🚨BREAKING STUDY: MMR and MMRV Vaccines Linked to 2,657% More U.S. Deaths Than Measles Infection Since 1995
We found an ALARMING number of deaths among infants and toddlers shortly after MMR/MMRV vaccination in VAERS — often involving SIDS, seizures, and cardiac arrest ⬇️
Pharma-captured mass media and public health agencies have centered almost exclusively on the minimal dangers of measles infection and ignored grieving parents whose children were injured or even killed by the shots. No proper attention has been paid to signals emerging within the federal government’s own vaccine safety database.
Now, our new McCullough Foundation study titled “Deaths Following MMR and MMRV Vaccination in the United States,” takes a comprehensive look at reported fatal outcomes following MMR and MMRV vaccination in the United States, doing the work that our public health agencies should have done many years ago.
Our analysis of the federal VAERS safety database identified:
📍536 total global reports of death following MMR or MMRV vaccination
📍299 death reports explicitly attributed to the United States
Among those 299 U.S. reports:
📍60.9% occurred in children under age 2
📍52.2% occurred specifically in the 12–15 month first-MMR dose window
📍52.8% occurred within just 14 days of vaccination
📍40.1% occurred within 7 days
📍74.6% occurred during visits where MMR/MMRV was given alongside additional vaccines
📍Commonly reported clinical presentations included SIDS or sudden unexplained death (24%), seizures (12%), cardiac arrest (8%), fever (15%), respiratory distress (7%), and encephalitis (3%).
The deaths were heavily concentrated in the routine first-dose window and tightly clustered in the days immediately following vaccination.
Since 1995 in the United States:
💉193 MMR/MMRV death reports with identifiable dates have been submitted to VAERS
🦠 7 measles infection–associated deaths have been recorded by the CDC
That represents a 2,657% higher count of reported vaccine-associated deaths compared to measles deaths in the modern era.
Less than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported to VAERS, meaning the number is likely FAR higher.
In conclusion, we identified a serious mortality safety signal following MMR/MMRV vaccination in the United States. A substantial number of reported deaths were documented, with patterns demonstrating pronounced alignment across age, temporality, routine-dose timing, concomitant vaccine exposure, and recurring clinical presentations—including fever, seizures, SIDS, and cardiac arrest.
A vaccine should NEVER be deadlier than the disease.
What a difference 3 years makes. Am I bitter that I was banned 10 times for being wholly accurate in trying to inform so that proper decisions could be made? Yes, I am. The many I didn’t reach while banned, may have rolled up their sleeves and lost their health.
Media and “experts” are not your friends. Pharma owns them both.
When people protesting the crime get a bigger prison sentence than the actual perpetrator of it, then you can be sure this is by design. The mess, the unfairness, the outrage - all created as a problem, so the „solution” can be introduced (enforced). Censorship, digital ID, CBDC.
Former Bank of England deputy Jon Cunliffe compares "Britcoin"—the UK's incoming CBDC—to "giving your children pocket money, but programming the money so that it couldn't be used for sweets".
"These new forms of money offer the ability for them to be... programmed to be released only when something happened."
"There's a whole range of things that [programmable] money could do... which we can't do with the current technology."
Remember, CBDCs can't be rolled out until digital ID is in place first. And if both are allowed to take root, they can be tied to social credit systems and personal carbon allowances—enabling authorities to approve, restrict, or block purchases based on behaviour, location, or carbon footprint.
Once these systems are in place, every transaction becomes a checkpoint. An algorithm could deny your payment—or freeze your account entirely—for refusing a mandated vaccine, sharing "misinformation" on social media, or exceeding your designated personal carbon allowance.
In other words, totalitarian control on an unprecedented scale.
@PhilKonieczny A na Wegrzech nowe prawo, kryminalizujace kupno crypto poza akceptowalnymi kanalami. 2 do 8 lat wiezienia. Oczywiscie aprobowanej listy jeszcze nie ma.
https://t.co/77JQpuX3CC
It's becoming clearer and clearer that we're looking at a seismic shift in the US's relationship with the world, between:
1) The US dismantling its foreign interference apparatuses (like USAID 👇)
2) Marco Rubio stating that we're now in a multipolar world with "multi-great powers in different parts of the planet" (https://t.co/dyHpStHPsO) and that "the postwar global order is not just obsolete; it is now a weapon being used against us" (https://t.co/TPOksRgnwP)
3) The tariffs on supposed "allies" like Mexico, Canada or the EU
This is the US effectively saying "our attempt at running the world is over, to each his own, we're now just another great power, not the 'indispensable nation'."
It looks "dumb" (as the WSJ just wrote) if you are still mentally in the old paradigm but it's always a mistake to think that what the US (or any country) does is dumb.
Hegemony was going to end sooner or later, and now the U.S. is basically choosing to end it on its own terms. It is the post-American world order - brought to you by America itself.
Even the tariffs on allies, viewed under this angle, make sense, as it redefines the concept of "allies": they don't want - or maybe rather can't afford - vassals anymore, but rather relationships that evolve based on current interests.
You can either view it as decline - because it does unquestionably look like the end of the American empire - or as avoiding further decline: controlled withdrawal from imperial commitments in order to focus resources on core national interests rather than being forced into an even messier retreat at a later stage.
In any case it is the end of an era and, while the Trump administration looks like chaos to many observers, they're probably much more attuned to the changing realities of the world and their own country's predicament than their predecessors. Acknowledging the existence of a multipolar world and choosing to operate within it rather than trying to maintain an increasingly costly global hegemony couldn't be delayed much further. It looks messy but it is probably better than maintaining the fiction of American primacy until it eventually collapses under its own weight.
This is not to say that the U.S. won't continue to wreak havoc on the world, and in fact we might be seeing it become even more aggressive than before. Because when it previously was (badly, and very hypocritically) trying to maintain some semblance of self-proclaimed "rules-based order", it now doesn't even have to pretend it is under any constraint, not even the constraint of playing nice with allies. It's the end of the U.S. empire, but definitely not the end of the U.S. as a major disruptive force in world affairs.
All in all this transformation may mark one of the most significant shifts in international relations since the fall of the Soviet Union. And those most unprepared for it, as is already painfully obvious, are America's vassals caught completely flat-footed by the realization that the patron they've relied on for decades is now treating them as just another set of countries to negotiate with.
@elonmusk Voting by raising hands is ridiculous and an abuse. Listen to some members complaining about translation delays and voting speed. It is a mess.
The European Commission offered 𝕏 an illegal secret deal: if we quietly censored speech without telling anyone, they would not fine us.
The other platforms accepted that deal.
𝕏 did not.