Maslin Edwin

Building AI at @nowahapp | Ex @Donatuz_ | Ex Comms @nearprotocol , @terra_money | Mech Engg | Believer | Tweets are not Financial Advice.

[Maslin Edwin @maslinedwin]

@JayJaboneta @claudeai LFG!!

[Maslin Edwin @maslinedwin]

@adnansahinovich + On multiple screen sizes too.
+ what looks great on IPhone 16 pro does not look the same on iPhone 14 Pro

[Maslin Edwin @maslinedwin]

@MartinGTobias @openclaw Welcome to the dark side

1. Build a dashboard
2. Create skills for your workflows
3. Don’t download shitty skills from the skill hub
4. Test each flow - make it work
5. Spend time on perfecting the memory
6. Don’t sleep ever

[Maslin Edwin @maslinedwin]

@sreeramkannan 🫡🫡

[Maslin Edwin @maslinedwin]

@betomoedano @betomoedano Is it possible to have one of the icons in nav bar elevated - in the new IOS glass theme? like the center one out of 5? right now all you can have is flat.

[Maslin Edwin @maslinedwin]

@sreeramkannan 💛💛

[Maslin Edwin @maslinedwin]

@KyleSamani Most of them wont partner with the other because it threatens their business model. You are not going to let go of your discovery pipeline and lose money.

Labs vs OTAs - the handshake is painful.

[Maslin Edwin @maslinedwin]

There’s a big difference between Claude code and Claude messages API.

Running any plan from Claude code through Claude messages gives you the gaps that you need to fill.

Two to three passes - you have a better plan.

As if Claude code is built to only Optimise for the short term execution based on current context to give you the easiest route while Claude messages/chat is more open researches, compares, fills the holes.

If you don’t do it and just blindly approve plans, you end up with packages and tools that are not managed anymore, short fixes that are not shippable for production… etc

Any choice you make, verify with Claude Messages API or chat.

[Maslin Edwin @maslinedwin]

@atShruti DM'ed

[Maslin Edwin @maslinedwin]

Turned 28 a few days ago..

Stepped up. Did the hard, right things. Owned the truth. Took the hits.

Watched good people fold. Chose comfort over courage. Betrayals? It burned deep.

Faith pulled me through.

Like Charlie Kirk says:

“Stand on the rock. God's got the fight. No excuses.”

This year? Fear's done. All in. Heart exposed. Risks maxed. No retreats.

We don't knock on doors. We claim them.

[Maslin Edwin @maslinedwin]

@JDVance this is bad.. hope he is okay.

[Maslin Edwin @maslinedwin]

Web2 sold creators out for ad money.

Web3 gave us keys, but scattered them like dumbasses across 300+ platforms.

Dontauz is the fix..

[Maslin Edwin @maslinedwin]

If your “creator platform” is just a token vending machine ~ you're not empowering creators.

You're selling their fans out.
That’s not innovation.

That’s exploitation.

Keep playing stupid games… and you’ll get stupid results.

[Donatuz @Donatuz_]

AI should not replace creators.

It should expand what they can do.

Agents, avatars, immersive experiences owned and governed by the creator themselves.

[Donatuz @Donatuz_]

We didn’t build Donatuz to compete for attention.

We built it so creators can operate without asking platforms for permission.

Sovereignty isn’t a feature.

It’s the architecture.

[Donatuz @Donatuz_]

- Monetization.
- Data.
- Intelligence.

Not scattered features, but primitives of the creator economy itself.

That’s the system of record we’re building.

[Donatuz @Donatuz_]

Subscriptions,
Paid calls,
Credit DM,
Group chats and Tips.

All borderless and unified.

With Donatuz, every monetization primitive finally lives in one super app for creators.

[Donatuz @Donatuz_]

The future of creation will not be written by platforms.

It will be written by the people who own their work, their audience, and their data.

That is what we are protecting.
That is what we are building.

We are setting the architecture for permanence.

[Donatuz @Donatuz_]

The last year has been a study in silence.

While the creator economy raced forward on fragmented rails, we took a different path. We didn’t chase hype. We didn’t ship for noise. We built.

Because what creators need is not another platform competing for attention. What they need is a foundation.

Donatuz began as a simple solution to a visible problem: fragmented monetization. Subscriptions in one place, calls in another, streams somewhere else. No creator could operate from a single source of truth.

But the deeper we went, the more we realized that fixing fragmentation was just the surface. The real work is about architecture.

And that’s where our story truly begins.

[Donatuz @Donatuz_]

Foundations do not begin in public noise!

The creator economy is fractured. Too many platforms, too many leaks in ownership, and too much control taken from creators. That is why we built Donatuz: to bring structure, sovereignty, and scale.

We began with a clear goal: giving creators control over their monetization, their data, and their future. But as we built in private, a bigger truth emerged. Creators do not just need tools. They need infrastructure. An operating system. A foundation.

The word “platform” is not enough for what we are building.

This is not about competing for attention. It is about grounding creation in consent, ownership, clarity, and permanence.

So here is where we stand now: foundational, intentional, quietly building the layer that others can rely on.

more soon.