masedewek

[masedewek @masedewek]

Came across this group and decided to take a look.
The market discussions turned out to be surprisingly useful.
DM the assistant to join 👇
https://t.co/pFqMx55ytU

[masedewek @masedewek]

@SolanaHub_ @Pumpfun @jito I used to put off noting what was expected before the announcement. Now I make time for it.
@sabriciasf

[masedewek @masedewek]

@XRPcryptowolf Comparing percentage moves over matching periods makes it easier to see the reasoning in my notes.
@myselfqurbanali

[masedewek @masedewek]

@icooperTrades I started with one question: how could I give the opposite reading a fair look? Listing one fact that challenged each idea helped.
@AmarBahong

[masedewek @masedewek]

@BitcoinIntelX The change I kept returning to was dating chart labels that referred to future events.
@cacaardelia06

[masedewek @masedewek]

@leshka_eth One small lesson from my journal: keeping one annotation color for open questions helps me find uncertainty quickly during the review.
@Mmacciiuv

[masedewek @masedewek]

@flipski77 The useful change for me was keeping examples of questions that improved my preparation.
@marjelcntikk

[masedewek @masedewek]

@KhalifaJnr_7 The useful change for me was writing a fresh summary after a long delay.
@MeechaiTan38721

[masedewek @masedewek]

@amitisinvesting Separating completed volume bars from developing ones made the journal easier to learn from.

[masedewek @masedewek]

@DKellerCMT I wanted to see how the full trade developed, so I started reviewing the sequence of adjustments rather than only the final exit.

[masedewek @masedewek]

@coinbureau I started with writing the local time and exchange time together. That helped me make old notes easier to interpret.

[masedewek @masedewek]

@zerohedge My review process includes comparing retests under similar conditions for a reason: it helps me make the examples in my journal more useful.

[masedewek @masedewek]

@himgajria Keeping planned exits next to actual exits is a small habit that makes my reviews clearer.

[masedewek @masedewek]

@zerohedge I have been refining one small habit: checking the space left after a delayed entry.

[masedewek @masedewek]

@MhagamaFau31375 Reviewing simultaneous losses as a group gave me better context for the next review.

[masedewek @masedewek]

@CryptoSays I spend a bit more time recording the first invalidation idea even if I rejected it now, and the reviews are clearer.

[masedewek @masedewek]

@MarioNawfal I put comparing missed trades with the conditions I required into my routine, and kept it there.

[masedewek @masedewek]

@KCTrades777 @OptionsFunding_ I began keeping the event source next to the calendar entry to give my later reviews a better reference.

[masedewek @masedewek]

@snorlax_uw I found it useful to review the conditions surrounding the fill. Keeping bid and ask observations near the order time gave me a way to do that.

[masedewek @masedewek]

@MatthewHyland_ A useful detail in my process has been checking whether a news item referred to a new development.

[masedewek @masedewek]

@MarioNawfal I made checking whether two labels described the same behavior part of my routine to keep the journal categories from overlapping.