Chris Matienzo @matienzox - Twitter Profile

almost 3 years ago

Future of Logistics Einride, a lesser known name perhaps. Is building the future of logistics. While keeping humans-in-the-loop. 🧵 A thread

LinusEkenstam's tweet photo. Future of Logistics

Einride, a lesser known name perhaps. Is building the future of logistics.

While keeping humans-in-the-loop.

🧵 A thread https://t.co/kUi5KikL8T

18

737

69

382

465K

matienzox retweeted

Anu Aakash @anuaakash

almost 3 years ago

Dalle3 + Runway Two Steps: 1) Image: Dalle3 on ChatGPT Prompt: wide image, 5 shirts hanging on a clothes line with one letter written on each "h" "e" "l" "l" "o" 2) Image to Video: Runway Image + General Motion 1 only, no text prompt

40

1K

170

1K

393K

matienzox retweeted

titus

@TitusTeatus

almost 3 years ago

the power of AI made this in 4 minutes with krea

77

1K

134

466

141K

Chris Matienzo @matienzox

about 3 years ago

@izaroo_garciaa Sí 🥲

0

1

0

60

Who to follow

Experienced Software Engineer but having kid like curiosity to explore and understand technology, culture, places and people. He/Him.

Joan Farré

@JoanFarre87

Arquitecto. Somos lo que hacemos, y aquí, lo que decimos.

matienzox retweeted

OpenAI

@OpenAI

about 3 years ago

DALL·E 3🤝ChatGPT

483

24K

4K

2K

3M

matienzox retweeted

Physics In History

@PhysInHistory

about 3 years ago

The double slit experiment was first performed by Thomas Young in 1801, as a demonstration of the wave nature of light. He used a coherent light source, such as sunlight or a candle, and passed it through a narrow slit in a card. Then he placed another card with two parallel slits close to the first one, and observed the light pattern on a screen behind the second card. He expected to see two bright spots on the screen, corresponding to the two slits, but instead he saw a series of bright and dark fringes, called an interference pattern. This meant that the light waves passing through the two slits interfered with each other, creating regions of constructive and destructive interference. This was evidence that light was not made of particles, as Isaac Newton had proposed, but of waves, as Christiaan Huygens had suggested. However, with the development of quantum mechanics in the early 20th century, it was discovered that light could also behave like particles, called photons. In 1905, Albert Einstein explained the photoelectric effect by assuming that light was composed of discrete packets of energy that could knock electrons out of metals. In 1924, Louis de Broglie proposed that matter could also have wave properties, and derived a relation between the wavelength and momentum of any particle. In 1927, Clinton Davisson and Lester Germer, and independently George Thomson and Alexander Reid, confirmed this hypothesis by showing that electrons could produce interference patterns when scattered by crystals. Later, it was shown that atoms and molecules could also exhibit wave-particle duality. The double slit experiment was then repeated with single photons or electrons, one at a time. Surprisingly, even when only one particle was sent through the slits at a time, an interference pattern still emerged on the screen after many repetitions. This meant that each particle somehow interfered with itself, as if it went through both slits at once. However, if detectors were placed at the slits to observe which slit each particle passed through, the interference pattern disappeared. This showed that the act of measurement affected the outcome of the experiment, and that the particle's behavior depended on whether it was observed or not. This phenomenon is known as quantum superposition and collapse, and it implies that quantum systems exist in a state of uncertainty until they are measured. The experiment has profound implications for our understanding of reality and the nature of observation. It challenges our classical intuition and forces us to accept that reality is not deterministic but probabilistic at the quantum level.

PhysInHistory's tweet photo. The double slit experiment was first performed by Thomas Young in 1801, as a demonstration of the wave nature of light. He used a coherent light source, such as sunlight or a candle, and passed it through a narrow slit in a card. Then he placed another card with two parallel slits close to the first one, and observed the light pattern on a screen behind the second card. He expected to see two bright spots on the screen, corresponding to the two slits, but instead he saw a series of bright and dark fringes, called an interference pattern. This meant that the light waves passing through the two slits interfered with each other, creating regions of constructive and destructive interference. This was evidence that light was not made of particles, as Isaac Newton had proposed, but of waves, as Christiaan Huygens had suggested.

However, with the development of quantum mechanics in the early 20th century, it was discovered that light could also behave like particles, called photons. In 1905, Albert Einstein explained the photoelectric effect by assuming that light was composed of discrete packets of energy that could knock electrons out of metals. In 1924, Louis de Broglie proposed that matter could also have wave properties, and derived a relation between the wavelength and momentum of any particle. In 1927, Clinton Davisson and Lester Germer, and independently George Thomson and Alexander Reid, confirmed this hypothesis by showing that electrons could produce interference patterns when scattered by crystals. Later, it was shown that atoms and molecules could also exhibit wave-particle duality.

The double slit experiment was then repeated with single photons or electrons, one at a time. Surprisingly, even when only one particle was sent through the slits at a time, an interference pattern still emerged on the screen after many repetitions. This meant that each particle somehow interfered with itself, as if it went through both slits at once. However, if detectors were placed at the slits to observe which slit each particle passed through, the interference pattern disappeared. This showed that the act of measurement affected the outcome of the experiment, and that the particle's behavior depended on whether it was observed or not. This phenomenon is known as quantum superposition and collapse, and it implies that quantum systems exist in a state of uncertainty until they are measured.

The experiment has profound implications for our understanding of reality and the nature of observation. It challenges our classical intuition and forces us to accept that reality is not deterministic but probabilistic at the quantum level.

48

3K

577

523

303K

Chris Matienzo @matienzox

over 3 years ago

@ModestMitkus 👋

0

52

Chris Matienzo @matienzox

over 3 years ago

@ModestMitkus 👋

0

7

Chris Matienzo @matienzox

over 3 years ago

@ModestMitkus @NotionHQ 👋

0

9

Chris Matienzo @matienzox

over 3 years ago

No me sorprendería que pronto alguien publicara un libro escrito íntegramente por ChatGPT-3. La cuestión sería: ¿de qué temática?

0

1

0

52

matienzox retweeted

Tivadar Danka

@TivadarDanka

over 3 years ago

The single most undervalued fact of linear algebra: matrices are graphs, and graphs are matrices. Encoding matrices as graphs is a cheat code, making complex behavior simple to study. Let me show you how!