@zordovitsch@martypartymusic@wintermute_t Agreed, lower … Bitcoin always dips over the summer… Now we have serious other factors pointing towards downward momentum. And yes, we are in the four-year bear cycle for Bitcoin. Remember
Today’s Supreme Court decision effectively guts a key pillar of the Voting Rights Act, freeing state legislatures to gerrymander legislative districts to systematically dilute and weaken the voting power of racial minorities - so long as they do it under the guise of “partisanship” rather than explicit “racial bias.” And it serves as just one more example of how a majority of the current Court seems intent on abandoning its vital role in ensuring equal participation in our democracy and protecting the rights of minority groups against majority overreach.
The good news is that such setbacks can be overcome. But that will only happen if citizens across the country who cherish our democratic ideals continue to mobilize and vote in record numbers - not just in the upcoming midterms or in high profile races, but in every election and every level.
@weeklyshowpod@ben_mckenzie Pennies compared to the trillion in theft from the government… ooops where did that 9 trillion dollars go from the pentagon budget ?
Short answer: it’s directionally pointing at a real phenomenon (derivatives can influence price), but the core claim that Bitcoin’s supply has become “theoretically infinite” is economically incorrect. It conflates synthetic exposure with physical supply and overstates how price discovery works in modern markets.
I’ll break this down rigorously.
⸻
1. Does derivatives trading change price discovery?
Yes — but not in the way the post claims.
In any mature asset:
•Spot markets exist.
•Derivatives (futures, options, swaps) exist.
•Arbitrage links them.
Price discovery migrates toward the venue with:
•Most liquidity
•Lowest friction
•Highest leverage
•Deepest participation
In many commodities (gold, oil), futures markets often lead price discovery. That does not mean supply becomes infinite. It means expectations get priced faster than physical delivery flows.
Bitcoin is no different:
•CME futures
•Perpetual swaps (Binance, etc.)
•Options markets
•ETFs
•Prime broker lending
These absolutely influence short-term price volatility.
But they do not alter the 21 million supply cap.
⸻
2. “Synthetic supply makes scarcity infinite”
This is where the argument breaks.
There are two distinct concepts:
A) Monetary supply (actual BTC)
Hard capped at 21M.
On-chain settlement is final.
No derivatives instrument can mint real BTC.
B) Synthetic exposure
Derivatives create price exposure without moving coins.
That’s leverage, not supply.
If I short 1 BTC futures:
•I do not create 1 new BTC.
•I create a contract that must be settled (cash or physically).
•The counterparty is long.
Net supply remains zero-sum.
⸻
3. “Six claims on one coin” argument
This sounds alarming but misunderstands how balance sheets net.
Example:
One real BTC exists.
You might have:
•ETF share representing it
•A futures long
•A futures short
•An options position
•A broker loan collateralized by it
But these positions net out across counterparties.
For every synthetic long there is a synthetic short.
You do not create six additional BTC.
You create six offsetting financial claims.
That’s leverage layered on top of a base asset — not supply multiplication.
⸻
4. Can derivatives suppress price?
Yes — temporarily.
Mechanisms:
•Shorting into thin liquidity
•Forcing liquidation cascades
•Funding-rate pressure in perpetuals
•Basis trades via ETFs
This can:
•Amplify volatility
•Trigger short-term downward spikes
•Create reflexive deleveraging events
But this is cyclical.
If underlying spot demand is strong, shorts must eventually cover.
Unlike gold:
Bitcoin has:
•Transparent on-chain supply
•Auditable issuance
•Fixed issuance schedule
•No central vault
You cannot secretly create new BTC bars.
⸻
5. Gold comparison: not perfectly analogous
Gold’s “paper gold” system (LBMA/COMEX):
•Centralized custodians
•Opaque rehypothecation
•Settlement rarely demands physical
•Large bullion banks
Bitcoin differences:
•Anyone can withdraw to self-custody
•On-chain settlement is open
•ETF shares can be arbitraged
•Exchange balances are visible
•Proof-of-reserves culture exists (imperfect, but improving)
If synthetic claims grow too large relative to real supply, the system is self-correcting via:
•Withdrawal squeezes
•Short squeezes
•Custody migrations
That’s structurally harder to suppress long-term.
⸻
6. The “Synthetic Float Ratio (SFR)”
This is not a recognized, standardized financial metric.
It’s an interpretive framework.
Useful for thinking about:
•Open interest vs circulating supply
•ETF AUM vs exchange balances
•Leverage ratios
But calling it proof that scarcity is gone is not analytically sound.
⸻
7. What actually determines Bitcoin price?
Marginal buyers and sellers set price.
Not total supply.
Not total synthetic contracts.
Not total coins ever mined.
@PeterSchiff His choice is an engineered manufactured market crash for precious metals and Bitcoin… Ultimately able to buy it cheaper prices before bitcoin has made the global reserve currency.
And gold store of value. Silver obviously used for so many things in manufacturing.
@SwipeWright He pulled out his gun while she was backing up in order to turn and move forward on the road. Yes, he pulled his gun before she was moving forward in the car.