@baradhili @GongGasGirl @maffygirl@hdavidrosen The carbon footprint of methoxyflurane is actually quite low. It’s infinitely better than N2O in that regard. But occupational exposure may well be a significant “thing”
@baradhili @GongGasGirl @maffygirl@hdavidrosen Supposedly…
Plus when you want to stop the effect the implication is that you breathe in around (but not through) the whistle and exhale out through the carbon…
I suspect successful compliance is south of 1%…
@maffygirl@baradhili@hdavidrosen @GongGasGirl Conveniently for the supplier I suspect that aspect of occupational safety has been put into the “we can address it if they ask the questions later” box.
There’s a charcoal capture aspect to the device but we know that won’t fix the exhalation of volatile taken up.
@baradhili@hdavidrosen ⬆️this! Methoxy has many ideal properties for short inhalational analgesia and brevity sorts out renal issues… but staff chronic exposure in the back of an ambulance… not well managed IMHO. @maffygirl @GongGasGirl (thoughts?)
@munrorobertson@DrNavSidhu @GongGasGirl Can’t recall if it’s this one or fospropofol but IIRC it doesn’t play nicely w LMAs. Like the old days of arguing w the gag and cough w Thio.
@BlindSideNZ64@fizzanddumpling “Some people” is an anecdote. Divided over the whole population they’re affecting you less than quarter of half a sip of your morning coffee and many have good reasons for it.
Pick a decent reason to be outraged.