Science journalism should use the vaccine test when communicating about nuclear power or any other science subject. Ask your self "would I give the same legitimacy to non-expert views on vaccines?" The same goes for expert views that are a minority and at odds with consensus.
The current wind lull in Europe is a big reality check for the renewables-only crowd. The reality is that no storage tech is remotely close to being able to run a whole continent for 2 weeks with low sun and no wind. If nuclear's out of the picture, only fossil fuels remain.
the science is clear: nuclear energy is safe and countries that use nuclear have consistently lower emissions than those that do not. it’s time we listen to scientists, not the fossil fuel industry.
“The IPCC report also should prompt environmental campaigners to abandon some traditional prejudices, particularly against nuclear power.” @FT https://t.co/klCmtXxzfK
Reminder that 2 of these 6 plants are scheduled to be shut down decades prematurely *this year*
We cannot afford to take our most reliable and resilient source of clean electricity for granted
Achieving 2050 net zero in the US entirely with renewables "will require around 590,000 sq km (or 227,800 sq miles) of America to be blanketed in turbines and panels, around a tenth of all the land in the contiguous US," reports @guardian
https://t.co/3GztEc28Hq
The Magnitsky Act should be applied to Putin and his regime for the false arrest of @navalny. See my interview with @euronews https://t.co/fReIjODZUB
This debate either has to be moderated or microphones have to be turned off so the president cannot keep interrupting and talking over VP Biden. The American people deserve better.
This election season, I’m supporting the always-on energy source that employs 475,000 Americans and contributes $60 billion annually to our country’s GDP. Learn more about the benefits of #nuclear energy: https://t.co/jXStVhwG0v #NM4A2020#PresidentialDebates