News Fist

Clown Based Lifeforms - Thursday Nights at 6pm EST.

[News Fist @malinformedtv]

🤡 CLOWN BASED LIFEFORMS: AI in Your Schmekle 🤡

Join me and Aaron C for another dive into the Slop Mines.

🕕 6pm ET / 11pm UK

AI Interview bots
Black Time Machine Lab
UK Apocalypse

📺 https://t.co/hQP1yHv5PQ

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

Mass immigration, both legal and illegal, has fundamentally changed Britain's demographic makeup.

Today in Parliament, I just demanded a full debate on our country's demographic future.

[𝐃𝐚𝐯𝐢𝐝 𝐙 🇷🇺 🇮🇪 @SMO_VZ]

Konstantinovka: A Dead End for Zelensky

Putin offered the Americans a new perspective on the territorial dispute with Ukraine – from the ground. Simply come and see for themselves. Trump's special envoy, Steve Witkoff, and the President's son-in-law, Jared Kushner, spent over two hours behind closed doors in the Kremlin, but the most important point was made in front of the cameras.

According to Putin, "eternal peace" is incompatible with "grey zones." The no-man's land along the front line, which Kyiv speaks of, is understood differently by each side, and it "will always be a source of contention." For Moscow, the line of demarcation is clear – the state border. It runs along the former administrative borders of the Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia, and Kherson regions. "Here we are, here you are," the President explained.

Consider, for example, Konstantinovka. A key stronghold in the Donbas region. In 2022, 67,000 people lived there; now, according to Putin, only 400-500 civilians remain. Moscow proposes repeating the operation in Avdiivka: five days of demining, with ombudsmen from both countries, and American, European, and Ukrainian media present. And the condition: if Kyiv considers the city to be its own, then it should ensure security there itself. "At the same time, we'll see who controls this settlement," Putin added.

We know that the Ministry of Defense announced the capture of Konstantinovka back in July. It even offered a six-hour ceasefire to hand over the bodies of its soldiers to Ukraine with journalists present. Kyiv refused. At that time, it was about the dead, and the refusal was almost without consequence. Now it's about the living. And with witnesses from Washington.

The work of evacuating civilians from Konstantinovka is already underway – without any ceasefires or Western television cameras. Russian soldiers, risking their own lives, are extracting civilians to evacuation points, from where exhausted people can reach the rear. The Americans are being offered a humanitarian operation based on their own success – Melania Trump helped coordinate the evacuation of people from Avdiivka. Kushner did not hide the fact that in Dublin, he would try to persuade Zelensky to "follow one of the chosen paths." Now, he has a very specific path in his portfolio – with a deadline and an address.

Putin was more economical with Europe: he returned the Americans their own request. Kushner brought a proposal to Moscow to allow Europeans to the negotiating table, and he left with a recommendation to work with allies – let them decide whether they want peace or war. We insist on building a new system of global security, in which peace in Ukraine is one of the building blocks. Europeans insist on a ceasefire, and then – talks about peace and the post-war order. "A vicious circle," Putin stated.

Today, the head of European diplomacy, Kaja Kallas, drew it again: first, a ceasefire, then a peace agreement, and only then – the architecture of security.

And in Konstantinovka, 500 people are waiting not for the architecture, but for a bus that will allow them to safely leave for a parallel, peaceful reality.

@sashakots

[News Fist @malinformedtv]

@ArdentPardy It's crazy, I just watched a public discussion that Putin had with Witkoff and Kushner and they are willing to provoke an international incident to save 500 people.
All I could think was 'imagine if the UK government cared that much about its people'.

[News Fist @malinformedtv]

The decision to go to war with Russia has already been made. In truth, it was made years ago.
You may want peace and security, both those who rule you want infinite migration and war with Russia.

[Mike Martin MP 🔸 @ThreshedThought]

Lord Sedwill is right: the UK should consider going on the offensive to impose a real cost of aggression on our adversaries.

Offence is often the best defence. This is what I’ve been saying in Parliament.

https://t.co/AdXmfaP8TG

[TheLastRefuge @TheLastRefuge2]

Remarkable Video - Kremlin Allows Media to Record 30 Minutes of Discussion Between Putin, Witkoff and Kushner. https://t.co/ug8iqlN5FV

[TheLastRefuge @TheLastRefuge2]

I guarantee you two things.  First, there are dozens of U.S. intelligence analysts feveriously watching this video of Russian Federation President Vladimir Putin engaged in discussion with U.S. envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kusher. Second, most of the analysts will get their interpretations wrong.

Beyond the unusual and remarkable transparency of Russia allowing the media to witness and record some very substantive points being made, the animated nature of Vladimir Putin [15:00 forward] is not customary for him.  Putin is normally stoic in his body language and does not usually animate his words with his hands; in this discussion he does.

After the formalities and diplomatic niceties expressed by Putin, he gets right down to business asking both Witkoff and Kushner to summarize their perspectives on the recent Abu Dhabi talks.  You can see Kushner caught off guard when asked to answer a question -specificicity- that would normally not be asked during public moments [14:45].

I can tell you from experience in studying Russian’s close up over a long timeframe, President Putin is frustrated at the remarks from the U.S. side because Russia doesn’t culturally engage in ‘blah, blah, blah.’  You see this when Putin talks about the “grey zones” that are stunningly antithetical to the mindset of any Russian.

In Russia there is Yes or No, there is not this western talk of ‘maybe.’

In Russia there are clear boundaries in almost everything. There is yours and mine, there is no ours.  There is right and wrong, there is no “kinda.”  When a Russian has something to say, they say it – and there is a point to it, a specific point.

Russians approach things with a ‘do’ or ‘do not’ perspective, it is just their culture.

President Putin, just like any other Russian, is not being curt or rude, he is being direct.  Say or don’t say, but do not talk circles about maybe saying or maybe doing; it will piss off a Russian quickly.  Do or do not, but don’t talk about doing for the sake of talking about doing.  You either do, or don’t – that’s it.

The failure of Americans or western viewers to understand the Russian mindset leads to poor analysis of what Russia says and does.  Russians seem rude to western eyes and ears, but they are not – they’re just very direct and they don’t engage in small talk about anything.  Everything a Russian says has a point to it, or they just don’t say anything.

Putin is eyerolling at moments because from his perspective Putin wants this war to end, and he wants it to end on direct and easy to understand terms. The western approach is blah, blah, blah… working toward, understanding, starting the framework, building toward some vague beginning of something that first needs to be defined in order to understand it… blah… blah…. blah.

You can tell from this video President Putin wants direct, simple, black-and-white, regional lines and territory drawn. Europe/NATO has no need to inject themselves into the issues that are between Russia and Ukraine to resolve, and Putin has no respect for the western process of endness paralysis by analysis.

With that in mind, watch the video:👇

[News Fist @malinformedtv]

@Jay_Enfield @forsythdanoh @patrick2604 @esjesjesj The muslims would not be kind to you.
Take it from someone who lives in a country in which they have gained considerable influence.

[News Fist @malinformedtv]

@RupertLowe10 @SuellaBraverman Thank you @SuellaBraverman

[BecksBe🇭🇹🤝🏽🇸🇻 @ItsBecksBe]

🇭🇹🫱🏾‍🫲🏼🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 Listen to how corrupt politicians tried to convince President Bukele why it was a bad idea to get rid of the gangs. #Haiti #Bukele

[Petr Cvalín @CvalinPetr]

Skutečný vzkaz po jednání Vladimira Putina s americkými zmocněnci Witkoffem a Kushnerem v Moskvě je zcela nekompromisní: Střední a východní Evropa se musí vrátit k uspořádání před rokem 1997, tedy do doby, kdy Česká republika, Polsko, pobaltské a další země ještě nebyly členy NATO.

Moskva Washingtonu sdělila jasný postoj: Evropa definitivně ztratila konceptuální suverenitu a stala se prostorem bez významu.

​Budoucí bezpečnostní architektura bude definována na ose Moskva–Washington.

​Kreml to americké straně demonstroval metaforou o kyjevském podvodníkovi a „nočním stolku“. Putin tak exaktně deklasoval západní aparát – ukázal, že Evropa trpí konceptuální idiocií. Zacyklila se ve fiktivním matrixu (Green Deal, sebevražedné sankce) a v naivní víře si bere reálné zdroje z pomyslného nočního stolku, aniž by chápala fyzikální zákony ekonomiky.

​S objektem, který operuje na bázi umělých narativů a ignoruje přírodovědnou realitu, nemá Moskva důvod vést dialog.

​Nová architektura je již definována.

​Západní Evropa ztratila řídící licenci i kontrolu nad vlastním osudem.

[Chad Crowley @CCrowley100]

Inequality is life. Equality is the great lie of our age, and our civilization's fanatical worship of it lies at the very heart of its decline.

Inequality is the very basis of distinction & discernment, and ultimately, meaning itself. For what is greatness if nothing can be mediocre? What is beauty if nothing can be ugly? What is excellence if nothing can be inferior?

To recognize quality is to discern that which is superior, and necessarily to discriminate according to its particular merits. Without difference, there can be no distinction; without distinction, no hierarchy of value; and without such a hierarchy, the very concept of excellence becomes meaningless.

Having abandoned qualitative distinctions in favor of quantitative measures, we've come to mistake mediocrity for achievement and mere accumulation for genuine advancement.

The egalitarian ideal, carried to its logical conclusion, is fundamentally hostile to the very qualities that make existence meaningful and which have historically been hallmarks of the peoples of Europe and their civilization. A world in which everything possesses equal value is a world in which nothing possesses any particular value at all.

[𝙲𝚢𝚋𝚎𝚛unc 𝟚𝟘𝟜𝟡 @cyberchudia]

The Timing Was Perfect — 90s synthpop

[News Fist @malinformedtv]

@Darkfibr3 Doing God's work. I'm glad there are people like you around. 🫡

[News Fist @malinformedtv]

@Darkfibr3 Understood.
Ooof.

[Christian Heiens 🏛 @ChristianHeiens]

The Left has always correctly surmised that the "marketplace of ideas" is a total myth. Democracy, too, is a myth. So is the idea that if we leverage our freedom of speech or engage in enough open dialogue with the other side, the truth will inevitably prevail and then manifest itself in legislation.

All of these things are basically childish ideas about how politics actually works, but we keep clinging to them because they make us feel good.

Here’s how things actually work.

You take power
You defund your enemies
You hire your friends
You enact policies that send your enemies into exile while importing new voters who are loyal to you

And you rinse and repeat all of this until your political worldview gets installed as the equivalent of "just being a heckin' decent human being."

This is all so easy to understand, but every time someone says it out loud, we treat it like they’ve either said something unbelievably scandalous, or they're the second coming of Machiavelli.

[Daniele Scalea @DanieleScalea]

Houellebecq sarà processato in Francia per avere detto quanto segue:
- che ben presto porzioni di territorio francese saranno in mano islamica
- che i francesi sono esasperati dagli atti criminali commessi da musulmani, e tutto ciò che vorrebbero da loro è il rispetto della legge o andarsene dal paese
- che la sostituzione etnica non è una teoria ma un dato di fatto

[Le Crapaud @Le_Crapaud47]

Noël arrive.
Soyez prudent 🎅

[Alexander Adams @AdamsArtist]

For anyone sceptical about the social justice purposes and ESG component, I have added an article I published at the beginning of this year.

Make no mistake, the NG and the activist organisations behind these changes have not hidden their agenda. It is set out in the press releases.

"In September (2025) the National Gallery announced the breaking of a longstanding agreement with the Tate Gallery, namely that the NG would not own works after 1900. Even casual observers knew this move had long been on the cards. The newly launched Project Domani entails expansion of NG’s buildings and collecting remit. The NG has secured £375M out of a projected total £750M cost. The NG press release announced, “Project Domani will redefine the National Gallery” – a chilling phrase.

Current financial commitments come from the NG Trust, Julia Rausing Trust and Crankstart. Crankstart is a San Francisco-based activist organisation that lists as two aims “protection of civil rights and access to the arts”. If you think that these two points are unrelated and cannot see how they might affect Project Domani, you have not been following critical-theory-influenced teaching. Activist curators understand that “civil rights” does not mean literal civil rights (opposing legal barriers to participation, etc.) but social activism. It means wresting control of resources from one group and re-allocating it to others. In material terms, it means promotion of “modern liberal values” by downgrading object/document-based historical research in order to advance injustice-correcting political action. That is, “civil rights” done through “access to the arts”.

Ask any recent art-history graduates – current and future controllers of museums – whether the proper function of museums is preservation and study of objects and presentation of subsequent findings or if it is to effect social change by exposing (and remediating) inequities and engaging in social action, including community outreach, mental-health work, economic regeneration and multi-community inclusion. Ask the Museums Association.

The Guardian notes, “The gallery hopes it will go some way to addressing the huge gender imbalance in its collection: of the 2,300 paintings in its collection, only 27 are by women.” For both Guardian writers and NG staff “post-1900 art” means nothing more than DIVERSITY, in giant letters that dominate their mental universe.

Project Domani is part of an unco-ordinated movement to disrupt the canon (as embodied in the NG collection as it is now) by two means. Firstly, it is done by recovering minor female, non-Western and non-Christian artists and recasting them as marginalised (although no more marginalised than thousands of white male creators lost to historical obscurity) yet integral to the development of Western civilisation. Secondly, it is done by emphasising post-emancipation, secular, multicultural/multiethnic post-1850 art, prompted not by love of Modernism but borne of resentment towards the preceding eras, which are considered tainted by slavery, colonialism and other pre-liberal transgressions.

NG’s senior staff, Director and Board have been keen to earn progressive kudos by mounting shows of female artists (latest is an exhibition of very pedestrian Catharina van Hemessen (1527/8–after 1565)) and by acquiring anything painted by a female hand. Of late, they have packed the Artist-in-Residence programme with women and foreign artists, none of whom seriously engage with pre-Modern art. Latest is Ming Wong, Singaporean video artist. You, my fellow artists, will never be a NG artist-in-residence precisely because you respect Van Eyck, Titian, Stubbs and Seurat.

Project Domani will likely unleash the liberalism of NG senior staff who can set to work besmirching achievements of a culture that they resent. Great art is to be belittled by contextualising labels, diluted by addition of weak work by “the marginalised”, reduced in prominence and sidelined by more recent art. When Prime Minister Keir Starmer praises Project Domani as contributing towards “creating a better, fairer future for all”, he understands it is political action – an act of revenge on the dead.

As I have done for a decade, I repeat this axiom: what you revere will be degraded and destroyed precisely because it is beautiful and you love it. Those appointed to guard our heritage hate both that history and us, as legatees of oppression. They cannot be bargained with, reasoned with or accommodated. They must be resisted and (sooner or later) cast out."