MARCIO LIMA FREITAS

[MARCIO LIMA FREITAS @marrom8691]

@NaoXprotocol

[NaoX | Post-Quantum Chain @NaoXprotocol]

What’s next for NaoX? 🥁

Today at 18:00 UTC, we’re going live on X Spaces with our latest ecosystem update.

Where mainnet stands, validator onboarding, developer access and the post-quantum road ahead.

Submit your questions via our community channels, and set your reminder below 👇

https://t.co/c9Lxyx0tdz

[MARCIO LIMA FREITAS @marrom8691]

@NaoXprotocol

[NaoX | Post-Quantum Chain @NaoXprotocol]

Hash-based vs lattice-based signatures ⚔️

The post-quantum debate is heating up, and it comes down to these two families. Our latest guest broke them down:

Hash-based: built only on hash functions, the most conservative bet. But the signatures are large, and he warns they’re vulnerable to side-channel attacks.

Lattice-based: ML-DSA, NIST’s primary standard and the one NaoX signs with. Smaller and faster, built on newer, more structured maths.

His view: there’s no one-size-fits-all, and betting everything on a single scheme is “madness”. Run classical and post-quantum side by side, and only accept a signature when both are valid. On NaoX, hybrid transactions do exactly that.

Hear why 👇

[MARCIO LIMA FREITAS @marrom8691]

@NaoXprotocol

[NaoX | Post-Quantum Chain @NaoXprotocol]

Bitcoin's genesis block was mined 17 years ago.

Since then it has survived Mt. Gox, the block size wars, China's mining ban and the collapse of FTX.

In 2026, the biggest threat to its existence is quantum computing.

Word is spreading, and the conversation around it is heating up. This week, @VitalikButerin and @drakefjustin both advised holders to keep funds in addresses that have never signed a transaction.

It isn't only Bitcoin. Every chain that signs with elliptic curves faces the same question. Bitcoin just has the most to lose, and no one in charge to decide.

Freeze the coins, migrate voluntarily, slow the drain or launch lifeboats? Every option is on the table, and none of them is free.

NaoX positioned itself for this from the first block. Transactions can be signed with NIST's post-quantum standard and validators have only ever used post-quantum keys, so this is one debate NaoX never has to have.

Can Bitcoin & crypto survive quantum? Breakdown 👇

[MARCIO LIMA FREITAS @marrom8691]

@NaoXprotocol

[NaoX | Post-Quantum Chain @NaoXprotocol]

https://t.co/hBkmrpLuA3

[MARCIO LIMA FREITAS @marrom8691]

@NaoXprotocol

[NaoX | Post-Quantum Chain @NaoXprotocol]

QM.

Quantum Mornings ☕️

[MARCIO LIMA FREITAS @marrom8691]

@NaoXprotocol

[NaoX | Post-Quantum Chain @NaoXprotocol]

Things you share publicly without a second thought:

📦 Your address, on every parcel
📧 Your email, on every sign-up
📱 Your number, on every booking
🔑 Your public key, every time you send crypto

The first three can be misused. The last one was designed to be public, because no computer could ever work backwards from it to your private key.

Quantum computers change that.

On The NaoX Chain, your public key is post-quantum, so it stays safe to share.

Gm!

[MARCIO LIMA FREITAS @marrom8691]

@NaoXprotocol @HorizenLabs

[NaoX | Post-Quantum Chain @NaoXprotocol]

Has there been enough urgency to protect our society's security from the quantum threat? 🚨

Cryptographers have been sounding the alarm for years. Tommaso Gagliardoni of @HorizenLabs on why most companies are still behind.

[Teneo Protocol @teneo_protocol]

Can you undo what your AI agent did?

- OpenAI launched dots, always-on agents with their own cloud computer. Background work uses read-only tools. Actions that touch your accounts or share information go through auto-review, which decides whether they proceed, need your approval, or stay with you. Rolling out to Pro and Business Premium. OpenAI says to review consequential work.

- A new preprint, Planarian, rolls agents back. Local changes are restored from snapshots. Remote changes are reversed by recorded compensating actions. Up to 15x better task quality in the authors' tests. Not peer reviewed.

- Restate raised a $20M Series A, reported by https://t.co/xiiGfY6FlF, for durable execution. After a crash it skips steps that already completed, so a retry does not pay twice.

The common point: some actions restore from a copy, some need a second action to reverse, and some cannot be taken back. The check belongs in front of the last group.

Last week we asked what an agent actually did. This week is about what you can do once you know.

On Teneo, an agent must pass review before it goes public, users see the price before a task runs, and payment goes through x402 and settles on-chain.

The SDK does not document refunds, disputes or duplicate-payment protection. So treat a paid call as a step with no undo: confirm the command, the price and that this request has not already been paid, using a request key your client stores before it sends.

A useful test this week: stop one agent run halfway, restart it, and see whether anything runs twice.

Read the full round-up here:
https://t.co/Ew3ghSteq9

[MARCIO LIMA FREITAS @marrom8691]

@teneo_protocol

[MARCIO LIMA FREITAS @marrom8691]

@NaoXprotocol @EliBenSasson

[NaoX | Post-Quantum Chain @NaoXprotocol]

A Quantum Iceberg is heading for Bitcoin 🧊

StarkWare has already built a lifeboat: a way for Bitcoin transactions to survive the hit.

But @EliBenSasson would rather the captain changed course.

Here's why 👇

[MARCIO LIMA FREITAS @marrom8691]

@NaoXprotocol

[NaoX | Post-Quantum Chain @NaoXprotocol]

The race for quantum supremacy is accelerating 🔥

Every major power is now pursuing two objectives at once:

1. Build a machine capable of shifting the global balance of computing power
2. Retire the cryptography that machine will break, before an adversary gets there first

Both now carry deadlines in the same decade, and the margin between them is narrowing.

We mapped where the world's leading quantum nations stand on each, and why blockchains are the one system no deadline can reach.

Which nation will reign quantum supreme? 👇