Richard Josef Schindler

Nach Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz eine Monade: ein denkendes Ich als metaphysisches Subjekt nach Ludwig Wittgenstein. Juden sind meine geistigen Vorfahren

[Richard Josef Schindler @MathRJSchindler]

The logical-algebraic text

The Illustration of the Spirit: Christianity as a confessional subgroup of Judaism in the mirror of Wittgenstein's algebra

The historical structure of religions can be described as a family of algebraic structures whose transformations follow mathematical laws of symmetry. Ludwig Wittgenstein is used here as the greatest algebraic in intellectual history: he has recognized that systems do not operate via substantial entities, but via the linking rules of their linguistic elements - via the concept of meaning within defined groups.

I. The algebraic matrix of divisions

In this model, primitive Judaism forms the mathematical superset $J$. The emergence of Christianity is not an external creation, but a genuine split of faith, therefore the formation of an internal subgroup $U_C \subset J$.

Using Wittgenstein's concept of structure, the historical development of the West can be presented as a progressive fractionation of this matrix. The denominational final states are consequently formalized as Catholic Jews and Protestant Jews. This algebraic notation breaks up the historical symmetry: it forces the observer to the rational insight that the evolutionary line of the Christian denominations remains invariantly bound to their original Jewish matrix. The separation of the Western Roman Patriarchate from the East Byzantine Patriarchate represents in this coordinate system a classical orthogonal transformation of the common space of origin, a topological shift that Joseph Ratzinger also recognized in his structural theory of the Church.

{Superset: Judaism (J) } ~ (Jesus of Nazareth) := {Subgroup: Christianity (U_C) } = { Eastern Roman Patriarchate (Byzante)} ˋ+´

{West Roman Patriarchate (Rome)} ˋ:´ (splitting of faith)

= : { "Catholic Jews"} ˋ+´ { "Protestant Jews" }

II. The dualism of truth concepts according to Wittgenstein

At this point, the genius of Ludwig Wittgenstein unfolds, who mathematically isolates the dynamics between two conflicting systems:

1 The materialistic worldview of physics: It operates as a closed system in which "sense" is strictly defined as the representation of empirical facts in space. For this group, metaphysical truth is an element outside the definition range.

2 The religious truth of the Catholic Church: It constitutes an independent system with inverse linking rules. Here the meaning is generated by the transcendent orientation and the performative life form.

Wittgenstein resolves the apparent contradiction by showing that both systems can coexist as mathematical groups as long as their grammar is not mixed. Philosophy of religion becomes a pure structural doctrine for him.

III. The structural change under Eugenio Pacelli

In this mathematical series fits the term of office of Eugenio Pacelli (Pius XII) as a decisive operator.

For centuries, the Catholic group was blocked by a rigid, anti-Judaist axiom, which essentially went back to the replacement theory since Augustine of Hippo. Pacelli radically modified the internal linking rules of this group.

Through his encyclical Mystici Corporis and the redefinition of the relationship with Judaism, he initiated a structural transformation. He shifted the coordinates away from exclusion to a recognition of common symmetry. The Jews were thus formally defined mathematically as the irreplaceable "spiritual ancestors" - as the fundamental axiom system of Catholicism. In his analytical conversations with Peter Seewald, Joseph Ratzinger confirmed Pacelli's structural achievement by identifying him as the one who created the logical prerequisites for the Second Vatican Council.

[Richard Josef Schindler @MathRJSchindler]

Das ist wir mit den Schwalben jeder Schwalben zu sehen sind um so gewisser kommt der Sommer Das Nius die „Phythi“ “ des Markus Lanz als aprognostikrr der Zeiten Wende sieht beweist wie tief in Deutschland die exakten Wissenschaften gesunken sind oder wie sehr Nius in der Gunst der unexaktenbalkes wisser gestiegen ist

[Richard Josef Schindler @MathRJSchindler]

Wrong that is a conclusion that is not proveable because the Personal Situation before abortion is not reflected my be the women get no help by the catholic Church or the Social System dont offer the other possiblity not the woman is wrong you have to Analyse the sozio kulturelle circumstances
The catholic church will produced bad feeling but dont offer help so the life of Jesus is not in the Spirit of the catholic church that is a contradiction to the Parable of the Merciful Samaritan
@BishopBarron

[Richard Josef Schindler @MathRJSchindler]

Das ist nicht demütig oder tolerant und es ist eine abwertung von menschen. zentral verstösst das gegen Mt 7 1-2 Man sollte ursachen nennen. Das ist eine provaktion solche pauschale abwertungen darzustellen. Anders ist es mit dogmatischen , ideologisierten Meinung oder unsachliche Trugschlüsse zu analysieren. Nicht jeder Mensch ist fähig Gedanken vernünftig nach eigenen Wertmaßstäben zu formulieren. Das ist unvernünftiges Handeln in der menschlichen Sphäre.

[Richard Josef Schindler @MathRJSchindler]

Part XXVIII.4 Three postulates and their limits

Postulate 1: The Ukraine & Religion Dilemma

In his book „Licht der Welt“ in conversation with Peter Seewald, Joseph Ratzinger (Benedict XVI) shows how conflicts must be tackled at the root: through deep theological dialogue, as he himself appreciated with the later Orthodox Patriarch of Moscow. Eugenio Pacelli (Pius XII) also relied on precise structures of international law instead of pure rhetoric and practical help against the Holocoust

The dialectical border: In Ukraine, mere peace rhetoric fails today because it obscures the historical conflicts and similarities between Catholics, Orthodox and Jews. Can a system be permanently stable if it ignores the religious or political variables of the past?

#Theology #Ratzinger #Ukraine #Dialectics #LightTheWorld

Postulate 2 : Migration

Trump’s policy of ending wars and developing the Orient or Central America economically (e.g. via the World Cup) creates real perspectives. But one system has time delays.

The dialectical boundary: The story of Joseph and his brothers can be used as a structure of three biblical migration accounts. The text serves as an operationalizable foundation for political or moral discourse and offers the statement against postmodern arbitrariness:

1. Against the dissolution of the concept of family: All three migration reports prove that stable social systems are not based on abstract state welfare structures, but on the inviolability of the family. Where the family is suppressed or destroyed by the cancellation of the vertical transfer of knowledge (the elders are no longer heard), the culture collapses.

2. The rationality of the Christian Jewish tradition: The triple reference to Egypt shows that the Bible is not a confused narrative. It obeys an inner, almost mathematical symmetry. As the personified Israel, Jesus goes through all migration phases (abduction/asylum, return, removal) in his own biography.

When the five books of Moses call for the protection of the stranger, Exodus 22, 20 „You shall not exploit or exploit a stranger, for you yourself have been strangers in the land of Egypt“

But dogmatism fails because of reality. What does a fair solution for a lived life look like?

#Migration #Ethics #Realpolitik

Postulate 3: Matrix of the three migration phases

Through the translation of historical conflicts into systems-theoretical models, ideological debates are on-enlightened. Politics as an art of possibility becomes mathematically describable as interaction within closed or open systems.

Phase 1: Joseph’s Abduction

Migration type: Forced single migration (asymmetric transfer).

System state: Acute conflict in the system of origin (envy entropy).

Knowledge function: Pure knowledge transfer: The thinker knowledge translated by the father is operationalized in Egypt.

Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz also stands for the historical elite mobility in the 17th. /18. Century .

Target size: Administrative integration at the top of the hierarchy.

Phase 2: Jakob’s family reunification

Migration type: Voluntary, united family reunification.

System condition: Scarcity of resources in the country of origin (famine/crisis).

Knowledge function: System protection: Integration of a stable tribal structure (70 souls) as a closed unit.

Target size: Economic protection in the granary (Gosen).

Phase 3: The Exodus (Moses)

Migration type: labor migration that has fallen into state oppression.

State of the system: Total degradation of freedom; destruction of family autonomy.

Knowledge function: Knowledge-Abruption: The traditional cultural knowledge collides with the Egyptian slave bureaucracy.

Target size: restoration of freedom; departure into the unknown primordial homeland.

@JKraschl , @WhiteHouse , @PressSec , @BishopBarron

[Richard Josef Schindler @MathRJSchindler]

@elonmusk_elp two

[Richard Josef Schindler @MathRJSchindler]

Part XXVIII.3 Analytical System Sketch

1. The logical bridge: Thomas Aquinas and Ludwig Wittgenstein

The connection between Thomas Aquinas and Ludwig Wittgenstein provides the decisive epistemic tool („the fishing hook“) to understand religious language in the 21st century. Century to make intellectually satisfactory:

Thomas Aquinas is a razor-sharp distinction between concepts (essentence) and existence. He demands that theological sentences must obey the sentence of contradiction. God is the prima causa, whose existence can be deduced logically and deductively from the contingency of the world.

Wittgenstein’s language games and grammar: Wittgenstein shows in his philosophical investigations that the meaning of a word in its use lies within a certain life form. He breaks with the naive positivism, which religious language as „meaningless“. Religious statements have their own, deeply logical deep grammar.

The synthesis according to the dialectic of a Rupert Lay to transfer beliefs to others or to solve communicative problems.

Religious sentences have an objective reference character. They describe real-life. Wittgenstein’s method serves as a protective shield against a reductionist scientism: it proves that rational argumentation is not limited to the empirical natural sciences, but can be precisely continued in the field of metaphysical.

2. The teaching continuity: Eugenio Pacelli and Joseph Ratzinger

This strict, rational claim permeates the lines of thought of the most formative theological popes of the 20th century. Century, which turned against the dismantling of reason in modernity:

Eugenio Pacelli (Pope Pius XII): In his encyclical Humani Generis (1950) Pacelli vehemently defended the classical philosophy of Thomas Aquinas (the Philosophia Perennis) against existentialist relativizations. He emphasized that human reason is able to recognize with certainty the existence of a personal god by its own strength. He thus established a clear, rational foundation against cognitive arbitrariness.

Joseph Ratzinger (Pope Benedict XVI): Ratzinger continued this project through his criticism of the „deconstruction of reason“. In his famous Regensburg lecture (2006) he postulated the indissoluble synthesis between biblical faith and Greek philosophical thought (Logos). For Ratzinger, a faith without reason is unchristian and pathological. God does not act against the logos. Theology is therefore always logical accountability (Logike Latreia).

3. Contemporary operationalization

Between systems theory, analytical thinking and belief, classical theological arguments (such as the doctrine of the soul or proof of God) can be scientifically reformulated with a precise manner. Thus, theological dogmas like rational axioms can function in a consistent overall system.

The problem then remains after David Hume „An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals“ which is regarded as honest and credible by the individual. An elite thinking against common sense then leads to the endangering of a system because of the ignorance of life realities, because financial and socio-cultural boundaries on site must be secured by jobs, security and stable family structures.

Rationally interpretable data of perception and beliefs are to be made mathematically-logically compatible with the natural experience of reality of modern man and to resolve contradictions.

In the field of tension between the Christian ethics of the individual and the preservation of a state system, relativism can be rejected as a logical error with the definition accuracy of Thomas Aquinas. The statement „There is no objective truth“ logically cancels itself, that it is itself formulated as objective truth, where truth is a semantic term.

@JKraschl , @WhiteHouse ,@PressSec , @BishopBarron

[Richard Josef Schindler @MathRJSchindler]

Part XXVIII.2 Joseph and his brothers

This biblical narrative is a primeval myth of migration, identity change and reconciliation. They are not merely linear narratives but a chain of three system transformations, in which the variables family, knowledge transfer and state power shift gradually.

1. The algebraic model of the extended family according to Jakob

The family origin system (the primordial extended family) functioned as a highly optimized economic and pedagogical network. The distribution of resources, time and knowledge was unequal, but functionally equalized:

The physical conservation subsystem: The ten older sons formed the basal labor force. They ensured the material survival of the entire system through field work and cattle breeding.

The intellectual innovation subsystem: Through the exemption of the older sons, temporal freedom (surplus of resources) was created in the aged patriarch Jacob. He used this exclusively for the intensive education of the late-born: Joseph and Benjamin.

Knowledge Economics: Joseph was specifically trained outside the physical production process for writing, abstraction and preservation of strategic knowledge.

2. The circumvention of primogeniture as system flexibility

The succession model of this structure breaks with the rigid, linear dynamics of feudal systems (primogeniture):

Criticism of the dynastic succession: It is not the biologically firstborn (Ruben) who receives the highest privilege, but Joseph (the firstborn of the chosen favorite woman Rahel). The purely biological sequence is replaced by a qualitative, spiritual selection.

Integration of marginal variables: The sons of the maids (Bilha and Silpa) also receive fixed, legally anchored places in the overall system of the twelve tribes.

The choice of the protection factor (Juda): The Messianic inheritance ultimately falls neither to the thinker Joseph nor to the firstborn, but to the fourth son, Judah. This qualifies himself systemically through his protective function (his guarantee for Benjamin). He becomes the direct ancestor of Joseph (husband of Mary) and thus Jesus. The system rewards the ability of collective security, not the biological privilege of the firstborn.

3. The fate of envy and the protection code of the commandments

The original catastrophe of separation (the throw into the well) shows the existential risk of closed systems:

Envy as a destroyer of freedom: The collective envy of the ten working brothers on the exempted thinker Joseph destroys his individual freedom. It acts as a destructive energy that blows up the family system.

The protective algorithm of the Ten Commandments: The Mosaic law (especially the prohibition of desire and envy) is a functional code in terms of knowledge history to contain this anthropological destructiveness. It serves to protect the family space in order to be able to permanently stabilize cooperation and freedom in the first place.

4. The migration dilemma: knowledge tear and system collapse

If this functional model of the family is broken up by uncontrolled migration processes, there is a threat of a loss of civilizational knowledge, which is often overlooked in modern discourse:

The fourth commandment as an efficiency code: The call „Honor Father and Mother“ ensures the vertical transmission of information. If the next generation uses and stores the accumulated, social and strategic knowledge of the elderly, the system saves valuable resources. The next generation does not have to reinvent the wheel and is free for more complex, evolutionary tasks.

The structural break of the present: Modern migration movements separate these generational chains spatially and culturally. The highly specialized social knowledge of the older generations, which has been translated over centuries, evaporates in the country of origin, as it can no longer be operationalized in the hyper-technized, bureaucratic environment of the country of arrival.
@JKraschl , @PressSec

[Richard Josef Schindler @MathRJSchindler]

Part XXVIII.1 Happy name day!

It is more important than the birthday, if you remember the birth of Jesus, which according to Margot Käßmann (former EKD council chairman is no right in Germany, then probably a grace to be a German) As a native of Salzburg, you are Mr. Domimikus J Kraschl a German like Wolfgang Amadeus and not an Austrian. I remember the castle on the Salzach, the Café Glockenspiel, where we were allowed to wrap our four-month-old firstborn in the back guest room, because in May 1984 there was not much going on in Salzburg.

As a student, you should listen and not ask that disturbs the learning progress at school, said Ludwig Wittgenstein.

Because of TBC, I can’t hear acoustically and listening is boring. As you know, thinking, thinking yourself and thinking nonsense does not fulfill the concept of work according to physics. Only writing is then work. So I argued sensibly with Google’s AI yesterday . But 80 pages is too long. (profound irony)

In the Obertertia I had Catholic religion. Two years of history and then three years of what others had thought like Hans Küng and Teilhard de Chardin. But now I bought a book about Thomas Aquinas. I saw too much of Vienna in May 2023. So to present me a beer with Joseph Null komma Null from Ottakring at the Servitenwirt at the Wiener Servitenkirche in the 9th District that’s enough. Nomen is omen . Wiener like to make jokes about others. As a Piefke with roots from Upper Silesia I also like to make jokes about Wiener. I prefer the Viennese singer’s singer Joseph, who cut his foreman’s braid. His birthday composite „Das Kaiserquartett“ is actually out of place in Berlin. His farewell symphony is an exaggeration against only work, for family and family cohesion and for Catholic holidays so on to the canton of Zug! You work to live.

Thinking is not physical work from force and path direction, whereby the amounts of force and path in the direction should coincide according to classical physics since Sir Isaac Newton, as the workforce in the construction of a pyramid or when energy is converted into work today.

If it is argued on an abstract moral level, the problem of the Buridan donkey appears under Part XXIII

Mt 7, 1-2 and Magnifica Humanitas @Pontifex

The moral law Mt 7, 1-2 „Do not judge, that you will not be judged! For as you judge, so you will be judged...“) is one universal logical postulate of the Jewish-Christian tradition

If a society today condemns migration across the board, different moral standards are applied to the ancestors than in the past and breaks the axiom of equality, it seems morally illegitimate. Since a logical consistency in the political discussion is difficult to bear, debates take refuge in what John Locke has described as unreasonable argumentation: prejudices and blinders.

Instead of analyzing the structural problem, the argumentum ad hominem attack is chosen:

Explanations in Part XXVIII.2-4

@DrKissler, @Steinhoefel , @JKraschl , @cducsubt , @BverfG, @BGH_Bund ,@davidmcallister , @ManfredWeber , @latinopoulou , @EP_President , @WhiteHouse, @PressSec , @MargoMartin47, @SpeakerJohnson @kayleighmcenany , @BishopBarron , @KardinalWien , @KardMueller , @netanyahu ,@DrEliDavid

[Richard Josef Schindler @MathRJSchindler]

Part XXVII
I have to check with the person Janosch Dahmen first. When I use Nomen est Omen, I draw a linguistic reference to Janosch (Horst Eckert born in 1931 as a Catholic from Upper Silesia) the little tiger and the little bear in „o how beautiful is Panama“.

Those who have values, a mission statement, can decide quickly.

The principles of morality are built on reason and feeling. That with the surrogacy of Jens Spahn can be measured according to Mt 7, 1-2 especially from his education and life path.

Then Joseph Ratzinger may be a thought-up with his definition of relativism. A measure comes from measuring. Their standard seems to be exaggerated for highly gifted intellectual language users of a „awful German language“, for which it takes at least thirty years to learn these languages in their „errors, tribominations“ according to „Sufferings of a young W...“. This source as a US American said it with sharp humor, who has a mission statement never lies, because he always derives identical statements from the prerequisites with deduction according to the basic principles of identity thinking.

What shows the advantage of a simple language if you don’t just want to be understood by world readers in Germany? Inobjectivity against people is the „sanctified“ principle of the pillory of politics in the Mainz carnival?

Please perform there, because among the blind, the one-seed like the ZDF is king?

What about the „Westphalian Peace“, Mt 7 3-5?

Appealing to „prejudice and pride“ is a cheap trick in communication, is it unfair according to Article 5 (2) of the Basic Law @Ralf_Hoecker?

Not to form your own opinion! Anyness according to the postulate of Friedrich A Hayek leads where?

Then you have to agree as a Catholic after the cultural struggle of Bismarck of 1871-1878 to the slavery of Great Prussia with his three world wars caused by Prussia, from the European ones in the 19th Century after the „cemetery“ of the Vienna Congress, not to mention the trigger was the First World War of the 18th Century.

It should have gone differently if Heinrich Heine was understood in the 19th Century in Germany.

This is how one makes „mistakes and the error of the past life“ according to Count Leo N Tolstoy becomes clear in the Now in the Today! (personal Modus ponens). If you read and think for yourself like Buridan’s donkey, „If I think of Germany at night, I’m sleep deprived“ HH like Bumblebee Bumblebee (German „Hummel, Hummel“!)

A contradiction to practical knowledge after the birth of quantum mechanics?

„A bumblebee cannot fly physically, but it still flies!“ This phenomenon is called the bumblebee paradox. It is based on a myth from the 1930s, according to the rigid rules of aerodynamics (like airplanes) the insects are too heavy for their small wings. In fact, bumblebees fly successfully through special circular movements and small air vortices, which generate enormous buoyancy.

The secrets of the bumblebee flight

The supposedly unsolvable flight task is mastered by bumblees with a fascinating flight technique:

• High number of wings: Bumblebees beat their wings up to 200 times per second.

• Elastic joints: The wings consist of a flexible protein called resilin, which allows the wings to bend.

• Swirl generation: This construction creates small air vortices on the wing edges, which act like small mini tornadoes and keep the bumblebees in the air.

Mt 7, 1-2 and Magnifica Humanitas @Pontifex

@DrKissler, @Steinhoefel , @JKraschl , @cducsubt , @BverfG, @BGH_Bund ,@davidmcallister , @ManfredWeber , @latinopoulou , @EP_President , @WhiteHouse, @PressSec , @MargoMartin47, @SpeakerJohnson @kayleighmcenany , @BishopBarron , @KardinalWien , @KardMueller , @netanyahu ,@DrEliDavid

[Richard Josef Schindler @MathRJSchindler]

In der Diskussion sind drei Kategorien zu trennen. Ab wann beginnt menschlichen Leben. Beim Standpunkt mit der Zeugung in der Gebärmutter einer Frau. Dann ist es ein Handel mit Menschen. Zweitens, was ist das Ziel einer Familie im Gegensatz zu einen Ehe. Wenn der Begriff Ehe verallgemeinert wird als Lebenspartnerschaft stellen sich Fragen, warum darf ein Statt dieese auch finanziell schützen durch den Vortell des Ehegattensplitting? Das ist keine Gleichbehandlung z. B. zu einer katholische Ehe zwischen Mann und Frau und es gilt in Deutschland Artikel 19 Abs. 2 die Wesentlichkeitsgarantie der Grundrechte. Ich kritisiere die deutschen Bischöfe als Hirten als Schützer gemeinsamer katholischer Werte einer religiöser Anschauungen. Wird aus eine Gleichtbehandlung von Minderheiten dann Unrecht gegenüber einer Mehrheit katholischer Ehen? Ursache ist man vertritt von seiten der Katholischen Bischöfe in Deutschland kein Werte weil man auch abhängig ist von der Finanzierung durch den Staat. Wie nannte Joseph Ratzinger es? Man hörte seine Worte verstand sie nicht? Und die dritte entscheidende Frage ist am Beispiel von Jens Spahn warum will ein Poliktiker, der keine Zeit findet eingehend für einem Kind zu sorgen und es erziehen kann und auch dessen Lebenspartner nicht ein Kind? Nach Mt 7 1-2 darf und muss man einen Politiker danach fragen, wo für steht dieser Politikrr in seinem Welt- und Menschenbild und dazu gehört auch dessen Vermögensentwichlung und finanzielles Gebaren . Wer beansprucht Schutz vor Angriffen seiner persönlichen Ehre aus seiner Funktion als Politiker und Mitglied des Deutschen Bundestag durch eine Anwaltschaft des Staates zu haben, hat die Kontradiktion auch zu erfüllen, transparent in seiner Privatsphäre zu sein. Ich darf unterstellen, diese Selbstreflexion ist in seinem Rücktrittsschreiben nicht enthalten, sondern allein eine Ich- bezogene Antwort eines maßgeblichen Entscheider bei der politischen Willensbildung wie bei den Coronamassnahmen. Die Parteien müssen gemäß Grundgesetz diese Willensbildung organisieren. Das ist eine systemische Frage nach dem Prinzip des mathematischen Widerspruchsbeweis, weil verschiedene Kategorie verbunden sind.
@DrKissler , @ulfposh , @BVerfG , @cducsubt , @KardMueller , @SHomburg , @FritzVahrenholt , @HansWernerSinn , @davidmcallister , @ManfredWeber , @EP_President , @WhiteHouse , @PressSec , @MargoMartin47 , @SpeakerJohnson , @BishopBarron

[Richard Josef Schindler @MathRJSchindler]

X ~ Y = Z <—> (X •Y) + X = Z ich bin Algebraiker und denke in Strukturen als Analytiker

@DrKissler ,@ulfposh ,@BVerfG , @BGH_Bund ,@GiorgiaMeloni ,@latinopoulou ,@NawrockiKn @WhiteHouse ,@PressSec
@MargoMartin47 ,@JKraschl ,@BishopBarron ,@netanyahu @KardMueller @VivekGRamaswamy

[Richard Josef Schindler @MathRJSchindler]

The logical-algebraic text

The Illustration of the Spirit: Christianity as a confessional subgroup of Judaism in the mirror of Wittgenstein's algebra

The historical structure of religions can be described as a family of algebraic structures whose transformations follow mathematical laws of symmetry. Ludwig Wittgenstein is used here as the greatest algebraic in intellectual history: he has recognized that systems do not operate via substantial entities, but via the linking rules of their linguistic elements - via the concept of meaning within defined groups.

I. The algebraic matrix of divisions

In this model, primitive Judaism forms the mathematical superset $J$. The emergence of Christianity is not an external creation, but a genuine split of faith, therefore the formation of an internal subgroup $U_C \subset J$.

Using Wittgenstein's concept of structure, the historical development of the West can be presented as a progressive fractionation of this matrix. The denominational final states are consequently formalized as Catholic Jews and Protestant Jews. This algebraic notation breaks up the historical symmetry: it forces the observer to the rational insight that the evolutionary line of the Christian denominations remains invariantly bound to their original Jewish matrix. The separation of the Western Roman Patriarchate from the East Byzantine Patriarchate represents in this coordinate system a classical orthogonal transformation of the common space of origin, a topological shift that Joseph Ratzinger also recognized in his structural theory of the Church.

{Superset: Judaism (J) } ~ (Jesus of Nazareth) := {Subgroup: Christianity (U_C) } = { Eastern Roman Patriarchate (Byzante)} ˋ+´

{West Roman Patriarchate (Rome)} ˋ:´ (splitting of faith)

= : { "Catholic Jews"} ˋ+´ { "Protestant Jews" }

II. The dualism of truth concepts according to Wittgenstein

At this point, the genius of Ludwig Wittgenstein unfolds, who mathematically isolates the dynamics between two conflicting systems:

1 The materialistic worldview of physics: It operates as a closed system in which "sense" is strictly defined as the representation of empirical facts in space. For this group, metaphysical truth is an element outside the definition range.

2 The religious truth of the Catholic Church: It constitutes an independent system with inverse linking rules. Here the meaning is generated by the transcendent orientation and the performative life form.

Wittgenstein resolves the apparent contradiction by showing that both systems can coexist as mathematical groups as long as their grammar is not mixed. Philosophy of religion becomes a pure structural doctrine for him.

III. The structural change under Eugenio Pacelli

In this mathematical series fits the term of office of Eugenio Pacelli (Pius XII) as a decisive operator.

For centuries, the Catholic group was blocked by a rigid, anti-Judaist axiom, which essentially went back to the replacement theory since Augustine of Hippo. Pacelli radically modified the internal linking rules of this group.

Through his encyclical Mystici Corporis and the redefinition of the relationship with Judaism, he initiated a structural transformation. He shifted the coordinates away from exclusion to a recognition of common symmetry. The Jews were thus formally defined mathematically as the irreplaceable "spiritual ancestors" - as the fundamental axiom system of Catholicism. In his analytical conversations with Peter Seewald, Joseph Ratzinger confirmed Pacelli's structural achievement by identifying him as the one who created the logical prerequisites for the Second Vatican Council.

[Richard Josef Schindler @MathRJSchindler]

Part XXVI Without the long version of my discussion by reason with the Google AI few maybe understand my shortened text.

The use of terms such as „Catholic Jews“ and „Protestant Jews“ is permissible as an algebraic-stylistic tool to ironically reveal the intra-Jewish divisional history of Christianity.

Joseph Ratzinger himself emphasized in his books of conversation with Peter Seewald (like Light of the World or Salt of the Earth) that the Jews are the „older brothers“ of Christianity. The coinage of terms continues this thought historically and mathematically.

The following factual argumentation text pays tribute to the theological development and is a structured reference to Eugenio Pacellis (Pius XII) in the sense of Ratzinger

The Historical Matrix: From Jewish Christianity to Division

• The Jewish root: Christianity began as a Jewish renewal movement of Jewish Christians. From the point of view of a mathematical-historical structural doctrine (algebra of learning), the first Christians remained ethnically, culturally and spiritually Jewish.

• The geographical division: Christianity was divided primarily along imperial lines into the Patriarchate of the West (Rome) and the Patriarchate of the East (Byzantus). Joseph Ratzinger has always recognized this historical symmetry in order to establish ecumenism with Orthodoxy.

• The fractionation of the West: The Reformation divided the Western patriarchy into Protestants and Catholics. Since both currents bear the Old Testament and the Jewish Messiah belief as a foundation, an irony (“Catholic and Protestant Jews”) makes the indissoluble line of origin visible. It deconstructs the later, absurd anti-Judaism.

The role of Eugenio Pacelli (Pius XII) and the break-up of anti-Judaism

• The theological turn: Traditional anti-Judaism, which has shaped the church since Augustine of Hippo (the theory of substitution or substitution, according to which the church had completely replaced the old Israel), experienced a fundamental shock under Eugenio Pacelli.

• Mystici Corporis (1943): In this encyclical, Pacelli redefined the church as the mystical body of Christ and thus laid the foundation for a new understanding of the people of God, which no longer simply denied the Jewish roots.

• The rescue operations: Pacelli acted heavily in secret during the Second World War. Jewish scholars such as Pincha’s Lapide pointed out that hundreds of thousands of Jewish lives were saved by Pacelli’s direct and indirect intervention (including the opening of monasteries in Rome as places of refuge).

The recognition by Joseph Ratzinger

• The defense of the truth: In his interviews with Peter Seewald, Ratzinger (Benedict XVI.) defended Eugenio Pacelli vehemently opposes the modern, often one-sided criticism of mere „silence“.

• The rational calculation: Ratzinger explained that Pacelli was not silent out of indifference, but because a loud, public protest had demonstrably drastically worsened the repressions of the National Socialists against Jews and baptized Jews in occupied Europe (as the example in the Netherlands after the pastoral letter of the bishops showed). Pacelli chose the path of silent, pragmatic salvation instead of ineffective rhetoric.

• Pioneer of Nostra Aetate: Ratzinger recognized Pacelli as the indispensable theological architect, without whose preliminary work the historical reconciliation with the Jews at the Second Vatican Council (Nostra Aetate) would not have been possible.

Mt 7, 1-2, Mt 10, 34 and Magnifica Humanitas @pontifex

@drKissler, @ulfposh , @BVerfg, @cducsubt , @davidmcallister , @ManfredWeber , @EP_President , @JKraschl , @GiorgiaMeloni , @latinopoulou , @NawrockiKn , @WhiteHouse
@PressSec , @VP, @SpeakerJohnson , @MargoMartin47 , @mfleischhacker1 , @kayleighmcenany , @KardMueller, @BishopBarron , @SHomburg, @HansWernerSinn @netanyahu

[Richard Josef Schindler @MathRJSchindler]

Ich verstehe die Katholische Kirche nicht. Das ist seit 2010 veröffentlicht im Herder Verlag
„Benedikt XVI. Licht der Welt“ ein Gespräch mit Peter Seewald. Warum beschäftigt man sich in Deutschland mit dem synodalen Weg und nicht mit der Befriedung um Israel?
@DrKissler , @ulfposh ,@cducsubt ,@WhiteHouse ,@PressSec ,@JKraschl ,@KardMueller ,@BishopBarron ,@MargoMartin47 ,@TaylorRogers47 ,@mfleischhacker1 ,@KoeppelRoger ,@netanyahu ,@DrEliDavid

[Richard Josef Schindler @MathRJSchindler]

Albert Einstein hatte gesagt man solle dich entscheiden wo man persönlich seinen Schwepunkt sein. Politik sein nicht erfolgversprechende zu sein aber das stellt sich erst später heraus. Momentan wichtig ist gegen die Einschränkungen der Persönlichen Freiheiten vorzugehen. Wer kann lebt nicht nur in Europa das sind aber privilegierte