@JackAChew@GilesHazan Absolutely @GilesHazan websites is definitely something I can help with! I can't seem to send to a DM but if you message me I can chat through it.
I voted for her. I think he’s a bad guy.
But if you lose the senate, house, electoral college AND popular vote, and you think the lesson is half the country is racist, sexist, homophobic, transphobic, and stupid… wrong lesson. And the same thing will likely happen in 2028.
@markreidphysio used to specialise in MSK Physiotherapy. Now he specialises in Marketing. Who better to share wisdom on clinic marketing than someone who's familiar with both sides!
Read Mark's piece in July's #MSKMag here: https://t.co/j54fbPZ71Q
When you ask local people if anything can be built anywhere near them the answer is universally 'no'. We're a nation of NIMBYs and we give those NIMBYs veto power ergo nothing is ever built.
A UK government finally ignoring the NIMBYs and building anything makes a welcome change
Today, Rachel Reeves announced Labour’s changes to planning and housing - and name-checked a proposed site at Worcestershire Parkway within my Droitwich and Evesham constituency.
During the election campaign I expressed grave concerns about Labour's instincts to make top-down decisions that impact the countryside from offices in Whitehall. The local voice should not be ignored.
While we all know we need more housing, it has to be in the right place, on the right scale and with appropriate supporting infrastructure.
Let's also be clear we are talking about building on fields, not previously developed land or brownfield sites here, too.
I shall be seeking further information and assurances from Labour ministers in the coming weeks and would welcome views from local residents who can contact me at [email protected]
Physios are often so concerned about being professional they forget to be themselves!
Give me genuine authenticity over faux politeness any day of the week!
https://t.co/Z17ZwkK9Tj
@keithgraham@OnlinePhysios@ZacharyGrinDPT@rob_chiro@physiorichmond@HeaveyAisling Disagreement is not permitted in this ideology.
For those with some knowledge of history there's a startling similarity to the Inquisitions of the middle ages.
Zachary here is just a modern day 'calificadores' deciding whether someone has committed heresy.
@OnlinePhysios@ZacharyGrinDPT@rob_chiro@physiorichmond@HeaveyAisling This is a really good insight into how absolutist this ideology is.
You can treat trans people with all the same love and respect and dignity that you afford to all, but if you do not accept one key phrase as true, you will be labelled a transphobe.
It is utterly bizarre.
"If you refuse to accept my worldview I will refuse to talk to you."
Religious absolutists. Stubborn 5 yr olds. Activists. All the same tactic.
Grow up.
@ZacharyGrinDPT@physiorichmond@OnlinePhysios@HeaveyAisling I know it's a dangerous world out there where not even a majority of people agree with your core philosophy, but do try to peak out of the echo chamber every now and again. It'll keep you from foolishly acting high and mighty in public.
@ZacharyGrinDPT@physiorichmond@OnlinePhysios@HeaveyAisling You might not want biology to ever matter. But it's tough shit. In some circumstances it does. Evie has quite eloquently explained why it matters to her. Stop trying to dismiss it. People who disagree with you aren't dense. In fact some of them have thought about it A LOT.
@ZacharyGrinDPT@physiorichmond@OnlinePhysios@HeaveyAisling But I can think of two circumstances that are appropriate to this conversation where it is definitely worthwhile differentiating between trans-women and women.
They are:
1) medical consultations (biology matters)
2) sexual encounters (biology matters)
@ZacharyGrinDPT@physiorichmond@OnlinePhysios@HeaveyAisling It's not 'blatantly transphobic' to say that males can't be lesbians. This is your opinion. Stop mistaking your opinion for fact.
You can disagree with Evie's point without lazily attempting to dismiss it as invalid.