anyway one thing we can keep doing is actively trying to build the world we want, with each other and for each other. that option is never gone, the roadblocks just shift. your community is the same one you woke up with yesterday
We are called to vote, even if we don't like the candidates. As per the Catechism of the Catholic Church, it is "morally obligatory to pay taxes, to exercise the right to vote, and to defend one's country" (CCC 2239-2240).
"As Catholics we are not single-issue voters. A candidate’s position on a single issue is not sufficient to guarantee a voter’s support" ("Forming Consciences for Faithful Citizenship").
Candidates may be *disqualified* if their platform "promotes an intrinsically evil act". Both major candidates promote intrinsically evil acts as defined by the USCCB, so "one must choose the lesser of two evils", as stated by Pope Francis (https://t.co/fFUzqcB8he).
When asked about them, Pope Francis responded: "I have never understood the expression 'non-negotiable values.' Values are values, and that is it. I can’t say that, of the fingers of a hand, there is one less useful than the rest" (https://t.co/2UEnNYaEYL).
There is no such thing as a "non-negotiable" value. While organizations like EWTN and Catholic Answers may promote these, they are not rooted in truth.
Catholic friends, here is a great rundown of how each major Presidential candidate's views align with Catholic teaching, along with references - it goes point-by-point through Part II of the USCCB's "Forming Consciences for Faithful Citizenship":
https://t.co/5APZe7EOg8
While I'm unaware of any similar comparison for other offices, you can use the same principles covered in "Forming Consciences for Faithful Citizenship" when looking at any candidate.
Some other notes that are not covered on that site: