@FireRebuild@Hotshot_Movie At D2363? I doubt any, 4.8 miles from your standard location. Wind gusts of 98 on top of 67 sustained? They can't even drop water above 40 mph or so. I give up.
@FireRebuild@Hotshot_Movie The foundation of your presentation is the claim that "hurricane-level winds that reached up to 100 MPH in some locations" is false. Yes, you argue that it wasn't blowing 100 at the initial flare, but your headline is misleading as hell. It did indeed blow 98 on Jan 7.
@mkureth And you don't even show a representation of the actual mountain of the data point I cited. Yours looks very tall and cold. This doesn't catch attention quite as well...
@mkureth Huh... You mean we imagined the Santa Ana winds after eight months without rainfall? It's impossible to think that two years earlier might have had precipitation in December on Mt Lukens. You need to rethink your argument.
@mkureth Huh... "There is No Evidence of Hurricane-Force or 100 MPH Winds During the Palisades Fire". I seem to recall it was still spreading and destroying homes on January 8. When was it contained? Jan 31?
@Hotshot_Movie@FireRebuild The report, flawed as it is, shows 98 mph gust. And I didn't look very hard. Why are you spitting that hair? Yeah, not 100... smh