. This financial efficiency was even more pronounced in the EPL in the 1990s "his most dominant era" where he captured 14 trophies while Manchester United ranked a mere 10th in league spending.
By contrast, Pep's Manchester City ranks as the 2nd highest spender in the league during his tenure, situated just behind Chelsea, do we think Pep Guardiola could have won his 20 trophies if he had only spent the same as Wolves or Everton in the last decade?