Mbalasoft

I want to read comments and apparently this is the only way.

[Mbalasoft @mbalasoft]

@beaversfilm Here it is! https://t.co/Ze1oNsOFGl

[Mbalasoft @mbalasoft]

@beaversfilm Just returned from the theatre and I am blown away. I cannot sleep so I am gonna record a movie review even though I never do that, because I have to share this experience! Please, if you at all can, GO SEE HUNDREDS OF BEAVERS!

[Mbalasoft @mbalasoft]

@MarcKnoedler @H0H0v People who include -1 are smartasses and I want nothing to do with them.

[Mbalasoft @mbalasoft]

@adamj2048 @SciManDan The problem is not just perspective, the wide angle lens do create a spherical distortion in the lower picture, which if I was a flat earther would be a red flag “they are making flat things look round”, because that is totally what that kind of lens does.

[Mbalasoft @mbalasoft]

@Math_World_ 33 and 88, about 5 seconds, clicked on the bubble icon to display list of existing answers.

[Mbalasoft @mbalasoft]

@pickover @howie_hua 3000001/4000000 should do it

[Mbalasoft @mbalasoft]

@csquaredEddy @awoooouwuooooo @fermatslibrary Even if the probability was 0, it would still be possible.

[Mbalasoft @mbalasoft]

@sonukg4india Look at the options provided. None of them look like something sane to 2050 power except 0 and 1. Two nonzeros will not make 0, so the answer is 1.

[Mbalasoft @mbalasoft]

@enuminous @Himansh82299779 @PhysInHistory I do not think we know that. Do we know that? It would be easy to be a transcendental number and meticulously avoid a single specific phone number.

[Mbalasoft @mbalasoft]

@3pupmomma @fermatslibrary I think there might be relatively few of them, as the number is between 10^n-1 and 10^(n-1)+1 and the sum is between n*9^n and 0. So the number will very quickly get much larger than what the sum can possibly reach.

[Mbalasoft @mbalasoft]

@pickover Some people cannot count, some people cannot math, and some people are smartasses.

[Mbalasoft @mbalasoft]

@ZahlenRMD x^5 and y^7 both go to minus infinity and are continuous, so there will always be an arbitrarily low negative solution so x+y goes to minus infinity.

[Mbalasoft @mbalasoft]

@H0H0v I look at it and think “is gonna be something simple, what is the smallest interesting square root … that would be 4” thus x=3

[Mbalasoft @mbalasoft]

@ZetaOf1 @selcukorkmaz Or is it? Can you distinguish places where variable is assigned from named function arguments so that a simple regex tells you? Not in Python you can’t, in R you at least have a shot if you write idiomatically.

[Mbalasoft @mbalasoft]

@SuperHumanEpoch @skdh I do not think it is consensus, but there is always uncertainty about some knowledge and evidence removes some of that uncertainty. A lot of evidence - a lot of certainty, so a lot of agreement - higher likelihood to be correct.

[Mbalasoft @mbalasoft]

@skdh You need to read this published research: https://t.co/OO2YD4KWHF

[Mbalasoft @mbalasoft]

@rlmcelreath Oh.. I was reading the “… human … tasty” and thinking about practicality.

[Mbalasoft @mbalasoft]

@sandeep_indie @JordiSantamar1a Your experience with Indians would vary from absolute genius, extreme hard workers all the way down to entitled YouTube watchers with a fake degree and zero skill. Seen it all, good hiring process is absolutely essential.

[Mbalasoft @mbalasoft]

@BillvLee @NMedina5 @Trianglemancsd Sierpinsky triangle is a triangle like Dutch oven is an oven.

[Mbalasoft @mbalasoft]

@NMedina5 @Trianglemancsd From my graphics card programmer perspective, a triangle is a convex hull of three points, and this is not that.