mc

The left left me-
keep men out of women sports, prisons and spaces. No gender ideology in schools

[mc @maherwalsh]

@BaddCompani I am taking comfort in this - we can do this
https://t.co/AfUK9NSalU

[Claire Hallissey @HallisseyC]

In my last parkrun as a female, I ran in the women's 40-44 category. I lost out on 1st overall female to somebody who won a 3rd place trophy in the men's 30-34 category in last season's X-country. This is what parkrun's warm and fuzzy inclusiveness looks like. 🤷‍♀️🤯

@RRRunnersUK

[Marie Hurabiell, Yes on G 🩷 No: B, H, & RTM @MHurabiell]

I'm being inundated with ads about how "Scott get's shit done" ... it's true: 90% of what he does is shit.

He's actively damaged public safety, parents, children and women. & let's not forget, he opposed Prop 36 & threw his own people under the bus for votes.
@micsolana @kane

[Erica Sandberg 舊金山的神奇女俠 @EricaJSandberg]

Absolutely repulsive. To see anyone being treated this way for doing nothing more than wearing a shirt depicting female chromosomes is horrifying. But when it’s someone you know and respect? Infuriating. I support Julie. And I just purchased a shirt.

[Brandi Kruse @BrandiKruse]

In 2026, this is how women are treated for peacefully standing up for their rights. There was no way I was going to leave that stadium of my own free will. We did nothing wrong.

[Jonathan Choe @choeshow]

PR disaster for @ThornsFC.

[SFTC @SFterfcentral]

We got into a @lyft after being assaulted & ejected by @ThornsFC . One of our party is disabled w/a walker. The driver started the ride & then asked us if we were "the ones in the news" from the game. One of us said yes, & he immediately stopped the ride 1/n

[XX-XY Athletics @xx_xyathletics]

The DOJ has entered the chat.

[The Vigilant Fox 🦊 @VigilantFox]

A Planned Parenthood doctor tries to lecture Matt Walsh on child gender identity and insists even babies understand gender.

Then he asked her about Santa Claus, and it was over.

MICHELLE FORCIER: “There’s research and data that show that babies and infants understand differences in gender. Some children figure out their gender really early...”

WALSH: “Have you ever met a 4-year-old who believes in Santa Claus?”

FORCIER: “Mhm.”

WALSH: “So, this is someone who believes that a fat man is traveling through the sky on a flying reindeer at lightning speed coming down his chimney with presents.”

FORCIER: “Yeah.”

WALSH: “Would you say that this is someone who maybe has a tenuous grasp on reality?”

FORCIER: “They have an appropriate 4-year-old handle on the reality that’s very real for them.”

WALSH: “Agreed. Agreed. But Santa Claus is real for them, but Santa Claus is not actually real.”

FORCIER: “Yeah, well, and but Santa Claus does deliver their Christmas presents.”

WALSH: “Well, yeah, but he’s not real, though.”

FORCIER: “To that child, they are.”

WALSH: “When I see a child who, you know, believes in Santa Claus, and then let’s say this is a boy and he says, ‘I’m a girl.’ This is someone who can’t distinguish between fantasy and reality, so how could you take that as a reality?”

FORCIER: “I would say that as a pediatrician and as a parent, I would say how wonderful my 4-year-old and their imagination is.”

Most 4-year-olds can’t even tie their shoes. We don’t let them cross the street alone, pick their bedtime, or choose what’s for dinner. But she thinks they’re mature enough to decide they’re “in the wrong body.”

The most terrifying part about this lady is that she’s also an Assistant Dean of Admissions at Brown University.

She’s not just affirming fantasy as reality in her own practice. She’s helping hand-pick the next generation of doctors — ones who think just like her.

[Riley Gaines @Riley_Gaines_]

It will never cease to amaze me that a shirt with male and female chromosomes is considered problematic, yet a shirt featuring a knife and a thinly veiled threat somehow isn’t.

[Brandi Kruse @BrandiKruse]

We are owed swift apologies.

@AlliedUniversal
@ThornsFC
Peregrine Sports

[Steve Hilton @SteveHiltonx]

LOS ANGELES: I can't tell you how many times I've had an interaction just like this...

"I'm a Democrat. But I know California needs change. So I'm voting for YOU."

Let us know if you're one of the @DemsForSteve 👇

[Jamie Reed Whistleblower @JamieWhistle]

At a certain point can democrats- at bare minimum- remember to care about free speech?

[Riley Gaines @Riley_Gaines_]

The trannies can have their flags and wave them in your face, but you can't wear a shirt highlighting biological reality because it could offend them.

Free speech means nothing to these activist organizations.

[Brandi Kruse @BrandiKruse]

I was just forcefully removed from a @ThornsFC game for the crime of wearing an @xx_xyathletics t-shirt. I am in shock. We peacefully wore our shirts. We were assaulted by fans. Then WE were forced to leave – with FORCE by stadium security. I am utterly in shock.

[Lady Laughingloudley @blah_blablather]

Let’s be clear:
If I’m not going to sleep with you, I don’t need to know anything about your sexuality.
And children—who are not going to sleep with anyone—certainly don’t.
Your sexuality is not sacred. It’s not a personality, it’s not a protected class of performance art, and it’s not the center of anyone’s moral universe but your own. Unless we are in a relationship, I am not obligated to acknowledge, affirm, or be exposed to your private desires—especially not in public, and especially not in front of children.
This used to be understood. Now it’s called hate.
No, We Don’t Owe You an Audience
Sexuality belongs in the private realm. It is intimate by definition. If you feel compelled to wear your kink on your sleeve—or on a float, or in a first-grade classroom—you are not inviting understanding, you are demanding submission. You are violating others’ right not to participate.
Consent doesn’t vanish because your fetish is “progressive.” If anything, the burden is higher.
No one consents to being flashed on the subway. No one consents to a stranger’s arousal. No one consents to a stranger telling their child about masturbation, kink, gender identity, or pornographic categories under the guise of “inclusive sex ed.” Yet all of this is happening now—in public parks, in classrooms, in televised programming.
It is not tolerance. It is invasion.
Children Are Not Here to Validate You
Children are not queer. Children are not sexual. Children do not need to “see themselves represented” in a spectrum of adult desire. This idea—that identity is only valid if sexualized and mirrored—is narcissism, not pedagogy.
There is no legitimate reason to initiate a child into the language of sexual preference, gender identity, or alternative lifestyles. The only people who benefit from that dynamic are those looking to normalize boundary violations.
Let me state it plainly:
Children who are not going to have sex do not need to be exposed to sexuality.
Period.
Any adult who insists otherwise is not confused. They are grooming.
Public Fetishism Is Not Liberation
There is a vast difference between being gay and demanding the right to simulate sex acts in front of children. Between being transgender and insisting on teaching kindergartners about breast removal. Between being proud of who you are and insisting the whole world observe your kink play in the street.
This is not diversity. This is decay.
Men in dog masks being walked on leashes by their lovers are not brave—they are forcing strangers into their psychodrama. This is exhibitionism, and when children are present, it becomes criminal exhibitionism.
We used to know this. Peeping, flashing, voyeurism—these were considered red flags. Dangerous behaviors. Early signs of escalation. Now they’re filmed, hashtagged, and funded by public grants.
Stop Calling It Love—It’s Entitlement
This is not about who you love. It’s about how you demand to be seen. If you need the entire public to witness, applaud, and adapt to your sexuality, you’re not a pioneer—you’re an emotional colonizer.
Love does not demand a captive audience. It does not parade past toddlers. It does not demand that schools teach four-year-olds about “preferred pronouns.” Love protects children. Love guards modesty. Love waits.
And if you can’t wait—if you need to be seen, affirmed, and obeyed—you’re not talking about love. You’re talking about power.
Consent Applies to Culture, Too
We teach children that consent is sacred—so why are we failing to apply that lesson to public life?
No child consents to drag queen story hour.
No parent consents to leather harnesses on city floats.
No woman consents to being exposed to male sexuality in the ladies’ room, or in the school library, or anywhere she cannot opt out.
Consent is not just for sex. It’s for everything.
Attention. Language. Presence. Ideology. Imagery.
And we are done pretending we don’t notice when it’s violated.
The boundary is back.
And we are drawing it in bold.

[T Wolf 🌁 @Twolfrecovery]

San Francisco Supervisors got duped into supporting an illegal alien gang member of the Sureños who had a manslaughter conviction and beat his ex-wife nearly to death all because ICE arrested him? Bruh.

[💥Susan Dyer Reynolds🗞️ @SusanDReynolds]

Supervisors and Mayor Lurie take heed: your constituents are tired of your virtue signaling and refusal to work with the Feds to deport violent repeat felons and fentanyl dealers. And as you see in this article, they will speak however they can — in your case, at the ballot box.

[J.K. Rowling @jk_rowling]

The thing is, @IndiaWilloughby, I really do enjoy cigars, whisky and facing down totalitarians, so by the same arguments that make you a woman, I am indeed Winston Churchill.

[Anna Lulis @annamlulis]

9-month-old Down syndrome baby lights up saying his first word

67-90% of babies with the condition are aborted in the US

“He is blessing us in unique ways” says the little boy’s mom

Every child with an extra chromosome is worthy of life

[Dan Burmawi @DanBurmawy]

Tonight, as I was leaving a restaurant on 14th Street in New York around 10 p.m., this Muslim woman took a prayer rug and a niqab out of the trunk of her car, put the niqab on, laid the prayer rug down, and started praying on the street.

I grew up as a Muslim in the Islamic world, and let me tell you: this is absolutely part of an organized effort to flood the public square in the West with Islamic symbolism.

First of all, there is no Islamic prayer at 10 p.m. Even if she missed the Isha prayer, which takes place earlier in the evening, she has until dawn to make it up. So why choose to pray on the street at 10 p.m.?

Second, a Muslim woman who does not wear a niqab or hijab in her daily life would never normally have a niqab sitting in the trunk of her car.

She is clearly not strict enough to wear it every day, so why would she suddenly be so strict about missing a prayer that she carries a niqab in her trunk specifically for this purpose?

Third, in almost any Islamic country, you would never see a woman praying on the street at 10 p.m. This would be completely unacceptable.

If she were genuinely worried about praying, she could simply wait until she got home, especially since a missed Isha prayer can be made up before dawn.

I can tell you with full confidence that these scenes we keep seeing of Muslims praying in the streets of the West are intentional.

They serve to assert dominance, normalize Islam in the public square, seize ground, and demand exceptional treatment that immediately turns into claimed rights.

Bad-faith acts like this are signals of the same project that turned many cities in Europe into shitholes.

Exceptional threats demand exceptional measures.

Islam must be banned in the West because it is not a religion; it is a hostile political ideology.

Until that happens, the West will continue losing ground to this ideology every single day.