Software going headless is inevitable in a world where agents use the tools 100X more than people do. And the reality is for a lot of software this is actually a huge boon to potential use-cases for these platforms.
Software business models have largely been predicated on selling to the number of seats that are in the company in a given function, and the usage of your software is constrained by how much people can do in a given day. This means that your technology is often vastly underutilized relative to what it actually can power for the customer.
Enter: agents. Agents can work 24/7, run in parallel, and string together work across systems. This is a big deal because now the agent can do far more than people ever could with these tools. Instead of reviewing contracts one by one, the agent will review all of them. Instead of manually moving data between marketing systems and across campaigns, the agent will let you run 10X more of them. Instead of being rate limited in a client onboarding process by human steps, agents accelerate these.
Agents end up using these underlying platforms far more than people ever did, which opens up use-cases that the platform couldn’t go after before.
Now, not every software market has the same amount of positive sum use-cases between people and agents, but I’d argue that a significant portion of systems of record, for instance, can be used far more than they are today. Your Salesforce data can be leveraged 100X more to do vastly more customer targeting and sales automation. Your documents can be turned into structured data and analyzed for insights and knowledge to automate other workflows. And so on.
Now, of course you have to find a way to make this all commercially attractive, but it’s not hard to picture the revenue from API and agent consumption on these platforms becoming a rich component of revenue streams over time. Seats for the people, consumption for the agents. Lots of upside here for the companies that embrace this trend.
How to QA AI responses:
1. Ask for evidence for one LLM's claim to another
2. Ask for a confidence score (on a scale)
3. Ask another LLM to critique the response
Over the last 70 yrs there's never not been a recession following a peak in interest rates. Unemployment is a key, sometimes lagging, indicator. Today, it's only been rising since mid-2023. We should expect a recession on/before 2030.
I am excited about what my company is doing. We're driving a new wave of progress with AI ambient listening technology. This evolution reflects @modmed 's commitment to reducing the administrative burden on healthcare providers and improving patient experiences.
Since Q2 2025, we've seen an acceleration in unemployment for Hispanic/Latino and African American workers compared to white people. It's also a historical trend that white people consistently experience far lower unemployment than the other two groups.
Since ~2000, except for recessions, men tend to be unemployed at higher rates than women. I'm not sure if this refers to the total population or only people seeking work. However, this aligns with the narrative that more women are remaining employed (healthcare, teachers, etc.)