¿Conocen un ejemplo mayor de mala fe intelectual que el de @alfonsopratgay?
El presidente @JMilei está teniendo éxito en una batalla muy difícil contra la inflación:
2023: 211%
2024: 117,8%
2025: 32%
2026: 29,8% proyectado
2027: 20% proyectado
A Israel y Japón les llevó seis o siete años dominar procesos inflacionarios persistentes. Milei heredó un Banco Central quebrado, un Tesoro insolvente y una inflación mensual del 25,5%. En apenas dos años y medio corrigió el desequilibrio fiscal, saneó el balance del BCRA y consolidó una trayectoria descendente.
Prat-Gay, cuyo keynesiano contribuyó decisivamente al fracaso económico de Macri, ahora manipula las cifras para afirmar que Milei perdió la batalla contra la inflación.
Si uno está en una escalera, ¿da lo mismo subir que bajar? Para Prat-Gay, aparentemente sí. No importa la trayectoria, el punto de partida ni los desequilibrios heredados. Solo importa elegir el número que le permita sostener su relato.
Son feministas hasta que Bad Bunny les baila pegado.
Son socialistas hasta que descubren lo cómoda que es volar en primera clase.
Son ecologistas hasta que toca un fin de semana en yate o un vuelo a las Maldivas.
Son tolerantes hasta que se enteran de que votas a la derecha.
Son pacifistas hasta que alguien discrepa de ellos.
Son partidarios de la libertad de expresión hasta que escuchan algo que no les gusta.
Son antielitistas hasta que los invitan a un reservado VIP.
Son ciudadanos del mundo hasta que les toca tenerlos de vecino.
Son partidarios de repartir la riqueza hasta que les toca repartir la suya.
The Bergamo convoy. Military trucks moving through a small Italian town in early 2020, the world watching, everyone told those trucks were carrying the coffins of COVID dead. That image is part of why people accepted what came next.
It has only recently been confirmed that each of those trucks held one coffin. It was staged.
A research group of Italian doctors is compiling data showing that countries with the highest vaccination rates are also seeing the highest all-cause mortality rates.
Nurses and medical staff are now openly saying that elderly patients were being classified as COVID regardless of their actual diagnosis, because hospitals received five times the reimbursement for a COVID admission. The people dying were elderly, already carrying multiple conditions, and the act of hospitalizing them was itself part of what killed them. Scientists call that a syndemic. Not a pandemic. The difference matters.
Italy was the image used to frighten the world into compliance. I am still finding out what was actually happening here.
Voy a decir algo que incomoda.
Y no me importa.🤷
La escuela argentina no se cayó sola.
La tiraron abajo con premeditación y alevosía.
Durante veinte años aplicaron un modelo educativo que fue, en los hechos, una demolición cultural sistemática.
Y lo hicieron con una coartada perfecta: los derechos del niño.
Nadie se iba a oponer a eso. Genial. Aplausos.👍
Pero detrás de esa bandera vinieron tres operaciones que destruyeron generaciones enteras:
- Le sacaron la autoridad a los docentes.
El maestro pasó de ser una figura de respeto a ser un empleado maniatado.
No puede exigir, no puede reprobar sin justificarse ante diez formularios, no puede corregir sin que le digan que "violenta".
Lo castraron pedagógicamente y después se preguntan por qué los chicos no aprenden nada.
- Le sacaron la autoridad a los padres.
La escuela se convirtió en el brazo del Estado para hablarle a tus hijos por encima tuyo.
Sin pedirte permiso. Sin escucharte.
Agenda de género, ideología, educación sexual desde la infancia.
El hijo ya no es tuyo.
Es del sistema.😳
Nivelaron para abajo y lo llamaron inclusión.
Sacaron la exigencia.
Sacaron el esfuerzo.
Sacaron la nota que duele y te obliga a crecer.
Todo era trauma, todo era violencia, todo era exclusión.
El resultado está a la vista: chicos que terminan el secundario sin poder escribir una carta ni resolver una cuenta simple.🤌
Y mientras hacían todo eso, ¿saben qué desapareció silenciosamente del aula?🤔
- Los modales.
- El protocolo social.
- El castellano correcto.
- La música.
-El arte.
-La estética.
-La formación del carácter.
Todo aquello que hacía que un pibe de barrio saliera de la escuela sabiendo pararse ante el mundo con dignidad.
Eso era la verdadera movilidad social.
Eso era igualdad de verdad.👍
Lo borraron.
Y lo reemplazaron con adoctrinamiento que no le sirve para conseguir trabajo, criar una familia ni entender la realidad.
Esto no es una crítica a los docentes.
Al contrario.👍
Los docentes son las primeras v��ctimas de este esquema siniestro.
Los que tienen vocación se rompen el alma tratando de enseñar dentro de un sistema diseñado para que no puedan.
La crítica es al modelo.
A la ideología que lo construyó.
A los que lo diseñaron sabiendo exactamente adónde llevaba.
Una generación sin autoridad que la contenga.
Sin belleza que la eleve.
Sin exigencia que la forje.
Eso no es un error.
Eso es una política. 😳🇦🇷
Y los resultados los estamos pagando todos.
👇 ¿O me equivoco?
A very sad announcement.
I have just been convicted a second time for 'hate speech' and it is only due to a technicality that I could not immediately be sent to jail —to the judge's frustration.
In an ironic turn of events it's actually thanks to my previous prison sentence (for memes in a private group chat) that I am now still free —in a physical sense, at least.
Call me naive but I didn't think they would take it this far, given that this precedent criminalises many of the arguments used by even the most moderate politicians critical of mass migration.
In February 2024 I gave a lecture at Catholic University Leuven wherein I linked mass migration to crime and a deterioration of our quality of life. Every single point I made was 100% the truth and based on scientific evidence.
Cynically, even the judge that convicted me admits as much by writing in his verdict: “Even if all of the statements made by Van Langenhove are based on scientific evidence and statistics, it makes no difference to the criminal intent. Van Langenhove is not charged with spreading false information. He is charged with presenting facts in a way that incites hatred against persons on the grounds of one or more of the protected criteria in the Anti-Racism Law.”
That's a lot of words just to say he wants to send me to prison for speaking the truth.
Even the regime media write: "It did not matter to the court that Van Langenhove was quoting scientific sources. The judge argued that Van Langenhove's main message was that a big part of the societal problems like insecurity, housing shortages and lowering educational standards are due to mass migration."
You may think the regime media are being sympathetic to me in the first sentence, but in reality they are warning people: even if you speak the truth, if you go against our narrative, we will crush you in every way possible.
Both the public prosecutor and the judge did not present a single real argument as to how or against whom I would have incited hatred. So even if I would accept their crazy, dystopic law, I still did not break it.
The only argument they present is that I created a "hostile atmosphere of us versus them” in regards to migrants. But even this silly argument (which is not even a punishable offence) is not true. To me, the deadly disease is self-hatred and one of its worst symptoms is replacement migration. My enemy is thus NOT the migrants themselves but those orchestrating the mass migration.
Sadly, in Belgium, evidence is not needed and ‘vibes’ are enough to put someone in jail.
Given the fact that I have another court case coming up in September and that I have a dozen active criminal investigations for hate speech, time is running out for me. I have already paid more than €420,000 in legal fees and there is no ending in sight. I have been in an intense battle of attrition for eight years and must now regroup to make sure I can still win.
If you want to help me, you can do so via the links below. If you can help in other ways, please contact me via DM.
If you live in a country that still has free speech, never let them touch it, however noble they make the motives sound, because this is where it leads to.
I can confirm that Barnes and Noble will not be selling “Dangerous Misinformation” in their stores. If you own an independent bookstore and have the courage to sell it, please let me know - I’d love to give you free advertising.
If you go into hospital as an alcoholic, they don't put a bottle of vodka on your bedside table and titrate the dose.
They remove the alcohol.
If you go into hospital as a heroin addict, they don't hand you a syringe with the meal tray.
They remove the heroin.
If you go into hospital as a smoker, they don't wheel you outside every two hours for a cigarette break.
They remove the cigarettes.
If you go into hospital as a type 2 diabetic, they bring you white toast, cornflakes, fruit juice, a jam sachet, and a sweetened yoghurt.
Then inject insulin to manage the blood sugar response.
Then write in your notes that your diabetes is "poorly controlled."
Every other addiction is treated by removing the substance.
The one driven by carbohydrate is treated by serving the substance and medicating the response.
Have a think about why.
Me da la impresión que con medidas como estas Argentina se está convirtiendo en un experimento del globalismo tecnócrata.
Ante casos como estos es que tenemos que cuestionarnos si a esto se refería @AgustinLaje en su gran obra Batalla Cultural cuando se refiere a nuestros tiempos como "épocas «antipolíticas» o «apolíticas», en las que lo político es reemplazado por la «gobernanza», por la tecnocracia, por la automaticidad de una hegemonía tal que desactiva sostenidamente el conflicto [entre izquierda y derecha]."
Es realmente preocupante que las grandes compañías tecnológicas tendrán acceso en vivo y en directo a todos los datos que se puedan recopilar del pueblo argentino. Es el sueño húmedo de compañías como Google que buscan extender la vigilancia y el control a todos los aspectos de la vida del ser humano.
¿De qué se trata exactamente?
Es un sistema de Inteligencia Artificial que integra datos masivos (de múltiples fuentes públicas y privadas) para crear un "gemelo digital" de la sociedad argentina. El objetivo declarado es simular, predecir y optimizar políticas sociales: anticipar pobreza, impacto de subsidios, desarrollo de capital humano, etc. En teoría, pasa de un Estado reactivo (que da ayudas después del problema) a uno predictivo que "sabe" qué va a pasar.
Suena futurista y eficiente. El problema es que esto es el sueño húmedo de cualquier tecnócrata autoritario, y los riesgos son estructurales.
Los principales peligros:
1. Vigilancia masiva y muerte de la privacidad:
Para que funcione un gemelo digital social se necesita un cruce de datos brutal: ingresos, educación, salud, consumo, comportamiento en redes, historial familiar, etc. Esto crea una base de datos centralizada del ciudadano argentino como nunca antes existió.
Aunque hoy digan "solo para políticas sociales", una vez que el Estado tiene esa capacidad técnica y legal, el abuso futuro es casi inevitable (sea este gobierno o el próximo).
2. Camino hacia un sistema de crédito social (social scoring):
Esto se asemeja peligrosamente a lo que hace China o a las herramientas que vende Palantir (la empresa de Peter Thiel).
El algoritmo decide quién "merece" más o menos ayuda, quién es "riesgo social", quién genera "buen capital humano". Eso no es neutral. Los sesgos algorítmicos son reales y suelen discriminar por clase, zona geográfica, origen o comportamiento.
3. Deshumanización de la política social
La pobreza y los problemas sociales no son solo variables matemáticas. Son realidades humanas complejas. Dejar que una IA "proyecte escenarios" y optimice decisiones implica que el Estado empieza a tratar a las personas como datos en un modelo. Eso reduce la libertad y la dignidad individual.
4. Contradicción libertaria brutal:
Milei se presenta como anarco-capitalista/libertario. Sin embargo, esto es expansión del poder estatal a través de la tecnología más sofisticada. No es achicar el Estado, es hacerlo más inteligente y omnipresente en la vida de la gente.
Un Estado mínimo no necesita un gemelo digital de toda la sociedad. Un Estado que quiere predecir y "optimizar" el comportamiento humano sí lo necesita.
5. Riesgos técnicos y de robo de datos
- En ciberseguridad: un solo hackeo y todos los datos sensibles de los argentinos quedan expuestos.
- Dependencia tecnológica: si está construido con tecnología de Palantir, AWS y otras Big Tech extranjeras, Argentina pierde soberanía sobre sus propios datos.
- Falta de transparencia: los algoritmos son opacos.
¿Quién audita el modelo? ¿Quién corrige los errores?
Usar IA para mejorar la eficiencia en la gestión pública no es malo en sí mismo. Usarla para cruzar datos masivos y modelar la sociedad entera en tiempo real sí lo es, especialmente en un país con instituciones débiles, tradición de abuso estatal y polarización alta.
Esto no es "adelantarse al futuro". Es traer herramientas de control social del futuro al presente, mientras se vende como innovación libertaria. Los que hoy aplauden porque "es Milei" pueden arrepentirse cuando otro gobierno use el mismo sistema para otros fines.
El peligro no es que Milei quiera usarlo mal hoy. El peligro es que está creando la infraestructura técnica y legal para que algún día se pueda usar muy mal. Y la historia muestra que ese tipo de poder casi nunca se deja sin usar.
Espero sinceramente que quienes entienden esto que escribo y están cerca del Presidente frenen esta locura.
When butter was demonised, Unilever sold margarine.
When tallow was demonised, Procter and Gamble sold Crisco.
When eggs were demonised, Kellogg's sold cereal.
When red meat was demonised, Cargill sold soy.
When raw milk was demonised, Nestle sold infant formula.
When leather was demonised, BASF sold PVC.
When wool was demonised, ExxonMobil sold polyester feedstock.
When animal fat was demonised, the seed-oil industry grew from a niche product to the most consumed food ingredient on earth.
Every demonisation of an animal product made a specific group of shareholders very rich.
Every one of those products had been eaten by humans for thousands of years without incident.
The science changed the moment a substitute existed to sell.
Follow the money. The advice will start to make a lot more sense.
So it turns out that HANTAVIRUS is a side effect of the Covid "vaccine", now apart from weakening immunity to the point of being susceptible to many viral infections, it is possible that Hantavirus is actually in the Covid "vaccine" and that is why GAVI predicted the new scamdemic in 2021 when the Covid "vaccine" was rolled out! This would not be unprecedented, other "vaccines" including the "Polio" "vaccine" contained SV40 the cancer causing monkey virus, and sequences of it were found in the Covid "vaccine" as well.
Here are the Spotify and Apple Podcast links to a podcast episode we did last year with Dr. Richard Weller, a dermatologist in the UK who is literally the world expert on this.
He comes on around 16:30.
https://t.co/x9RDPT1Sxc
https://t.co/9ylBBZhkVx
ALS is taking my body. It shouldn't also take my money.
5 months ago @binance's Face ID stopped recognizing me because the disease changed my face. Their response: nothing. No accessible alternative for users with disabilities.
This is what happens when a platform moving billions treats accessibility as optional. Shame on you, @binance. @_RichardTeng, @cz_binance
So the Pope met with David Axelrod last week. David Axelrod. Obama's campaign architect. A man who is not Catholic, has never met a pope before, and whose entire career has been engineering political narratives for the American left.
And then, by pure coincidence, the Pope immediately started lobbing shots at the Trump administration, and three US Cardinals popped up on 60 Minutes doing the same thing.
All organically, I'm sure.
I'm a practicing Catholic. I need you to understand that part. But in my opinion, Trump has all the right to lash out at him. Maybe you'll disagree, but in the end, Trump talks like Trump. Water is wet. I'm talking about MY Church being run like a DNC satellite office but with a golden throne.
This is the same Vatican that watched governments padlock churches during COVID and said nothing. That let Biden take communion while funding abortion and said nothing. That fired Bishop Strickland for defending actual Church doctrine. That removed Bishop Fernández in Puerto Rico for defending religious exemptions THE CATECHISM ITSELF supports.
But somehow Trump is the threat to human dignity.
Pope Francis was bad. Leo has turned out to be worse. Francis at least was vague about his politics. Leo went and hired the consulting firm.
The man has ignored the slaughter of Christians across Nigeria, the Sahel, India, Syria, Bangladesh, Pakistan. Hundreds of believers murdered, churches burned, pastors kidnapped. His response? Platitudes about dialogue.
OF COURSE he won't even name who's doing the killing.
But he'll fly across continents to make interfaith gestures the week after his people coordinated a media hit on a sitting US president.
The weaponization of belief is obvious. You get the Pope to pick a fight with Trump, and suddenly millions of conservative Catholics have to choose between their faith and their vote.
You’re gonna throw your phone after you see this story.
For 125 years, a group of Catholic nuns in New York have run a FREE hospice called Rosary Hill Home. They take care of poor people dying from cancer no charge, ever. Just pure Christian charity.
Then Gov. Kathy Hochul signed a law a few years ago that forces EVERY nursing home to use preferred pronouns, house patients by gender identity (not biological sex), and let people into opposite-sex bathrooms and spaces.
The nuns said: “We treat everyone with dignity… but we can’t do that. It goes against our Catholic faith.”
So New York is now threatening them with $5,000–$10,000 fines per violation, loss of their license, and jail time.
These sisters who’ve spent their whole lives caring for the dying are being told: obey the gender rules or shut down.
Unbelievable.