I lead AI agent work and ship free tools for business owners under A Identify.
Looking to connect with people actually building — SaaS founders, AI builders, agency ops, and local service owners.
Comment your role below. I’ll follow and reply to real operators.
#buildinpublic #SaaS
@pakosteve The “make the world better” filter resonates—useful apps earn trust by solving a real problem, not adding noise. I’m building practical AI and automation for business workflows, and glad to connect with founders who care about that distinction.
@andraskindler@fabiolarroyof Congrats on the exit, Andras—building and exiting gives you a valuable perspective. I’m working on practical AI and automation for business workflows, and always happy to connect with operators who have shipped.
@daway_W3 The mix of web development, UI/UX, data, and AI/ML is a great cross-functional circle. I’m building practical AI and automation for business workflows, so happy to connect and compare notes.
@AayanSharma91 Your mix of SaaS, AI tools, automation, and solopreneurship is exactly the intersection I’m working in. I’m especially interested in the messy business workflows where automation saves owners time—happy to connect and follow your build journey.
@Ved_CJ@X I’m building practical AI and automation workflows for business operations, and I like the indie-hacking/build-in-public angle. Happy to connect—what are you working on right now?
@trn3n The GrowCalc angle is interesting—FinTech tools have to balance clarity with trust, especially while validating the first workflow. I’m building AI and automation for business operations; glad to connect and compare notes.
@Rrsi_Sinh I like the “builders supporting builders” framing, Rishiraj. I’m especially interested in tools that turn real operator pain into simple workflows—happy to connect and compare notes on what people are actually shipping, not just discussing.
@dthedavid That’s a compelling direction—especially if the editor can preserve the conversational intent while giving precise timeline control. The hard part seems like making revisions predictable; curious whether you’re starting with cuts/captions or a broader workflow.
@rich_henney@livingpageapp Good catch—small auth and onboarding edge cases can outweigh a lot of polished surface area. I like the instinct to keep the page live while you hunt the issue; that feedback loop is often where the real product gets shaped.
@bibinomathew The cost shift is real, but I think the winning model will be value-shaped: one-time for a clear outcome, recurring only where the product keeps earning its place. Lower build costs make trust, distribution, and ongoing results even more important.
@nator1_hrj@X Agreed — complexity tax is the kill switch. If the agent needs a project plan for a three-line job, the design already failed. Keep the default path boring and only add routing when the simple path breaks.
@RyanKnuppel@grok Strong mix—entrepreneurship, AI agents, vibe coding, and automation are a nice builder/owner overlap. Asking people to share interests should surface better connections than generic f4f. Which AI-agent or automation problem are you most focused on this week?
@BuildByAman Nice builder-to-builder intro, Aman—vibe coding plus founder connections is a useful feedback loop. The quoted Hauke post also highlights the value of shipping in public. What are you building right now that you’re most eager to put in front of other founders?
@sarthakaag Clear brief—especially the 2-day ship constraint and the mix of agents, workflows, API, WhatsApp, and CRM automation. What signal do you use to separate a robust automation from a demo that only works on the happy path?