Para bellum

Truth lover - Les pieds dans la terre, la tête dans les étoiles

[Para bellum @martinpauthenet]

@RichardSwan1982 It’s funny how the more we are supposed to know about climate, the more it becomes catastrophic. Thausends of years the same events happened, except we didn’t have the ipcc and the media telling us it’s our fault 🤣

[Para bellum @martinpauthenet]

@volcaholic1 The only existential crisis here is your own buddy

[Para bellum @martinpauthenet]

@FonfredeMichel L’effet de serre n’existe pas. Il n’y a que de l’air plus ou moins humide que le sol échauffe par contact et rayonnement. Ces calories s’évacuent ensuite par convection, et rayonnement aux hautes altitudes, où la densité de l’air chute. Le rétro rayonnement est une contradiction.

[Para bellum @martinpauthenet]

@welp_max Physics said no, dumbass

[Para bellum @martinpauthenet]

@volcaholic1 It’s crazy how crystal clear it has become that climate activism is just another manipulative form of projection in which the speaker attributes their own thoughts or intentions to the other person as if they originated from them

[fonfrede michel @FonfredeMichel]

On a pas besoin de scientifiques pour simplement lire ce graphique non contesté même par le GIEC et voir que depuis 10 000ans il y a des changements climatiques entre -2° et +2° ce qui a bien été constaté depuis nos derniers 2000ans ce qui montre que ce concept de changement climatique soit disant nouveau et soit disant à cause du CO2 et des chats est une pure escroquerie intellectuelle qui devrait être poursuivie en pénal - on a beaucoup de scientifiques qui ne savent surement pas lire normal ...

[Para bellum @martinpauthenet]

@robinmonotti @socratesccost A scientist showed me a plot supposed to prove co2 influences temperatures. It showed a mean temperature correlated to co2 levels, over periods of thausend years. I said “the same time period as the milankovitch cycles, right ?”
He said “yes”, not realizing the causality issue.

[Robin Monotti @robinmonotti]

THE CHANGING SUN-EARTH DISTANCE CAUSE CLIMATE CHANGE, NOT CO2!

Before you buy the CO2/carbon "anthropogenic climate change (false) narrative", study these Solar Cycles:

Milakovitch Cycles (10-400,000 yr)
Bray-Hallstatt (2100-2500 yr)
Eddy (800-1200 yr)
Suess-de Vries (200-250 yr)
Jose (155-185 yr)
Gleissberg (80-100 year)
Spectral cluster (55-65 yr)
Schwabe (11 years)

These cycles all affect the Sun Earth distance, and are the real cause of climate change on planet Earth.

CO2 is a result of climate change, not the cause. The cause is always the Sun.

[Electroverse @Electroversenet]

Professor Emeritus Dr Ian Plimer calls it "the great CO2 fraud."

For decades we have been told that human CO2 drives global warming, but Plimer points out: "No one has ever demonstrated that human emissions drive temperature."

Ice cores show the opposite of the narrative.

"Temperature rises first," says Plimer, "and only centuries later does CO2 follow."

For more than 200 years, chemistry has shown that CO2 is the gas of life, not a pollutant and not a threat.

The planet is far greener today because of higher atmospheric CO2 levels, and crop yields are breaking records.

According to Plimer, 'runaway warming' is not science, it is propaganda built on inversion and fear.

[Robin Monotti @robinmonotti]

THE MYTH OF "SCIENTIFIC CONSENSUS"

I worked at several Universities: academics & scientists never agree on anything. The idea of "scientific consensus" is a myth. There is only mob behaviour in the media & politicians that wants you to believe consensus exists. Professor Ioannidis explains what happens to scientists when they disagree with the media narrative & political narrative, especially during Covid, but the same applies today with relation to the alleged causes of any alleged global warming.

There is no "scientific consensus", there never was a "scientific consensus" and never will be "scientific consensus" about anything and that is a good thing.

Science means disagreement, that is how new theories evolve.

Do not comply to the mob rule of consensus: it is a political & corporate media illusion. Treasure doubt & disagreement. Do not trust those who tell you it does not exist. That is how they manipulate us and herd us to where they profit from the masses for the benefit of the few.

[Para bellum @martinpauthenet]

@nickofnz Do you realize you are part of a cult ?

[Para bellum @martinpauthenet]

@StevenTual_off Qu’est-ce que tu veux de plus? C’est l’été. On en a plein le c… à la fin de vous l’expliquer, soignez vos troubles anxieux.

[Para bellum @martinpauthenet]

@Jonathan_K_Cook A claim, so undeniable that you need to call people questioning it “climate deniers”,
So settled that you fear reviewing the modern scientific literature,
Should be (and will be) absolutely questioned and studied more and more. Science will never comply to a false narrative.

[Para bellum @martinpauthenet]

@Nain_Portekoi Les gauchistes vous êtes les seuls à regarder la couleur de peau. Posez-vous des questions

[Para bellum @martinpauthenet]

@Heccles94 You should get an alert to learn atmospheric physics (the basic, really) and stop scaring people with co2 emissions. It doesn’t have much to do with wildfires. Ho and fix that anxiety, that’s a big health issue impacting yourself and people in your environment.

[Para bellum @martinpauthenet]

@pmagn @nickofnz Being told to stfu doesn’t mean you’re right. That would be a silly deduction.
Being told to stfu by rich people… also doesn’t mean you are right. Only that you may hurt some profit by saying/writing bs 😅

[Para bellum @martinpauthenet]

@fjpaine @Seanj87 CO2 is mixed in the atmosphere by several mechanisms. For example strong storms break through the tropospheric boundary. Once in thin air, co2 can radiate freely to space and act as a coolant. See it’s not that simple…

[Para bellum @martinpauthenet]

@fjpaine @Seanj87 Completely wrong: CO2 is not a reflective particle (contrary to aerosols or water droplets). CO2 is absorbing infrared, then re-emeting to whatever wants to absorb it (like… space from the top of the atmosphere).

[Para bellum @martinpauthenet]

@fjpaine @Seanj87 CO2 is not “trapping heat”. The earth naturally cools down by convection, water phase changes, and radiation TOA. CO2 is extremely minor contributor vs water. Oceans have thousands times more heat capacity than atmosphere. With solar activity, they are the drivers of climate.