Mcdwm4

[Mcdwm4 @mcdwm4]

@RealBarabbas @piper4missouri Nah, what you’re referring to was about private Ed. existing, not attempting to bend public Ed. to serve religious goals. Protestants, however, gave us the scopes trial in 1925 & had been attacking Ed. for ~50yrs prior. The “P” in WASP is still a big part of American nationalism.

[Ashton Pittman @ashtonpittman]

Jason Aldean shot this at the site where a white lynch mob strung Henry Choate up at the Maury County Courthouse in Columbia, Tenn., after dragging his body through the streets with a car in 1927.

That's where Aldean chose to sing about murdering people who don't respect police.

[Michael Harriot @michaelharriot]

He might be telling the truth.

Let’s analyze the statement and the song:

A thread

[Shannon Watts @shannonrwatts]

Sen. Marsha Blackburn sent a letter to Anheuser-Busch demanding that the company end its relationship with transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney, and also threatened them with congressional oversight: https://t.co/1gydiYiy4r

[Mcdwm4 @mcdwm4]

@unnamedcactuar @Jason_Aldean Missouri, bud. Education & ethics exist outside the coasts. The song is about ignorance & violence from men with nothing else to offer —if you like it, we all know what your shortcomings are, & why you’re anxious about break-ins when the rest of us can leave the doors unlocked 🤷‍♀️

[Mcdwm4 @mcdwm4]

@CarolsCloset @Jason_Aldean His song & video make it clear that he’s referencing a sundown town, not a small town.

There is nothing “raised right” about men that threaten vigilantism, especially in this context.

Your location has little to do with your lack of civility or respect for the rule of law.

[Shannon Watts @shannonrwatts]

@Jason_Aldean Translation: Jason Aldean simply wants to return to a time in America when “good old boys” could shoot or beat the shit out of people who they didn’t think belonged in their town. Also, this song is two months old and now far past the legal song judgment period. Good day.

[Mcdwm4 @mcdwm4]

@TexasRose1836 @ChrisDJackson @KerryKennedyRFK There isn’t anything that backs the implication he was making. Cherry-picking data from an article is not “scientific proof”… look into predatory journals, the replication crisis, & issues with open-access, to start. Google can’t replace years of education & expertise 🤷‍♀️.

[Mueller, She Wrote @MuellerSheWrote]

The reason I wrote my op ed about this is because you can’t just GET leave granted. And what if you’ve been raped by one of the six people who have to approve your leave? I’d like it for people like @TomCottonAR to do some god damned research before they open their mouths.

[James Rogers III @jamesearl23]

@la_china_ao3 @zercag Thank you, you can share/support writers who are striking without pay to stop things like this for ever happening again!

https://t.co/cyqJm2hIQJ

[Ash ✌🏼it’s all happening @AshleyBK7]

Registering my daughter for high school soccer tryouts and I get to this lovely little bit. Why would the UHSAA need this information? What does this have to do with her playing soccer?? What the hell?

[Ricky Davila @TheRickyDavila]

Hey @Marriott,

It’s disgusting that you’re going to allow a Moms For Liberty summit to be hosted this weekend at your venue space in Philadelphia knowing they’re an extremist hate group who quoted Hitler and will have an Oath Keepers terrorist as a guest speaker. Shame on you.

[Jonathan Reiner @JReinerMD]

If Rogan wants to host 2 vaccine scientists to discuss the data then I’m all for it. But debating a vax denier who’s expertise is limited to a famous name just provides more oxygen to disinformation. @PeterHotez

[Molly Jong-Fast @MollyJongFast]

Hi @joerogan, why won’t you debate me? What are you afraid of? Are you worried about me puncturing your fear factor narrative?

[Seth Abramson @SethAbramson]

PS7/ Also this: while lawyers can frame facts/precedent differently—it’s key to our adversarial justice system—and scientists may have slightly different reads on how some data project forward, debating anything subject to the scientific method is lunacy. https://t.co/BeOO2TmzPH

[Seth Abramson @SethAbramson]

PS6/ If these men had friends rather than cultists, an intervention would’ve happened a long time ago. So my question has nothing to do with Hotez debating a crank, but whether Rogan and Musk *chose* to have no authentic friends or did it just happen? It affects how I judge them.

[Seth Abramson @SethAbramson]

5. Hotez owes Rogan, Musk, and RFK Jr. *nothing*. They haven’t earned anyone’s time/attention—let alone an expert’s time/attention—on the subject of vaccines. And Hotez owes Rogan’s audience nothing because it *wants* to be lied to about vaccines. RFK Jr. is doing that just fine.

[Mcdwm4 @mcdwm4]

@mikeamark @Mangy_Dog @mcuban Eh, no. They’re simply feeding you validation so that you engage, & they can collect/sell your data. The head of a fund isn’t paying $150k so that you can hear the “truth”.

[Mark Cuban @mcuban]

Way to talk in generalities Joe. Not saying there aren't a lot of fucked up things about pharma. That's why we created https://t.co/39PNLwZeYs. But to ignore that the same industry has saved who knows how many lives is bullshit and you know it.
It's also disrespectful to all the doctors, researchers and medical professionals that dedicate their lives to saving lives, like Dr Hotez and the 800k plus doctors in the country that believe vaccines save lives

You arent trying to find the ground truth on vaccines. If you were you would bring on someone who focused on debating the issue. Like @thereal_truther .

Trying to bully Dr Hotez is ridiculous. You have producers that will prepare you and you get to control the conversation.
@RobertKennedyJr also has a staff ready to prepare him, and these topics are what he talks about in every speech.

You both do this on a daily basis Dr Hotez works every day to try to find ways to help people.

Joe , you and @elonmusk's @twitter are the mainstream online media and your platforms have become everything supposedly wrong with MSM. You are driven by self interest. Just like the MSM always has been accused of.
And you both have earned that right. You busted your asses to be great at what you do and earned all you have accomplished.
But don't lie to yourselves and all of us and tell us you are different. You aren't.

[Robert Graham @robertgraham]

You can't live debate crazy, they will always win.

Live debate is just performance art. Somebody will make some new claim nobody has heard of before, and it'll be impossible to refute without having the time to go research what they just said. "Samuelsson's study from late 2021 proves you wrong". What study? I dunno, I just made it up.

The only rational debate is via the written word. One side writes something, somebody else rebuts point by point, and so on. But for the most part, podcasts are for people who can't (or don't) read, so it's not going to happen for that audience.

RFK and Rogan start with rejecting science, so there's really no way their points can be rebutted. If you only speak Japanese, you can't talk to somebody who only speaks French. This is especially a problem when the audience doesn't understand the basics of science, who'll believe that science is what RFK and Rogan claim it is.

No, no, I don't mean you should believe scientists or a consensus (they've proven untrustworthy). I mean the science itself.

In the end, the winner of the live debate isn't the one who is best at facts, but the one most willing to misrepresent facts. And that's RFK and Rogan. They will win any live debate.

Serious debate is written, live debates is for fools (Rogan's audience).