JUDGMENT:
High Court Declares Sections of the Public Private Partnerships Act Unconstitutional
The High Court, on 17 September 2026, declared sections 59, 60 and 72(1) of the Public Private Partnerships (PPP) Act, 2021, unconstitutional following a petition filed by Katiba Institute. The Petition, filed in November 2024, was a response to the opacity and accountability deficits experienced in relation to the Adani-related JKIA and KETRACO PPP deals.
The Court agreed with Katiba Instituteโs argument that PPPs involve public expenditure and liabilities whose approval and oversight lies with Parliament. It, therefore, held that excluding parliament from the approval and oversight of PPP projects is unconstitutional.
Katiba Institute urges Parliament to take swift action to regularize the Act to ensure it complies with the Constitution as directed by the Court.
Read more via https://t.co/Qe73JJGOnO
.@hp_gichana .@NoraMbagathi
On Friday, 18 September 2026, I filed a Senate Notice of Motion under Standing Order 101(1) seeking to censure President William Samoei Ruto over a recurring practice of governing through oral and roadside declarations instead of constitutional, statutory and parliamentary processes.
The Motion centres on Article 135, which requires presidential decisions in the performance of constitutional functions to be in writing, sealed and signed. It argues that while the President may speak publicly, express opinions and announce policy intentions, such utterances cannot substitute for formal legal instruments where the Constitution or statute requires one.
It cites the 2 September 2026 declaration on foreign nationals in small-scale trade; the 3 September 2026 directive to Tata Chemicals Magadi to โpack up and leaveโ amid ongoing statutory and court processes; past statements on the Mumias Sugar litigation; the May 2025 Meru County debt pledge; unbudgeted health and development commitments; and pronouncements affecti
William Ruto's murderous regime looted Ksh 42 Billion through the ministry of Petroleum and Mining between December 2022 and June 2023.
Study the chart below slowly and carefully.
The budget had no fuel subsidies, but Ksh 42B was sneaked in and withdrawn.
To conceal the crime, the thugs sneaked in an unconstitutional supplementary budget to conceal the amount withdrawn fraudulently to subsidize unnamed Financial Private Enterprises.
Wewe endelea hapo kuimba Wantam Tutam and thugs are distracting you with noise and drama as they are robbing you of your future.
Hawa wapelekwe jela kesho!
@otienowill Who is the archetect of these funds and levies!? Because they have instutuonal framework on which they are anchored. Who slept on the job!? The system has failed we need a reset
@HonAdenDuale What do u as the government have at bomas that make it lucrative for u...
If u have numbers as u claim u dont have anything to fear u will win we can see from crowds in homabay
Tigania East Mp Mpuri Aburi finally gives in; says selling Tutam in Meru has become like selling pork in Saudi Arabia.
Guy has really tried for the last few months. Amechoka kuvumilia.
I finally understand why this govt keeps passing bills that any first-year law student can see will be struck down.
Ahmednasir has said it: cases are given to firms on condition that 70โ80% of the fees comes back as kickbacks to key govt officials.
So they design a flawed law knowingly.
It is challenged, they cash in.
They lose.
They appeal, they cash in.
Fees keep flowing.
The firms too have no incentive to win the cases.
The same officials who bungled the process allegedly get paid twice, once as salary, once as a kickback.
We thought they were reckless.
They are not reckless.
They are farming the courts.
Sad.