Max Naegeler Roecker

computers & stuff

[trav @techsavvytravvy]

ohhhh i get it now, so Al writes all the code and i shouldn't care to look at it because the code passes a set of very strict constraints that Al also wrote. makes sense.

[shaurya @shauseth]

do you think genghis khan had a dashboard to give him operational insights

[Max Naegeler Roecker @maxrkr]

@caa1oo Começou a mais nova tendência na importação de pauta gringa: o direito dos feios. Engraçado é que ngm quer ter lugar de fala nesse caso

[Max Naegeler Roecker @maxrkr]

@CoxinhaEGuarana @duArte_pedroa @hunkyhunter69 Agora tu aplicou um refutality no gay

[deminho @demoestlamour]

Homem branco rico em cima de prédio reclama que novos prédios de pobre vão tapar a sua vista, entenda:

[Max Naegeler Roecker @maxrkr]

Imagina o que os três malucos da "Zé Be Leo" não iriam inventar se tivessem acesso a IA de hoje.

[zakk @hexednobility]

Excellent software takes time.

It requires smart people to care deeply about the product and to obsess over the details. To debate passionately about the details big and small. To spend time deeply thinking.

Nothing about this has changed.

[Dmitrii Kovanikov @ChShersh]

Being in SWE long enough is just constantly seeing people rediscover the same stuff over and over again

[dax @thdxr]

please i'm begging you show me something you built

not another "this is my custom agent setup" post where you pretend you're doing something smarter than vanilla claude code

please

[John Crickett @johncrickett]

He asks the wrong questions:

It shouldn't be "How are you supposed to review 5k lines of code every day?"

Instead: Are the 5k lines of code per day valuable? If they're not, the question of review is moot.

It shouldn't be: "Why people that now protest against AI were not horrified by the state of software in the last decade?"

Instead: Why as an "engineering" field are we happy to accept innovation making the quality of software steadily decrease decade after decade?

[Ryan Fleury @rfleury]

I do not understand defenders of status quo philosophies in software development. Even if you don’t think software quality has deteriorated at all in the past several decades (in some ways it hasn’t, but in numerous ways it objectively has), you have to lack all imagination or analytical abilities to consider modern software as the pinnacle of what could be produced.

Software can be much better than it is. I’m not interested in your methodologies which have led to many decades of slop (both pre- and post-LLM). I’m not interested in producing status quo results, even if it’s faster than it used to be. I care about what I make.

[Anthony Alaribe {···} @tonialaribe]

Unfortunately we now get made fun of, for actually writing or reading code.

[Ryan Fleury @rfleury]

“Past a certain age, a man who still writes getters and setters can be a bad thing”

[1eozim @1eozinho01]

A mãe dela devia ter pensado sobre antes de entrar no mundo do crime

[Mitchell Hashimoto @mitchellh]

@poojabnf I read the code

[Max Naegeler Roecker @maxrkr]

@Ramon4lan Ela querer.

[Nikita Bier @nikitabier]

In a 3% experiment, removing the Top-30 highest paid revenue share accounts from the For You timeline increased both time spent and daily active users on X.

[ThePrimeagen @ThePrimeagen]

I must say using AI to make refactors is very fun.

Refactorbation has never been more convenient