Maree Page

[Maree Page @maree_page]

Australia's ABC only broadcasts Iran's Islamic regime supporters. It's as if the slaughter of 40k Iranian citizens never happened!

[Dr. Maalouf ‏ @realMaalouf]

For those suffering from amnesia: just four months ago, the Islamic regime in Iran slaughtered over 40,000 people in only two days, for the sole ‘crime’ of protesting for freedom.

[SueG96 🧡🇦🇺 @SuzieWm5mbxyrwp]

This is exacrly why ON keep rising in the polls ! She is exactly what this country needs

[Dr. Maalouf ‏ @realMaalouf]

Remember, all Muslim countries in the Middle East were once Christian.

When the Muslim invaders arrived, they killed the men, raped the women, enslaved the children.

That’s how those countries became Islamic. And that’s exactly what they’re trying to do in the UK and Europe now.

[Peter cgm 🇫🇷🇺🇦🇮🇱🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🦁☀️ @pkcgm]

At one point, in the year 732,
80% of Christian countries were conquered by islam, only three left - France, papal Italy, Byzance. if France had lost the war against islam, there would never be Western civilisation.

Imagine that… one battle which shaped the world…

One batte, Tours… if we had lost to islam there would be no Mozart, Bach, Beethoven, no Michelangelo, da Vinci, no Sistine chapel, no Pieta in Vatican, no St Peter, no Athens, no London, no Prado, no Louvre… no human rights, no women rights, women second class citizens, no democracy, no Magna Charts… we would live like in Afghanistan….

we would be another islamic shit hole…

[Maree Page @maree_page]

@Be_like_legend @hempyhope I feel that hoarders also suffer from this affliction. The hoarded items hold memories. Perhaps hoarding is a symptom of ADHD? I've known a couple of hoarders & they're highly intelligent & seem to have a photographic memory when it comes to their stuff.

[Maree Page @maree_page]

My resistance/refusal to the narrative began 25yrs ago. My son was vaccinated with MMR, but acquired mumps soon afterwards. The gaslighting from the Dr was disturbing. He basically insisted that he must have been around other children (he hadn't) and then said the words that were oft repeated during the COVID academic. " It would have been a lot worse if he wasn't vaccinated."
This is an unquantifiable statement. I never gave my kids another Vax, and never trusted the Vax industry again. It's all about money, and any voice of discent is shouted down with gaslighting and abuse. Safe and effective? Nope. Not without years of clinical trials and studies.

[Kenny Carmody @KennyCarmody]

The Psychology of the Resisters: What the Obedience Experiments Never Told Us

Every crisis reveals something about human nature. The pandemic revealed something most of us were not prepared to see, about compliance, about conscience, and about the small minority who refused.

Every obedience experiment in history had the same overlooked finding.
Not everyone complied.

In Milgram’s laboratory at Yale in 1961, 65 percent of participants delivered what they believed were potentially lethal electric shocks to a stranger, simply because a man in a white coat told them to. The world remembered that number. It became the defining fact of the experiment. The evidence of how easily ordinary people could be led to do terrible things.

But 35 percent refused.

In Solomon Asch’s conformity experiments, 75 percent of participants denied obvious visual evidence at least once to match a unanimous wrong group. That number too became the headline. The proof of social pressure’s power.

But 25 percent never conformed. Not once, across any trial.

In Philip Zimbardo’s Stanford Prison Experiment, the guards became cruel within days and the prisoners psychologically broke. That became the story ,the terrifying demonstration of how quickly roles override character.
But at least one guard refused to dehumanize. And one prisoner did something even more remarkable: he demanded a lawyer instead of a doctor, breaking the psychological frame of the entire experiment by insisting on his identity outside the role the situation had assigned him.

We spent decades studying the ones who complied.

We wrote the textbooks about them. We built the psychology curricula around them. We used their compliance as the lens through which we understood human nature under pressure.

We barely asked what made the others different.

That question matters more now than it ever has.

[Maree Page @maree_page]

In a nutshell...

[Matt Goodwin @GoodwinMJ]

It’s not social media that’s “inflaming tensions”.

It’s not Elon Musk.
It’s not Nigel Farage.
It’s not the ‘far-right’.

It is the very deliberate policy of mass uncontrolled immigration & open borders.

This policy has to end or it will destroy Western nations.

[Maree Page @maree_page]

@magataotao Pauline certainly wiped that smarmy 'mean girl' smile off the reporter's face pretty quickly. She really got her silly ass handed back to her 😆

[Mr. Pool @MrPool_QQ]

🔻 SPERM COUNTS HAVE DROPPED 62% SINCE 1973. TESTOSTERONE IS FALLING 1% EVERY YEAR. BY 2045, THE MEDIAN MAN WILL BE INFERTILE. THIS IS NOT A PREDICTION. IT IS A PUBLISHED TRAJECTORY — AND NOBODY IS TRYING TO STOP IT.

A 30-year-old man today has the testosterone of a 60-year-old in 1987. Not because he's unhealthy. Because something in his environment is chemically castrating him — slowly, invisibly, since before he was born.

In 2017, a meta-analysis of 185 studies — 42,935 men across 6 continents — confirmed: sperm concentration dropped 52% between 1973 and 2011. A 2023 update extended the data: the decline is accelerating. Not slowing. Getting worse.

Dr. Shanna Swan, reproductive epidemiologist at Mount Sinai, published the projection: at current rates, median sperm count reaches zero by 2045. Half of all men — functionally sterile. She called it "an existential crisis for the human species."

The cause is not a mystery. It has a name: phthalates.

Phthalates are plastic softeners. In food packaging. Shampoo. Cologne. Vinyl flooring. Canned food lining. Car dashboards. Children's toys. They are anti-androgenic — they suppress testosterone at the fetal level. Before a boy is born, phthalates are reducing his reproductive capacity for life.

A former endocrine research scientist — 11 years at a reproductive toxicology lab funded by NIH:

"We identified the mechanism in 2007. Phthalate exposure during weeks 8-14 of gestation permanently reduces Leydig cell function — the cells that produce testosterone for life. The damage is irreversible. It happens before birth. We submitted for regulatory review. Response: 'Insufficient evidence for market restriction.' The same compounds were found in 99% of Americans tested by CDC. Insufficient evidence — in 99% of the population. Reference: RTL-2007-0294. Shelved."

A man in 1970: average testosterone 700 ng/dL. Today: 400 ng/dL. A 43% collapse in one generation.

Your fatigue. Your low drive. Your brain fog. Your inability to build muscle like your father did. Your anxiety from nowhere. Not character flaws. Symptoms of chemical exposure that began in your mother's womb.

They put it in everything you touch. Then sell you testosterone therapy at $200/month. The poison creates the patient. The patient creates the profit.

CODE: LEVINE-2017-185 / SWAN-2045-ZERO / PHTHALATES-99PCT / RTL-2007-0294 / T-700to400

⟁
Your grandfather was not tougher than you. He was not exposed to what you were. They didn't make men weaker. They chemically unmade them — starting in the womb. Share this.

[Maree Page @maree_page]

@FreedomAus80100 That's very satisfying news 😅

[𝐍𝐢𝐨𝐡 𝐁𝐞𝐫𝐠 🇮🇷 ✡︎ @NiohBerg]

Every day I understand this girl more and more.

[Maree Page @maree_page]

Good question.

[For Life and Liberty 1787 @LifeLiberty1787]

@WallStreetMav @IndianConserva5

[Prue MacSween @macsween_prue]

It’s not “just the economy stupid” as delusional, dumb @AlboMP claims about the @AustralianLabor falling poll results. It’s the lies. The spending. The incompetence. The Muslim & union appeasement. The mass migration. The woke ideology brainwashing our kids in schools. It’s the IR imposts on business. The CGT & death taxes, it’s the travel rorts, turning a blind eye to the corrupt Aboriginal industry, Bowen’s net zero renewables fantasy, the relegation of our national flag, the spin & juvenile social media antics, the alienation of our strongest ally, the pro-Palestine stance, the grants to woke university activists, the Isis traitors welcome home, the Administrative Review Tribunal… Is that enough to start with?

[Maree Page @maree_page]

We're being conquered. Wake up.

[James Woods @RealJamesWoods]

Despite having hundreds of mosques in New York, mass street “prayers” are becoming a staple of life in the Big Apple.

And it’s not prayers, my friends, but assertion. They are claiming turf, like hyenas pissing to mark territory.

[Maree Page @maree_page]

@realRick_AUS The footage of the home invasion is horrific. The gang showed no mercy to the 61 yr old man. They brutally stabbed him with a short blade numerous times, whilst he was telling them to take whatever they wanted. Savages.

[Kenny Carmody @KennyCarmody]

Stanley Milgram ran his experiments in the early 1960s because he wanted to understand how ordinary German citizens had participated in the Holocaust.

How ordinary people, not monsters, not people with unusual psychological profiles, had done what they had done.

What he found was not a German answer. It was a human one. That ordinary people, under conditions of sufficient institutional authority and sufficient diffusion of personal responsibility, would administer what they believed to be severe electric shocks to screaming strangers at the instruction of a man in a white coat. Not all of them. But most of them. Far more than anyone predicted before the experiments ran.

The Western response to COVID is Milgram at civilisational scale.
The authority was total.

The fear was carefully maintained at levels sufficient to suppress independent judgment. The social environment made compliance feel like virtue and resistance feel like selfishness. The responsibility for outcomes was diffused through a chain of institutional instruction long enough that no individual had to feel the full weight of what they were participating in.
And people left their dying alone.

That is the finding. Not a secondary finding. Not a contextual detail. The central finding.

The thing that tells you more about what happened psychologically during COVID than any policy analysis or institutional accountability framework can tell you.

The dying did not need the science to be different. They needed the people who loved them to be in the room. The people who loved them had the capacity to be in the room. The institutional construction of fear and authority and social pressure was sufficient to prevent them from being there.

Milgram showed that ordinary people would harm strangers under institutional pressure. COVID showed that ordinary people would abandon their dying family members under it.
These are not the same finding. The second is worse.

And we are not examining it. Not in our public discourse. Not in our institutions. Not in the reckoning with what the pandemic period produced in us that we are pretending to conduct while actually conducting a different, more comfortable inquiry into institutional failures of policy rather than the human failure that the policy failure enabled and that we participated in.

The reckoning that is actually required is the one that asks what we became.

What was revealed in us. What the construction of sufficient fear and sufficient authority produced in people who in other conditions would have said: there is nothing that would keep me from that room.

The answer is not comfortable. It is not exculpatory.

It is the most important piece of evidence we have about what COVID actually was.

And we have not yet looked at it directly.

[Maree Page @maree_page]

If you continue to be jabbed, it's only a matter of time before the switch is flicked. That's why they're still hammering the airwaves to convince the over 65's to get vaccinated. They want you dead, so they don't have to pay your pension and can obtain your property to house young migrants.

[Valerie Anne Smith @ValerieAnne1970]

🚨GRAPHENE IS ALIVE — AND IT’S LISTENING

This isn’t a static particle.
It’s moving. Twisting. Reacting on command to external frequencies — like it’s programmed.

Graphene oxide, found in the shots millions took, behaves like a living antenna inside the body.

One signal and it reorganizes.

What happens when they broadcast the right frequency?

Your blood. Your brain. Your future.

They didn’t just inject you.
They installed hardware.

This is no longer theory.
Your body might already be waiting for orders.

[Maree Page @maree_page]

Do not comply.

[Kenny Carmody @KennyCarmody]

Every obedience experiment in history had the same overlooked finding.

Not everyone complied.

In Milgram’s lab, 35% refused to deliver the final shock. In Asch’s line experiments, 25% never conformed, not once, across any trial. In Zimbardo’s prison, at least one guard refused to dehumanize. One prisoner demanded a lawyer instead of a doctor and broke the psychological frame entirely.

We spent decades studying the ones who obeyed.

We barely asked what made the others different.

That question matters more now than it ever has.

The resisters in the COVID era were not difficult to find. Physicians who filed exemptions and lost their licenses. Nurses who walked away from careers rather than mandate patients into decisions they hadn’t genuinely chosen. Scientists who published contrary data knowing what it would cost them. Parents who stood alone at school board meetings. Ordinary people who simply said, quietly, without drama , no.

What made them different?

Research consistently identifies a cluster of factors. Not personality traits you either have or don’t. Situational and cognitive patterns that can be cultivated.

First: prior reflection on authority. The resisters had usually thought, before the crisis, about the limits of institutional trust. They weren’t cynics. They were people who had already asked the question “under what conditions would I refuse?” before anyone was asking them to comply.

Second: a concrete reference point outside the consensus. A value, a principle, an oath, a relationship that existed independently of the institutional structure demanding compliance. Something the system couldn’t reach.

Third: at least one other person. Milgram found that a single dissenting confederate reduced compliance dramatically. The resisters rarely stood entirely alone. They found each other. Sustained each other. Gave each other permission.

Fourth: the willingness to tolerate social pain. Not immunity to it. Tolerance of it. They felt the pressure. They felt the exclusion. They chose the discomfort of integrity over the comfort of belonging.
None of this is innate. All of it is learnable.

The most important thing Milgram, Asch, and Zimbardo taught us is not how fragile conscience is.

It’s that conscience can hold, if you’ve trained it, named its limits, and found even one other person willing to hold theirs beside you.

Build that now. Because the experiment is always running.

Until then stay humble.

[facts about @destinationXIX]

There is one part of Islamist terrorism that the West still refuses to look at directly: sexual violence.

Not as chaos. Not as “war is ugly.” Not as an unfortunate byproduct.

As a method.

The newly released report "Silenced No More: Sexual Terror Unveiled", published on May 12, 2026 by the Civil Commission on October 7 Crimes by Hamas Against Women and Children, documents what many tried very hard not to see: sexual violence on October 7 was not an isolated rumor, not one battlefield story, and not a single location. It appeared across multiple sites: the Nova festival, roads, kibbutzim, military bases, and captivity in Gaza.

The report describes rape, gang rape, forced nudity, mutilation, sexualized torture, humiliation, and sexual abuse of hostages. It is based on hundreds of testimonies, thousands of media files, and expert review. And it sits alongside the UN Special Representative’s finding that there are reasonable grounds to believe conflict-related sexual violence, including rape and gang rape, occurred during the October 7 attacks, and clear and convincing information that hostages were subjected to sexual violence in captivity.

This matters because October 7 was not just a massacre. It was a message.

Hamas did not only murder Israelis. It attacked the family unit. It attacked women in front of men, children in front of parents, parents in front of children, bodies in front of communities. This is kinocide: not only killing people, but destroying the sacred bonds that make people human. Sexual violence in that context is not only an assault on the individual victim. It is a weapon against the family, the tribe, the nation, and the future.

And Hamas did not invent this.

ISIS used sexual slavery against Yazidi women and girls as part of its genocidal project. Women were categorized, sold, raped, transferred, and treated as spoils of religious war. Boko Haram, al-Shabaab, the Taliban, and other jihadist movements have used abduction, forced marriage, sexual slavery, and rape as tools of terror and control. In the West, too, we have seen what happens when institutions refuse to confront patterns of organized sexual exploitation because they are afraid of the political consequences. In Britain, working-class girls were raped and trafficked while officials often looked away, worried that naming the problem would be called racism.

Institutional cowardice pretending to be humanitarian.

This pattern is older than October 7. In the 1929 Hebron massacre, long before “occupation” could be used as an excuse, Jews were butchered in their ancient community by mobs incited through religious hysteria and lies. The testimonies from that pogrom include mutilation, rape, gang rape, family slaughter, and the same basic logic: terrorize Jews not only by killing them, but by desecrating the intimate spaces of home, body, family, and memory.

That is why the silence after October 7 was so obscene.

Instead of facing what happened, too many people rushed to minimize it. Deny it. “Contextualize” it. Or worse, invert it by trying to shift the accusation onto Israel as though the documented sexual violence of Hamas could be erased by propaganda against the Jewish state.

This is one of the ways Jew-hatred destroys the host system.

When the victims are Jews, the crime is suddenly treated as complicated. Feminists who advocated to "believe all women" become forensic skeptics. Human-rights activists become defense attorneys for rapists. Women’s organizations discover endless nuance. Journalists demand impossible evidence from burned bodies, dead victims, traumatized survivors, and hostages still in tunnels.

But the victims were not only Jews. There were foreign workers, festivalgoers, tourists, women, men, children, elderly people, and hostages from multiple nationalities. The moral test was not “do you like Israel?” The moral test was: can you condemn rape as a weapon of terror when the rapists are on your preferred political side?

Many failed.

@GadSaad wrote that an Islamist had told him, in Arabic, “The West is a woman to be mounted”. Crude as it sounds, it captures something Western elites refuse to understand: extremists often read Western compassion, guilt, feminism, openness, and legal restraint not as virtues to be reciprocated, but as vulnerabilities to be exploited.

And look honestly at the worldview. Under Islamist rule, women do not become freer. They become covered, controlled, segregated, beaten, married off, silenced, punished for dishonor, and treated as vessels of family reputation. In parts of the region, “marry your rapist” laws and customs have allowed attackers to escape justice by marrying the victim. In Gaza, legal and social structures under Hamas have not produced a women’s-rights paradise. They have produced a society where women live under patriarchal religious rule, and where armed men build tunnels for fighters, not shelters for civilians.

So where are the women’s organizations?
Where were the campus feminists?
Where were the international NGOs that can produce a statement in twenty minutes when the villain fits their ideology?

Too many of them abandoned their reason d'etre. They were not silent because the evidence was absent. They were silent because the victims were politically inconvenient and the perpetrators sat inside the “resistance” category of their worldview.

The West is already watching women’s rights erode from multiple directions: extreme gender ideology that erases female spaces and sports, and Islamist politics that treats women’s bodies as battlegrounds for honor, conquest, shame, and submission. These are different movements, but they meet at one ugly point: women are told to be quiet for the sake of someone else’s ideology.

No.
This is where the line has to be drawn.

Sexual violence is not resistance. Rape is not decolonization. Gang rape is not liberation. Sexual torture is not “context". Forced marriage is not culture. Honor killing is not family values. And women’s bodies are not battlefields for men who want power, whether they speak in the language of religion, revolution, or social justice.

If the West cannot defend women when the perpetrators are Islamists, then its feminism is dead.

If human-rights organizations cannot defend Jewish women, Yazidi women, British girls, Iranian women, Afghan women, Israeli women, and Palestinian women from the same underlying contempt, then they are not human-rights organizations. They are political machines with a logo.

The lesson of October 7 is not only about Israel.

It is a warning.

When sexual terror is excused because it serves the “right” cause, it does not stay contained. It spreads. It is copied. It is normalized. And eventually the societies that refused to name it discover that the monster they excused abroad has learned to speak their language at home.

Believe the victims.
Name the ideology.
Draw the line.
https://t.co/g77B492ZOX