@elonmusk@xai@X Something that has turned into trash is being sold to another that hasn’t even made trash. Nothing but a billionaires tax and loan evasion step.
#Match2024#MatchDay2024#InsideTheMatch National Trainee Collaboration- RRR: Residency/fellowship, Research, Relentlessness! Come join us this Friday from 1.30 PM-2.30 PM. @SarjuGanatraMD and I are excited to meet you!
@theJagmeetSingh@GurratanSingh So as Canadaian government representative, are you encouraging separatist and terrorist events in anotjer sovereign republic? Want to join NK and Iran on the terrorist enabler lists?
@welfareofanimal, what is your suggestion to deal with this. Three years ago you were against stray dogs being cleared from the area. Even a single life lost is unacceptable. Street Dogs Killed young Boy : నాలుగేళ్ళ చిన్నారిని చంపేసిన వీధికుక్కలు… https://t.co/nAX9MKgGBp
@elonmusk Job of the Press is to report facts. Trustworthiness is what they should strive for. Belief is for things you cannot be certain about, like God or ‘smart’ people. Actively believing untrustworthy Press in my belief is not so smart.
@elonmusk Seems like the Tesla and Space X boards have spoken. What a sham of a poll. Realized you staying here risks Tesla stock. Watch out for Tesla stock rally tomorrow once he steps down from CEO here.
@Belevie15 @MartyMakary@VPrasadMDMPH Exactly, the paper doesn’t say that ‘all are’. It identifies a signal. That’s how science works. Their n was in millions, your n likely countable on your hands. That is why scientific critique needs practice and time.
@BjorklundGordon @VPrasadMDMPH Strict rules. That’s got nothing to do with this paper. Scientific reviews need to remain unbiased and not all have the critical thinking for this. Sad to see some of the greatest critical thinkers out there @VPrasadMDMPH fall into clickbait schemes.
@BjorklundGordon @StevePhillipsMD@VPrasadMDMPH Yes, assumptions/suggest from a basic quality science paper (again there were no errors in the study) are wrong, but your personal opinions about presumed ‘most discriminated’ group are accurate. Got it. Critiquing science needs personal bias out of the equation. That’s my point
@PigbirdJetFan@VPrasadMDMPH You do realize it already is part of business, right? Prior DUI’s, young drivers with new permits, old drivers, certain Zip codes, etc.
@VPrasadMDMPH A retrospective observational study has plenty of limitations and the paper does admit limitations. The vile subpar and unprofessional critiques by ‘experts’ trying to create content has made this another divisive issue.
@VPrasadMDMPH I presume you read the paper and notice that recommendation was for PCP discussing standard road safety precautions with all patients. Insurance companies using this information was hinted, not recommended. Why keep blowing the dog whistle?
@StevePhillipsMD@VPrasadMDMPH No, he suggests discount for people who are vaccinated. Big difference, words matter. Insurance loves low risk groups, akin to non smokers getting a discount. Logging regular exercise, annual check-ups earning a discount.
@VPrasadMDMPH Exactly what, just two options, little extreme, don’t you think? There are people who will fall on a range of risk tolerance and majority would like stay in a happy medium.