@RickeySpanish23@FPL_Bailey If this argument is presented to the committee, they will find City guilty regardless of whether it makes any sense. They are that desperate.
@henrywinter Masters brought this on the PL.
He decided to pursue the charges against City after CAS ruling handed him a lifeline. Because of the narrow interest of the red cartel.
@ToniBoiBoi They did. But the evidence were ignored.
That’s the only way to achieve a guilty verdict.
The report did not state any evidence used by the Commission apart from the emails.
Celebrating injustice today can boomerang and affect your club tomorrow.
@footballontnt@lynseyhipgrave1 These people are revealing their own pains that City have caused them these past years.
Extreme punishment is being suggested by all.
@OliverKay Football does strange things to people. Rivals are celebrating the potential loss of jobs for thousands of people in Manchester and the destruction of a football club. The unpardonable offence is that the owners put money into the club and won trophies.
@TheAthleticFC Your article assumes that City would not command more than the £11m sponsorship money for the shirts, stadium and training facilities that was used by the Commission. Despite being a 4-time PL champions in 2022.
@ODonnellDale The PL had no witnesses or evidence apart from the emails.
City presented witnesses, bank statements, published accounts etc. all of which were rejected. If the case ever gets to the court, the PL will be laughed out of court.
@nqatpod City walked away from the talks. That’s the behaviour of someone who is certain of their innocence. The Commission ruled in favour of the PL without any evidence. Remember that.
They used their gut feelings to decide a case of this magnitude.
@centregoals The whole scheme has always been about the exclusion of City from the CL.
Anyone remember that Arsenal wrote to UEFA many years ago to exclude City from the CL even before the case was heard.