@tanngdinh @2ez4rikki @jonayLS@CapitanBarquita Manteneros losers. En 2024 nos vemos. Guarden tuit :). Para el cielo del money sólo hay dos plazas y ya están ocupadas por Jonay y un servidor.
@sacredmateria Dejar elegir a la gente es lo mejor. Bastantes elitismos tenemos en muchos aspectos de la vida como para encima en una de nuestras pocas "vías de escape" meternos en cómo decide cada uno disfrutar el juego.
Imagine you spent 40 years doing the boring, responsible thing.
You opened a 401k at 23. You contributed every paycheck. You ignored the noise. You bought the index because Bogle told you to, because Buffett told you to, because every honest piece of financial advice for 30 years told you the index was the safest, most diversified, most rules-based way to own America.
The whole point was the rules.
The rules said: a company must trade for 12 months before joining the S&P 500. The rules said: it must show four consecutive quarters of GAAP profitability. The rules existed because in 1999 the index quietly bought a lot of stocks at the top, and pensioners paid the bill.
After the dot-com crash, S&P tightened the rules. Nasdaq tightened the rules. FTSE Russell tightened the rules.
For 23 years, those rules held.
Then SpaceX filed for IPO.
And the rules changed.
The S&P 500 waived the profitability requirement. Nasdaq cut its trading-history window from 90 days to 15. FTSE Russell cut its to 5.
Bloomberg Intelligence estimates the major index funds will absorb between 19% and 24% of SpaceX's float within six months. That's over $30 trillion of passive 401k and retirement money, mechanically buying a single newly public company at IPO valuations, because the rules said they had to.
Except the rules used to say they didn't.
Here's the thought exercise:
If you spend 40 years building a system designed to protect ordinary savers from buying overpriced stocks, and then you waive the protections the moment a sufficiently large stock asks you to, what was the system actually protecting?
Most of investing is about understanding what's a rule and what's a guideline.
A rule binds the rule-maker.
A guideline binds the saver.
You're allowed to find out which is which only after the fact.
Efectivamente, los cargos públicos de VOX son casi todls godos después de la limpia que tuvieron que hacer cuando su propia militancia les pidió explicaciones por el dinero recaudado supuestamente para La Palma
Urge una ley que inhabilite de por vida a periodistas que difundan información falsa. La impunidad de alimañas como Inda, Ferreras, Nacho Abad o Pedro Jeta es un insulto a la inteligencia
Si un rentista puede poner un alquiler a 1.500€ sin terminar ajusticiado en la plaza es simplemente porque las relaciones de poder están muy en contra de la clase trabajadora.
El Estado, los medios de comunicación y el capital de los empresarios actúan para hacerlo posible.
People really need to stop hating on China man. Every time I’m in a pickle it’s China saving me.
Gas prices too high? I’m riding in the BYD. DRAM costs an arm and a leg? CXMT floods the market. Anthropic and OpenAI fucking me on token costs? Hello my friend Mr. Qwen.
The CCP has done more for my cost of living than my own government.
@comuflauta Hemos llegado a un punto super absurdo. Cualquier producto mínimamente limitado, aunque sea una puta lampara de IKEA, se vuelve en seguida carne de especulación. Los especuladores se arrastran lo que haga falta por dos duros.
Ya no puedes comprar una colección ni nada que te guste distinto de forma tranquila porque tienes tryhards hasta con los regalos del Nesquik.
Estáis aumentando el hiperconsumismo por encima de vuestras posibilidades.