@Keir_Starmer You couldn't harness a donkey - but you'll cheerfully throw tens of thousands of creatives under the bus for money, you disingenuous little twerp.
@Charlie51185603 @TimothyBalding@implausibleblog Then that's where we will always disagree. Tech firms are literally complaining they can't operate without free access to copyrighted works. Even Netflix and Spotify pay for that - and the artist really does have a choice about whether or not they want to be involved.
@Charlie51185603 @TimothyBalding@implausibleblog Cards on the table: if every working model was scrapped and rebuilt, from the ground up, with work from artists who deliberately opted in (and who were paid for their contributions), I’d be mostly okay with that. That won’t happen, though - because it’s just too expensive.
@CalumAWatt @ruslana_rv That's the thing - most of these people just don't see it impacting them.
"I'm a plumber/plasterer/delivery driver - AI won't affect me."
What do they think we're going to be retraining as? Astronauts? We'll either be taking their jobs, or driving pay down. They'll care then.
@RhonddaBryant
Chris, this is absolutely not a “win win” - it should be opt-in, not opt-out. The less said about letting them get away with having stolen our work to get this far, the better.
UK proposes letting tech firms use copyrighted work to train AI https://t.co/N294QCuft2
@stephaniem0805@CarolineMack18@CarolineLucas@euromove As of two days ago, I can no longer sell my books or art in the EU without a dedicated EU representative - something that just isn’t viable for most one-man bands.
These people are thicker than custard.