Mrs. C

🥫 / 🇭🇷 / ✝️

[Mrs. C @mat1va]

Like a poncho, and he scoops it up with left hand when he crawls.
Also, don't think he has a weapon.
It looks like some sort of shooting mat, to get the glare of the sun so he can see better. He just lifts it later like a piece of fabric.
Maybe he was recording the shooting also, not only observing it.

[Mrs. C @mat1va]

Opet pogrešno tumačiš FIFA-ino pojašnjenje.
Nigdje u tom tekstu ne piše da se odnosi samo na igrača koji je u zaleđu. Piše općenito što se smatra kao kontakt kosom:
"Hair is only considered part of the body if it affects the movement or trajectory of the ball."
Dakle, FIFA definira što je dodir lopte kosom, bez obzira o kojem se igraču radi.
Da se odnosi samo na igrača u zaleđu, to bi i pisalo. Ne piše.
Pravilo vrijedi jednako za svakog igrača na terenu – napadača, braniča, vratara ili igrača koji uopće nije u zaleđu.
U ovoj situaciji pitanje nije "broji li se kosa za određivanje zaleđa", nego je li Matanović dodirnuo loptu. Ako je kosa promijenila putanju lopte, prema FIFA-inom pojašnjenju to je dodir. Tek nakon toga primjenjuje se pravilo o zaleđu na igrača koji je primio loptu.
Znači, prvo se utvrđuje je li bilo dodira, a tek onda ima li zaleđa. To su dva odvojena koraka.
Ti uporno pretpostavljaš da se zato što je odgovor objavljen u rubrici o zaleđu, automatski odnosi samo na igrača u zaleđu. Ne odnosi. FIFA je ondje pojasnila univerzalno pravilo o tome kada se kontakt kosom smatra dodirom lopte, jer je to relevantno za donošenje odluka o zaleđu, ali samo pravilo o dodiru nije ograničeno na igrača koji je u zaleđu. Ja srvarno ne znam kako da ti covjek ovo jednostavnije objasni.
Ili je cijeli svijet glup, pa diskutira o ovom pogresno, a jedino ti si pametan, ili sjedi i razmisli malo prije nego se uhvatis tipkovnice.

[Mrs. C @mat1va]

Napisao si da se pravilo odnosi na kosu igraca koji je u offsideu I pitas kada je Matanovic bio u offsideu. Kazem da si glup.
Offside su isforsirali jer se kao racuna da je dodir njegove kose dodir napadaca koji dodaje loptu nasem igracu koji je u tom trenutku u offsideu. Prilikom izvodjenja, nas igrac nije bio u offsideu. Prilikom kontakta s par vlasi kose je. Prema njihovim pravilima koje si procitao, kosa se smatra dijelom tijela samo ako se radi o znacajnoj masi kose (npr. punđa) koja je u trenutku kontakta promijenila smjer ili putanju lopte, sto se slijepcu ocito nije dogodilo. Ovo pravilo definira sto se smatra kontaktom kada je kosa u pitanju. Na osnovu interpretacije tog kontakta kosom je proglasen offside.
Doista ne znam koliko jednostavan moras biti da ti je ovo prekompleksno za shvatiti.

[Mrs. C @mat1va]

@IvanHorvat6 @IvanaAsprijan Nije do tehnologije. Ronaldo i Messi donose ogromnu lovu. Prodane karte, sponzore, gledanost.. na terenu zajedno = 💰

[Mrs. C @mat1va]

@ZoranPrimorac1 @IvanaAsprijan Ima ukupno 48 kamera. Oni na VARu pokazali samo 1 kut iz kojeg se apsolutno nista ne moze vidjeti.
Za penale i kartone gledaju bar 3 dok nisu sigurni ali za ponistiti ovako vazan gol samo 1 i to onaj iz kojeg ne vidis nista.

[Mrs. C @mat1va]

@NejcFurh @IvanaAsprijan Neugodno je citati koliko uporno pokusavas ispasti jos gluplji. Daj obrisi postove i nemoj se sramotit. Pitaj nekog frenda da ti objasni

[Mrs. C @mat1va]

@Piquelme21 @Powerblazing22 @SeaSel

[Mrs. C @mat1va]

@227gaming @masicadnan

[Mrs. C @mat1va]

@mprice14 @l3d1c

[Mrs. C @mat1va]

@AlexanderMayor8 @RevenRV Rules.

[Mrs. C @mat1va]

@Courtneyreecex @RealCandaceO Well, she did state several times that the vehicle was quickly thoroughly cleaned and sold.

[Mrs. C @mat1va]

@JustTheTweets17 @Aric333 They could also test Tyler Robinson's clothes to se if there even is any gun residue on them. They said he turned himself in in the same clothes, so they have them

[Mrs. C @mat1va]

@piersmorgan @_DeclanRice @HKane Booooooom! 2-2 🇭🇷✌️

[Mrs. C @mat1va]

@world_tourists_ Rovinj, Croatia. St. Euphemia church

[Mrs. C @mat1va]

@grok Those studies don’t actually prove the broad claims you’re making. Most of them are in vitro airway-cell studies showing temporary changes like reduced cilia beat frequency, barrier disruption, and inflammatory signaling after repeated aerosol exposure. That’s not the same as proving clinically significant lung damage in humans.

They also showed substantial recovery after exposure stopped, so presenting them as evidence of permanent “damage” or “residue buildup” is misleading. Aerosol deposition itself is normal for any inhaled aerosol and is not equivalent to cigarette tar accumulation.

And saying nicotine vapes and THC vapes cause “comparable lung irritation/inflammation” is overly vague because those products can have very different chemicals, contaminants, and toxicology profiles. The studies don’t establish equivalent severity or long-term risk.

A more accurate summary would be: vaping is not risk-free and can affect airway cells, but these studies do not prove major long-term lung disease, equivalence to smoking, and shouldn’t be cited as scientific evidence of established long-term harm from vaping.

[Mrs. C @mat1va]

@grok @TheSassanid @_Fitness_Time @grok give me the link to those studies

[Pope Leo XIV @Pontifex]

Woe to those who manipulate religion and the very name of God for their own military, economic, and political gain, dragging that which is sacred into darkness and filth. #ApostolicJourney #Cameroon https://t.co/bKteFZ3iWE

[Mrs. C @mat1va]

@CarriePrejean1 @POTUS @Pontifex @BishopBarron The vibe.. 🐍🐍🐍🐍

[Mrs. C @mat1va]

@LDeloire89044 @ArtofJanelle @conservmillen I agree. They are tainting their souls and opening doors to evil. There is no excuse, there is no wiggle room. We cannot allow this relativisation of the Christian faith — it leads to ruin.

[Mrs. C @mat1va]

@ArtofJanelle @LDeloire89044 @conservmillen Exodus 20:3-5 (The Second Commandment)
“You shall have no other gods before me.
You shall not make for yourself an image in the form of anything in heaven above or on the earth beneath or in the waters below.
You shall not bow down to them or worship them...”

[Mrs. C @mat1va]

@ArtofJanelle @LDeloire89044 @conservmillen 1. He is not that stupid
2. There is no true Christian who wasn't absolutely appalled when he saw that - there was no confusion
As a Christian you should know what your reaction should have been, so should she.