@REVOcommunities The reason it matters: a like-for-like run would turn this from “looks competitive” into a hard result and a hard result at 0% GPU is a far bigger story than 0.21 vs 0.22 ever was.
@REVOcommunities Genuinely interested in the methodology here: Chat and Claude are marked “approx” but Grok isn’t, where do those numbers come from, and why the difference? Same test set, same number of attempts as the Neuraxon run? Would love to see the comparison on identical conditions. 1/2
▫️ Founder built NXT (first PoS) & co-founded $IOTA
▫️ Papers accepted at ALIFE & AGI-26
▫️ Mining power trains AI, not wasted hashes
▫️ Halving in August, fiat ramp incoming
AGI by 2027? Doesn’t need to happen.
The market just needs to believe.
DYOR. @_Qubic_#Qubic#AGI
So the real questions for the community:
→ Which metric is it?
→ Out-of-sample or backtest?
→ Where’s the public track record?
Strong projects survive strong questions. That’s why I ask them.
$QUBIC @_Qubic_#Qubic#Bitcoin
Everyone’s posting “Anna predicts $BTC 1h ahead with 98% accuracy.”
I’m long $QUBIC. And precisely because I am, let’s define what 98% actually means. 🧵👇
@Lovrincrypto It could be bad for a possible cash out later, using s No-KYC Exchange, keep that in mind. Banks and other Exchanges monitor your deposits. And a No-KYC Exchange is a red Flag.
Nevertheless its chill to use, agreed