@Michaelwh24 There is a point to sticking to the rules. We'll get screwed. If your argument is Leicester then thats a very different case. They got away with a lot initially because they got promoted. The rules have since been changed to prevent that
@fabriziostinko1 EFL can go after the club and they've done that. FA can go after him and everyone personally involved and they've already started their investigation into it so will likely have bans in English football or worldwide for a year or so
@TheIrateRobin@RalphInUEFA Well its not because it was an EFL Cup game. Should've really been kicked out since others have been in EFL Cup competition for similar breaches
@RalphInUEFA It’s definitely a bigger breach because it’s a deliberate breach. They actively did it multiple times while knowing it was against the rules. If it has no impact on the match then why do it?
@RalphInUEFA I’d say they should’ve kicked them out too but i also think spying is a much more serious breach. There’s a more recent example of teams being kicked out.
@_ChrisLepkowski I’m assuming so less security to pay for. It is as reported here when that game started that turnout was low which wasn’t the case at all. People just couldn’t get in for kick off. Was even worse getting home after when there were no Ubers allowed nearby, no public
@_ChrisLepkowski@MarkRollas41903 They're still very lucrative, but you've gotta have the right spots and competition for those spots is fierce. Rents at parks in birmingham are around £20k a year but the weather has been poor the last few years