@sbkaufman Open but critical. ECREE. “Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence”. As a card carrying functionalist, I’m open to this, at least to machine consciousness as a form of ‘access consciousness’, and the latest j-space evidence is intriguing.
@rorysutherland None worse than Left vs. Right Brain nonsense. People are whole brained, and both hemispheres are active in most tasks. Despite the best efforts of neuroscience, and virtually every university, the myth still subsists in marketing.
@OfficialLoganK@emollick People and businesses have put their trust in Gemini, Google and you, to offer a SOTA model, and now risk losing clients unless moving away from Gemini. When - roughly - will 3.5 pro launch?
@glukianoff Dangerously close to thought police, especially if you use AI discursively as your ‘system 3’ extended mind to think things through… Not smart.
@SteveStuWill@ProfByron The Bell Curve cast a long shadow - not much found today in many undergraduate psych courses/text books on IQ, apart from claims that IQ tests are useless.
@DaveVoelkerPhD@CJFerguson1111 You can discount social desirability bias, but not sure you can avoid it unless the subject/respondent doesn’t know they are being observed. Projective techniques are still performative.
@newstart_2024 We said the same about paper. Vector of bad ideas, bad habits, antisocial behaviour - people with their nose in books rather than interacting with others.
@emollick Not convinced? I’ve found this approach; LLMs as conversational thought partners, not cheating tools, as the only solution works in higher ed - but only for those motivated by cognitive engagement. Those open to cognitive surrender will just cheat themselves out of an education…